‘○○ Pal? ‘We’ll see if there’s something’ Man in his 50s harasses feminine police officer at feast with associates | glad information

Supply time2024-06-08 06:30

1st trial, 1 yr and a pair of months in jail, courtroom custody … “Severely harassed even after being dropped at work”

(Wonju = Yonhap Information) Reporter Jaehyun Lee = A person in his 50s who violently assaulted a feminine police officer he noticed for the primary time throughout a meal celebrating the opening of a restaurant of a neighborhood acquaintance was despatched to jail and held in courtroom.

Based on the authorized neighborhood on the eighth, Chief Decide Park Hyun-jin of Prison Division 2 of the Chuncheon District Court docket sentenced Mr. A (54), who was charged with out being held on prices compelled harassment, to at least one yr and two months in jail, and arrested him.

As well as, Mr. A was ordered to take 40 hours of sexual violence therapy lessons.

Mr A was ingesting with Mr B, a police officer in his 40s, whom he first met at a meal celebrating the opening of a enterprise owned by Mr C, an acquaintance in Wonju, at 6:36pm on July 5. final yr, and once they had been alone collectively, he received up and went to Mr. B’s aspect.

Mr. A, who was launched to Mr. B by Mr. C, who was in control of the assembly on the time, stated, ‘He’s an outdated pal of my spouse (Mr. D), and as a person, he ○ A ○ pal requested Mr. B ‘The place ○’ whereas Mr C and his spouse had been away for some time It was revealed that he dedicated this crime by saying, ‘Let’s have a look at if ○ is there or not.’

Mr B, now a police officer, got here wearing his work uniform to a meal celebrating the fifth anniversary of the opening of his outdated pal Mr D’s enterprise, however turned into snug garments which Mr. C and his spouse handed, and his place had already been launched.

The indictment says that Mr B referred to as Mr C and Mr D concerning the harassment about two hours after the ingesting occasion ended, and that the pair gathered everybody on the occasion ingesting, together with Mr. A, and that they reported him. to the police.

Through the trial, Mr A stated, “I by no means stated something like that and I by no means bothered him,” and “It is very uncommon for him to proceed to sit down on the similar occasion ingesting after being assaulted after which reported the sufferer about two hours later.”

In response, the courtroom stated, “For the sufferer, the disgrace that comes from experiencing one thing sudden, the psychological burden of understanding that if that is made public, it might be identified to have members of the police drive to which the sufferer belongs. and appeal to undesirable consideration, and the congratulatory occasion might be ruined.” “It’s doable that he didn’t reply instantly resulting from varied feelings similar to laziness.”

He stated, “The defendant boldly touched the sufferer’s non-public components, which he discovered for the primary time. treating the sufferer as if she had been an harmless individual.”

Mr A appealed towards the primary trial choice.

[email protected]

Report through KakaoTalk okjebo

Unauthorized replica / redistribution, AI studying and use prohibited>
2024/06/08 06:30 Posted