Seok-Yeol Yoon image. Yonhap News
– The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office also started asking for opinions of prosecutors nationwide on the bill to completely abolish the prosecution’s right to investigate the Prosecutors’ Office, which is being promoted by the Democratic Party, and to establish a New Severe Crime Investigation Office (Investigation Office). Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol has begun the preparation process to come to the fore.
In the midst of this, former Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae, through Facebook, said, “We will hold on to it,” and launched an all-out attack aimed at Yun, and pointed out that it is “Nongae tactics to press for resignation following last December.”
Prosecutors”New Investigation Office’ and’Abolition of Prosecution’
– The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office sent an official letter to the front-line prosecutors’ office on the 25th and requested the prosecutors to gather their opinions on the three laws of the investigation office, including the bill on the establishment and operation of the Severe Crime Investigation Office, the Public Prosecutors’ Office bill, and the bill to abolish the Prosecutors’ Office Act by the 3rd of the following month. The Ministry of Justice plans to gather opinions from the front-line prosecutors’ office through the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office and submit it to the National Assembly Legislative Judicial Committee.
This is because it is a follow-up action after the Judiciary Committee originally requested inquiries on the bill initiated by Democrats Hwang Unha and Kim Yong-min along with the Ministry of Justice. Rep. Hwang’s representative initiative is to transfer the six major crimes remaining in the prosecution (corruption, economy, public officials, election, defense, and catastrophe) to the newly established investigation office. The prosecution’s intention is to completely withdraw from the investigation and keep the prosecution.
Separately, Democratic Party Rep. Kim Yong-min has initiated bills to abolish the prosecutors’ office and establish a new prosecution office at the end of last year.
–
‘Like a meeting of lawmakers in action’ led by Democrats Hwang Unha, Kim Nam-guk, Kim Yong-min, and Open Democratic Party lawmaker Choi Kang-wook, the’Law on the Establishment and Operation of the Severe Crime Investigation Office’ (Severe Crime Investigation Office) Proposed). Newsis
–
尹 After the 3rd of next month,’Investigation Office’ seems to be expressing its position
– Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol is also reviewing his position on the abolition of the prosecution’s right to investigate the passport, the establishment of the investigation office, and the promotion of the abolition of the prosecutor’s office, so it is observed that it will be after the 3rd of next month when opinions of prosecutors nationwide are gathered.
Yoon pondered with serious concern that these bills were “a problem of the entire national criminal justice system, not just at the level of the prosecution organization,” and “the investigation office could become an uncontrolled, uncontrolled central investigation department (the middle and water department).” It is said to be in progress. In addition, it is said that they are considering all countermeasures, including taking the post of prosecutor general.
In particular, Yun believes that separating the investigation and prosecution that the passport is envisioned is an impossible concept. In the case of the Gukjeong Nongdan case or the corruption case of a large corporation, which is a “significant crime,” the record is large enough to reach hundreds of thousands of pages, and the content is also professional, with the intention that if the prosecutor maintains a trial prosecution, the real truth will be eliminated.
In fact, Kim Jin-wook, the head of the High-ranking Officials Crime Investigation Office (KPA), said on the separation of the prosecution’s right of investigation and prosecution on the 25th, “There are many opinions that it is difficult to maintain the prosecution unless the investigative prosecutor enters the trial, but it is worth listening.” Separation of investigation and prosecution should be done with justifications and supplementary measures, considering that aspect.”
In his thesis’Comparative Analysis and Criticism on Separation of Investigation and Prosecution’, Shin Tae-hoon, vice president of the Changwon District Prosecutor’s Office, said, “28 of the 35 member states of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) stipulate the prosecutor’s authority to command the investigation in the constitution or law. In addition, 27 countries have prescribed the power of prosecutors to investigate,” he wrote.
秋 “Human Rights Violation and Confidence” Operation Nongae…檢 “Did you forget about the loss of Namyeong-dong Grand Office”
–
–
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae is leaving the government building after finishing the transfer of the Minister of Justice. yunhap news
– On the other hand, former Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae said that the prosecution, who has violated human rights, has entered into an unscrupulous endurance to protect the right of investigation, and is pouring an assault on the prosecution day after day. However, some observers say that the former Minister Chu is repeatedly insisting on’Suk-yeol Yoon’s resignation’ in the name of’separation of investigation and prosecution’ following’Suk-yeol Yoon’.
On the 25th, on the 25th, on Facebook, Minister Choo argued that “the essence of the investigation is human rights violations, so it is natural for prosecutors and police to disperse and check.” “The check is that the real reform is completed only when the investigation system and investigation practices are corrected”.
At the same time, he criticized Yun as if it was aimed at Yoon, saying, “It is too late for the prosecution, who has violated human rights through a planned investigation, to circumvent the investigation of living power, and to avoid the investigation and to not touch the omnipresent prosecution power.”
In response, an official at the prosecutors’ office rebutted, “Chu is trying to reverse the history by forgetting the’Namyeong-dong Grand Public Loss Room (Park Jong-cheol’s torture death case)” in the days of the all-remembered police headquarters. He also said, “Is there no way to explain the argument for dismantling the prosecution other than political revenge for the investigation of former Minister Cho Kook?”
Earlier, in an interview immediately after retirement, former Minister Choo replied, “As a minister who confirmed the considerable misconduct of President Yoon, I expected that if I first expressed my gratitude, President Yoon would also feel that degree of severity and responsibility.” There has been a time when he indicated that he intended to’Operation’.
Reporter Kim Soo-min [email protected] 
–
