The Court of Braga and sentenced today to five years in prison, effectively a man-who for more than 20 years, took the woman to a “violence is terrible”, and even forced to have sex with a dog.
The suspect, 56-year-old was found guilty of domestic violence and rape.
It is expressly prohibited from any contact with the victim for five years, and you will have to pay 15 thousand euros to the heading of non-material damages.
In its judgment, the court states that, since the beginning of the relationship, and the life experience of husband and wife, the respondent, the consumer is in excess of the alcoholic”, was found to be a person “with a personality, a violent, aggressive, controlling, and authoritarian, on a daily basis” with the victim.
The court as a private assault with a belt, leather, hair pulling, punches to the head and the throwing of dishes, and acts, always accompanied by threats and insults.
In parallel to this, and according to the judgment, the defendant must have compelled the woman to have sex with a dog, and is found to have violated her with objects such as lamps, bulbs, seeds, and a cigarette lighter.
It all happened in the home of a couple in a Palm-tree, California.
The wife has never complained, either because they are ashamed, either, for the dependence of the economic on the defendant.
In the above, the group of judges underlines the fact that domestic violence takes on “alarming proportions in our society, in spite of the new millennium, with major advances in the technical and science are unparalleled in the other stages preceding that of our civilization.
“But in spite of this, there are a behaviour of a man who keeps you in a state that the primary focus of the development, where the violence between the men, it was the rule of the domain, and survival,” he says.
In the ruling, the group said: “the man remains, in certain cases, an inexplicable regression in terms of the affective and the emotional, exhibiting behavior that is in the distance to our most distant ancestors.”
Thus, it considers that the Criminal Law “can not tolerate this situation, and in the end, he, too, by the sanction it mildly, these actions, leaving you with the idea that they are tolerated by the society.
“Should the decisions of the courts, by the way, in such a case, do not let there be the slightest hesitation about banning such behaviour, the validity of a norm is violated, that is to say, in order that the decisions of the court, be a peacemaker and a stabilizing,” he added.
In that decision, the court took into account the fact of the deceit is intense, the unlawful high-and the fact that it’s a woman, “to be viewed by the accused as an object that is intended to satisfy only their desires, and on that subject, no longer to his own will”.
It is the longest period of time in which to practice those acts remained in place, and the “great suffering and humiliation is suffered in silence by the victim, over the course of more than 20 years.
“With its actions, the defendant caused to the worker [vítima] the pain of physical and mental stress, as well as of sorrow, anxiety, fear, and humiliation, which lasted for more than 20 years ago, and on the terms set out in respect of the facts proved, that the portrayal of violence is appalling that it has been brought to bear upon the offended party in the course of the years, where he shared his life with the defendant,” reads the ruling.
–
