Yahya Al-Sinwar: “What happens after the killing of Israel’s arch enemy?” In the Jerusalem Post

The newspaper saw that Israel was able to achieve what many thought was impossible. He dismissed those responsible for the October 7 attacks.

The Jerusalem Post said that it is now necessary to know what the next step is, especially since the war is not over yet?

The newspaper pointed out that Hamas still has military elements and missiles, and still has 101 Israeli hostages under its control.

She pointed out that the Lebanese Hezbollah group “is well armed, and still represents a threat to Israel.” ” He also pointed to the Ansar Allah Houthi group in Yemen, which also represents a “threat to Israel,” as well as the threat posed by Iran, which supports the parties that have been name

The Jerusalem Post asked about the next step, saying, “Can Israel start getting back the hostages from Gaza and is it urgent to conclude another deal to release hostages?” give on favorable terms? Then will the Israeli army direct its focus to Iran or the Houthis?”

The Israeli newspaper believed that these questions need urgent answers, saying that we will wait to see what path our friends – especially the United States – want us to take.

“But now, let us rest in the fact that the arch enemy of Israel in the past year is dead, and that some justice has been achieved for all those who lost loved ones or suffered horrors from attacks 7 October,” according to the Jerusalem Post.

Let’s turn to the Washington Post, which published an editorial entitled “How can the killing of the Hamas leader help end the war?” “

The American newspaper believed that Sinwar died as he lived: “He died a violent death.”

It seems that Sinwar died by chance, among several of his partners above ground in Gaza, and was not hiding underground and surrounded by hostages as many reports said.

The Washington Post believed that the killing of Sinwar in this surprising way makes it clear that the war situation – which was fueled by the attacks of October 7 – may not have been as the leaders of Hamas, their allies, or those who support them seen.

The American newspaper accused Al-Sanwar of having both Palestinian and Israeli blood on his hands, pointing to the hundreds of Israeli victims in the October 7 attacks on the same hand, and then the tens of thousands of Palestinian victims in the Israeli occupation that came. in response to the October 7 attacks, on the other hand.

The Washington Post believed that the killing of Sinwar, along with other Hamas leaders, achieved one of Israel’s stated goals for the Gaza war, which “could be a turning point” in that war. .

“But what is not so clear so far is whether killing Sinwar will end this conflict. “

The newspaper responded, saying: “Certainly, killing Sinwar could help if the remaining Hamas leaders accept Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s offer: surrender and hand over the 97 remaining hostages in Gaza .

“But this is highly unlikely,” said the Washington Post.

The American newspaper said, “However, Sinwar’s killing could provide an opportunity to renew negotiations regarding a cease-fire agreement​​​​​​​​and prisoner exchange,” especially since Sinwar’s instability has will be a “difficult obstacle” to reaching any agreement, according to US National Security. Councilor Jake Sullivan.

“This is an opportunity that Netanyahu must take advantage of, confront his arrogant tendencies, and not listen to the advice of far-right members of his government,” the Washington Post added.

The newspaper believed that US President Joe Biden must continue to push Israel to conclude such a deal with Hamas, as well as maintain a into a missile war with Iran.

We conclude our tour from the London-based newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat, with an article titled “What happens after the killing of Sinwar?!” By Saudi writer Mishari Al-Dhaidi.

Al-Dhaidi began by saying: “Now that the Israeli military machine has reached Yahya Al-Sinwar, the first target, since the beginning of this terrible war, in Gaza, the curtain has come down on a chapter sure from a Hamas book, no, from a Gaza book, no, from a Palestine book, no, from a book or books on War and Peace in the Wounded Middle East.”

Al-Dhaidi said: “Al-Sinwar is a real organic part of the body of Hamas, and the climate that gave birth to it. , meaning that he was a supporter of the military solution, and his relationship with the political office of Hamas, ie Khaled Meshal The rest of the “doves,” as they are called, the coordination between these people and his group, i.e. He reached the peak of his power within Hamas, or was on the way to it, after it was established, together with others, and headed the security apparatus ” Majd”, to defend Hamas and its authority.

The writer continued: “It has been said that Sinwar is the one who is ruling the negotiations about this devastating war against the people of Gaza, and even all of Palestine… And that Meshaal and the rest of his brothers want to solve political, but Sinwar rejects the excuse of both parties: Meshaal and his associates, Netanyahu, and his war group?!

Al-Dhaidi concluded by saying: “Israel can be proud today of killing its first enemy in Gaza, after a terrible harvest of casualties and destruction in Gaza.

At the end of his article, the Saudi writer asked: “How will Israel spend this military advantage in politics?! political horizon, a drain and a way out for these fumes and hot currents, or explode again, so is it time for rhetoric, rationality, and thinking about tomorrow.. .for everyone?!”