Petkov and Vassilev have not talked to anyone, in their eyes this makes them heroes
“Let’s continue the change” stopped the fire in its ferocious war with the GERB in the name of the functioning of the parliament and the state not pushed into a constitutional crisis, along with the economic one? Or behind the demonstrably softened tone, Kiril Petkov and Asen Vassilev are actually playing some kind of separate game, where everyone remains an enemy. Their party was two days
took the position of an unsystematic player who aims to break with all other parts,
proclaiming their views as the only right ideology and superbly “punishing” those who do not want to recognize it.
The first such demonstration was the elevation of Nikola Minchev to the post of president, after tradition dictated that the largest parliamentary group broadcast it. And the rather arrogant explanation of Vassilev and the others in the PP – GERB problem is that they did not secure the majority to elect their person, which concerns us. There was no response to Boyko Borisov’s more than urgent invitation, who in his own style sent them the message at least 3 times that whatever configuration he presented to them, he would agree, if only to form a regular government for the tough. winter.
And if this behavior of the leaders of the “Change” was predictable, then the sectarian attitude in which they found themselves the day before yesterday towards their comrades is already causing an ever more serious loss among them.
The efforts of DB leader Hristo Ivanov to pitch politely acceptable options for all major players – from the rotation of presidents, broadcast by GERB and PP, to the selection of a unifying figure for the Speaker of Parliament – preferably Vezhdi Rashidov, who, however, they are completely ignored in order to subsequently delegate leadership to the vice presidents, and that this is the peace treaty of the 48th parliament.
Instead of at least reading it and evaluating whether to sign it, Petkov and Vasilev turned their backs on everyone and convened their own format: consultations “in front of the cameras”, as they did 10 months ago at the shopping center.
This know-how was not perceived by others, who reminded them that in plenary everything happens in front of the cameras and
there is the place where the Bulgarian parliament makes decisions
Indeed, it was extremely clear that this time no one would go to them in the “mall”, in this case the “West” hall of the National Assembly. And that they were not aiming for that at all, but only to repeat once again how Boyko Borisov, who had been specially called to arrive, was frightened by the encounter with “The Change”. Who do not want to conform neither to the opponents nor to the partners, because these same people had already managed in the legitimate format of the presidential council to agree on the path of compromise. By striking him, PP leaders have given serious grounds for suspicion that their new maxim is “The worse, the better”.
In the hall, Petkov and Vassilev welcomed the return of good tone. But with the same smile, they made it impossible to vote on what had been agreed between the remaining 6 forces in parliament: having Doyen Rashidov at the head.
Outside the cameras, the PP told the others in the clear that they would not vote for any of the GERB, the participants in the consultations said yesterday. The convocation itself, the meeting in the “Zapad” room was even just a demonstration: they knew very well that at the same time the council with the participation of the leaders of all the parliamentary groups was not yet finished.
The utter disregard for joint efforts was also expressed in the rude insult that the conversation was behind the scenes, because it took place behind closed doors.
After all, they looked for a show, PP got it: Daniel Mitov and Rumen Hristov still went up to the “Zapad” hall, before Petkov and Vassilev sat there. Therefore, the representatives of the GERB had the opportunity to announce to the media that there is clearly no interest in the “Change” event and is in isolation. The funny thing is that at that moment the two leaders of the PP crept into the room behind them, but the guests “didn’t see them”.
And it was significant that their former partners from DB and BSP also didn’t come to the meeting. They made it clear that they did not wish to be “packed” again as a triple coalition with the party that
it is emitting more and more signs of self-sufficiency
be inspired by the “status quo”, corruption and all those who do not profess his religion.
Asen and Kiril no longer speak to anyone and consider this a great act of heroism. They use DB as an intermediary. ”This was shared by a member of parliament, amazed by the behavior of Harvard students.
They wanted to flex their muscles, lifting Nikola. But at some point they realized that if he were truly elected, they would de-legitimize themselves as an angry opposition – an attitude they count on to see them get through the upcoming elections, which they are clearly eager to bring closer.
They only think in the wrong categories,
summed up the politician with extensive experience, who tried to find out what was happening in the field of the PP.
Petkov and Vassilev’s thesis that everything outside their meeting is behind the scenes angered Kornelia Ninova very much.
It was very difficult to remove the BSP from the “status quo” label. The queue to see you in the “West” room, so that there is no behind the scenes, is an indirect accusation that all of us have gathered in the most official place: the president’s office, and we are discussing something behind the scenes. in the parliament hall, said the leader from the gallery.
You may have only been here for a year, but these folks have endured the battle behind the scenes. We have not fought against the mafia and the backstage for 6 years, so that someone not only steals our program, but also steals our image. he threatened his former partners.
We become participants in the process of introducing exclusive authority, he asked his colleagues about the other groups. We not only elect Peter, Rosen, Ivan, but we pour oil on those who want to end parliamentary democracy and the party system, is Ninova’s reading of what is happening in Parliament.
It seems “like playing with fire, running around a haystack of matches and waiting to see who will light it”.
Those who want a strong hand and a presidential republic, overthrowing parliamentarism, will have a finger in their mouth, Hristo Ivanov threatened to bTV.
