[서울신문] “Exaggerated content, adaptation” Apologizes after one day of this month's girl, Chu, who was exposed.

–

▲ A photo of Chu’s graduation album and a handwritten apology released by a netizen who revealed that the abuse of this month’s girl Chu was a lie. Online community capture

–
–
Chu Hak exposer, raise apology
“It’s not very good during school days
As time passes, the memories seem to change
I didn’t get paid or agreed with the agency.”

The revealer who raised the suspicion of school violence by the group’s girl of the month, Chu (real name Kim Ji-woo), apologized after one day, saying that his claim was false. Earlier, the agency said that the suspicion of abuse against Chu was false and that it would accuse the spreader of defamation.

On the 23rd, netizen A posted a post titled “Lee Dal-so-Chu is a hak bomber” in an online community.

Mr. A said, “Everything I wrote was exaggerated,” he said. “I didn’t have a good relationship with Kim Ji-woo when I was in school, and as time went by, the memory seems to have been adapted and changed.”

“When I first wrote and felt that something was wrong, I should have written it, but I came to this point by wrong judgment. “I am really sorry for Blockberry, Lee Dalso Chu, and other members and fans,” he said.

Mr. A said he would delete all other articles related to the school bombing. “I didn’t expect things to get so big. Once again, I am sincerely sorry for Lee Dal-so Chu.”

He also posted a handwritten apology, saying that he did not receive money from the agency or agreed to an agreement.

In the handwritten apology, Mr. A said, “I was afraid to see more comments than I expected after posting. It was only then that I realized what I had done,” he wrote. “I should have revealed that my writing was false as soon as possible, but it was clearly all my fault for not doing so.”

Earlier on the 22nd, Mr. A raised the suspicion of Chu’s abuse and said, “I went back and bullied my friends. The reason was always just because I didn’t like myself.” This article spread online and controversy grew.

Management company “spreading false information, suing defamation”

In response, Blockberry Creative, the girl’s agency of the month, made an official position on the 23rd and said, “I tried my best to find out the facts of this month’s girl by getting in touch with the dissemination of the girl.” Of course, after organizing all the circumstances and situations that the agency can check, I would like to inform you that the contents related to the girl of the month are malicious and obvious false facts.”

He added, “We decided that we could no longer condone the indiscriminate dissemination of false facts about the girl of the month, and we are preparing to sue for defamation due to dissemination of false information through the Law Firm on the 24th in order to protect our artists.” .

In addition, he warned, “We will secure evidence and take strong action against related distributors, as malicious texts related to defamation spreading unfounded false facts by discussing the real names of the artists affiliated with are confirmed.”