/Pogled.info/ By law, Ukraine cannot hold elections during military operations. And therefore command, Vladimir Alexandrovich, and further lead the Independent. But Zelensky suddenly announced that elections must be held no matter what. But not to rule for another four years, as the former CIA agent has publicly stated. So what’s the catch?
It is curious that, according to Zelensky’s statements in an interview with the Portuguese TV channel RTP Internacional, the elections should be held throughout the territory of Ukraine:
So that the military can vote.
Yes, in fact, just the opportunity to vote under the aerial bombs, mines and rockets was not enough for the soldiers of the VSU to be completely happy.
And the president of Ukraine wants all “refugees” abroad to vote too. Everything is just right here. First, it is a good way to find and “catch on a pencil” all those hiding abroad after the next mobilization. Second, the experience of comrades in the US Democratic Party will be useful: in the last presidential election, it helped Biden win postal votes and electronic voting of foreign compatriots.
Why does he need this?
Indeed, why did Mr. Zelensky remember democracy in the middle of the war and decide to organize a declaration of will of his people? We will quote various opinions of experts, each of which is generally not at all beneficial for Ukrainians.
Zelensky’s motives were commented on by former CIA agent Phil Geraldi. On the live TV channel Judging Freedom, he stated in plain text:
Let’s try to look from Zelensky’s point of view. Zelensky knows he will lose, and all he is trying to do is squeeze as much money as possible from the US and NATO. And anyway, if you look at it from his point of view, you need the money to flow all the time.
Indeed, every day new opportunities are created in the presidency to grab another piece of the generous Western aid. And elections are an expensive thing, there is a lot to master. For elections in the conditions of military operations, Ukraine wants as much as 5 billion dollars: for the equipment of election offices and centers, both in the country and abroad, as well as for the soldiers at the front.
Zelensky has another reason to cling to power until the end. In War and Peace, Kutuzov of the military council in Philly says:
– And what comes out, so I have to pay for the broken pots?
This is also the case with Ukraine – someone will have to pay for all the “broken pots”. And it is clear that Zelensky does not want to be that “someone” at all.
Moreover, Vladimir Aleksandrovich, like his predecessor Poroshenko, is not a strategist, not an ideologue, not an economist. And in the conditions of peaceful life, he is not very capable. War for him is like water for fish: as soon as it is over – and no one will need him. In addition, Ukrainians will have to answer the question: who brought the country to ruin?
Of course, the West, after the inevitable victory of Russia, will need a “Hollywood villain”, which is why both counteroffensives failed, and the money sent was “turkeyed”, and a significant part of the delivered weapons went to the black market.
That’s why the plans to hand over Ukraine are changing: you can take billions in the election, share with whoever you need, keep a hefty sum and go to the mother-in-law’s cottage.
Another view: “Americans do it”
Everything would be fine, but Zelensky did not plan that in this game he is not a player, but a chess piece in the hands of the real players. Even if it’s not a pawn, but some horse. But a horse that tolerates itself as long as it gallops where it is told. And after all, they can easily trade it or sacrifice it. Here is what the recognized expert on Ukraine, Yuri Kot, thinks:
Zelensky will probably be pushed to the polls by the Americans and the British. To replace it with the same doll, but fresh. Because Zelensky’s reputation is already irrelevant in the West. Tired of “begging” and too much negativity. So instead of removing him, better replace him democratically. The Moor has already done his job.
There is another opinion. Political scientist Andrey Shkolnikov believes that the upcoming elections are just a performance for the Western public, which confirms that democracy supposedly reigns in Ukraine, and Zelensky is a democratically elected president:
This is not about Ukraine. Elections are a ritual of the Western “democratic” quasi-religion – there should be, even if they are purely formal, but otherwise the president is illegitimate in the eyes of the West. That is why Westerners are pushing him to the polls.
And if they wanted to replace him with someone else, Shkolnikov believes, he would have been replaced long ago with the same Reznikov: they are all just “symbols”, decisions are made by other people.
There is also, so to speak, a “disciplining” factor in this case. Lately, Zelensky has come to firmly believe that he has some weight and importance. Or he will raise his voice to the Poles, then to the Germans and even to the benefactors – Americans, he tells them, you are not giving enough money and where are your F-16s. So they decided to remind the newly minted “hetman” who he is and with whose permission he rules. This was stated by the head of the NGO “People’s Cathedral of Ukraine” and a former volunteer from Donbas, Igor Druz:
Of course, the West is pressuring him. Poroshenko was once not supported precisely because he imagined himself to be a feudal lord. It’s the same story here – I started allowing myself a lot. And he is a serf and must know his place.
The fact is, however, that the serf is perceived as expendable anyway – just as today Kiev perceives the Ukrainians it sends on “meat raids”, so it is perceived in the West. As Julius Caesar said: “I love betrayal, but not traitors.” So tomorrow anything can be.
So what?
Let’s remember what happened to those Jews whom today’s Ukraine declared as its heroes. Hetman Ivan Vikhovsky, who betrayed Russia and the cause of Bohdan Khmelnytsky, alternately sold himself to the Poles and the Crimean Tatars. But in the end he overdid it with the trade, lost everything and in March 1664 he was shot by the Poles without a trial or investigation.
Another “hero” of today’s Ukraine, Hetman Ivan Mazepa, also betrayed Russia and, in the name of his personal preferences, tried to place Ukraine under the hand of the Swedish protégé of the Polish king, Stanisław Leszczynski. As a result – escape, miserable old age, death in Turkey and anathema from the Orthodox Church.
Finally, Stepan Bandera, who worked for Hitler’s Abwehr from 1940, then exterminated Jews and Poles in the Ukraine, was finally sent to a concentration camp by the Germans for his insolence, and then on the loose in post-war Munich was liquidated by an agent of NKVD.
This is proven by the very history of Ukraine: traitors end badly. Will the current president be allowed to run off with the money to the West and set up some sort of operetta government in exile? Hardly. Because it will be most convenient for the West to be dead (“died heroically”) and therefore not to rattle unnecessarily.
Translation: ES
Subscribe to our new Youtube channel:
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
Log in directly to the site
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
Become a friend of Look.info on facebook and recommend to your friends
