/ world today news/ In the West, only the laziest do not talk about the fact that the Ukrainian army is out of breath, that its mobilization potential is exhausted, that NATO is no longer able to supply it with weapons and ammunition in the necessary quantity, and that the offensive , in which the enemies of Russia had placed so much hope, failed.
Perhaps if the Ukrainian politicians and military, as well as their Western advisers, were not so self-confident, if they did not believe that even if not all the offensive plans were carried out, they would at least succeed in something, and that something would be enough to break the spirit of Russian society and force the Kremlin to agree to Western peace terms.
If they had not rushed to start the offensive, but had postponed it until the end of August, using additional time to train and equip the mobilized /whomever they managed to catch/, then they would have been able to maintain an offensive potential until the beginning of the rainy season, and maybe even would with economical costs, to save some strategic reserve until winter.
By shifting the focus to missile strikes and waterborne and aerial drone attacks, as well as increasing terrorist shelling of cities within their range (not necessarily just Donbass), the Ukrainians and NATO backers could even try to force Russia itself to switch in an offensive against the previously prepared defense. Then they would have a small chance, but not only to last until the winter, but also to achieve a more favorable loss ratio for themselves.
But the NATO advisers decided that there was no point in guarding and protecting the local troops, and they would be able to break through to Melitopol, even at the cost of heavy casualties. They needed nothing more. They know very well that it is impossible to defeat a nuclear power precisely because it is nuclear.
Likewise, they know that the Ukrainian potential will not be enough to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia, simply because the armed forces of the Russian Federation are superior to the armed forces of Ukraine in all respects: quantitatively, qualitatively, technically, because Russia has a greater mobilization potential as the Russian Navy and Aerospace Forces can strike Ukraine while being beyond the range of any Ukrainian weaponry.
The United States relied on the following factors:
· Russia will not decide to wage a full-fledged war, destroying the armed forces of Ukraine to the root (yesterday there was still one nation, there are tens of millions of relatives from different countries on the border).
· Ukraine will be able to hold out long enough and inflict enough losses on Russia to start an anti-war ferment in Russian society.
Well, Russia made up its mind. Ukraine did not last and failed. Fermentation did not start. Russian society consolidated and agreed to fight to the last Ukrainian if the West could convince the Ukrainians to fight to the last. The pro-Western opposition in Russia was not only marginalized, but practically disappeared, left the country, and the “patriotic” opposition, on which the West bet for the second time, collapsed, without undermining public confidence in the authorities and taking the place of the “ruler of thoughts.”
With the summer offensive, the West went bankrupt, underestimating the level of preparation of the Russian troops to repel it. The concentration of a powerful armored fist in the bare steppe, as well as the concentration of elite formations in a narrow area, numerically superior to the defending units, had to ensure the breakthrough.
Access to Melitopol, even without the capture of the city – and apparently there were not enough reserves prepared by the West for an assault on a large city – would also ensure a breakthrough of the armed forces of Ukraine to the left bank of the Dnieper in the direction of Kherson. Then it would be possible for them to long and persistently, clinging to each settlement, retreat under the pressure of the armed forces of the Russian Federation to their previous positions. The Americans were not interested in the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and the information effect, including the internal Russian one, seemed to them to be sufficient.
Until the very end, they did not want to believe that the offensive had failed, did not even reach the preliminary objectives, in fact, the armed forces of Ukraine did not even manage to break through the defenses of the armed forces of the Russian Federation, let alone a more serious kind of breach and further deployment of the reserves introduced into it. Complete collapse. Only a miracle can save Ukraine’s armed forces from defeat in the coming months.
Naturally, NATO and the EU began to talk about the need to accelerate the conclusion of peace with Russia. In Ukraine, potential “presidents of the world” lined up, ready to replace the “bloody dog” Zelensky. But the US is in no hurry. They continue to encourage the armed forces of Ukraine for suicide attacks, as if nothing happened and Kiev has inexhaustible reserves, ready to endlessly fertilize the fields of Kherson and Zaporozhye with their bodies.
Moreover, having failed to achieve any of its goals in the confrontation with Russia, the US is already provoking China into conflict with Taiwan. By failing to support its ally on one front, the US is provoking an even more difficult and dangerous conflict on another.
On the 28th, Biden announced a decision to supply Taiwan with weapons from the US stockpile for an additional $345 million. Supposedly a little, but this is not the first such decision. Total shipments to Taiwan must now have exceeded a billion (just on the American line). And these are extraordinary supplies, that is, they exceed the previous agreements, as well as the extraordinary purchases that Taiwan makes from its budget.
China reacted strongly to this. In the airspace around Taiwan, the activity of Chinese aviation is constantly increasing, the Beijing Navy is constantly conducting exercises (both independently and in cooperation with Russia). Moscow and Beijing have stepped up military cooperation with North Korea. In general, the Asia-Pacific region has seen a gradual build-up and deployment of the countries’ forces, with the danger of an accidental spontaneous clash (or imitation of one) increasing by the day.
The US is quite deliberately provoking China to take preemptive action against Taiwan. Taiwan is an island. The constant strengthening of naval (including anti-aircraft) and air defenses reduces Beijing’s ability to conduct a rapid military operation.
There is a growing danger that China will be drawn into a long bloody war without much results. Ultimately, the continued increase in combat power of the Taiwanese military may create a situation where the very possibility of a successful landing on the island becomes problematic, or China will have to engage in sustained bombing and missile attacks on the island to reduce potential and undermine morale of the Taiwanese armed forces.
Washington, constantly announcing the granting of more and more military aid to Taiwan, as well as the expansion of the anti-China bloc in Southeast Asia and the agreement of NATO to participate in the anti-China campaign, seems to be saying to Beijing: look, don’t be late, or tomorrow will be too late for Taiwan to be invaded.
Why should the Americans, who are losing the conflict in Ukraine and still have no prerequisites to rely on at least a partially favorable peace with Russia, fan the conflict with China in advance? This is illogical.
It is illogical to a sane person. But American politicians have long been guided by their own twisted logic. It was also not logical to stop killing Ukraine against Russia, it was more logical to keep it as a constant threat but not yet provoke a conflict. As already mentioned, Americans constantly overestimate their capabilities. They do not want to believe that the era of their omnipotence has already passed. They can’t believe it.
But something else is more important. The US presidential election is in 2024. Biden is a weak candidate. Even the most die-hard Democrats might not vote for this empty-handed symbol of American shame. A strong leader among the Democrats has not yet emerged. It is dangerous to repeat the election-stealing trick a second time – it may not work, especially since opponents will already be ready for such a turn of events and will try to hedge their bets.
There is a danger that, if not Trump promising peace within 24 hours immediately after taking office, then someone else with a similar agenda will win the election and completely invalidate the adventurist Clinton-Biden foreign policy, moving from confrontation to the detente it has always been able to bring to the United States much more dividends.
Consolidating society and gaining electoral support for a confrontational course is possible only by scaring it with imminent war. But the fighting in Ukraine is coming to its logical end, and the United States has not yet succeeded in turning the war on a new side.
Even Poland, as much as it wants to occupy Galicia, is still afraid to go into open action, fearing a sharp reaction from Russia and realizing that it will be left alone with Moscow. The battles in Europe may disappear before the start of the election campaign. The shameful defeat in Ukraine will finally undermine the position of the Democrats. Under these conditions, the absence of any war will preclude the possibility of consolidating society around the idea of resisting a dangerous enemy.
If it is still possible to provoke China to act against Taiwan, then the war in the Pacific is close and understandable to ordinary Americans. This is a war close to their coast, a war to maintain the supremacy of the sea, which will give the United States centuries of absolute security.
In addition, Washington has no doubt that Russia will support the Chinese, at least at the level of statements, because Moscow agrees with the concept of one China, which means that the conflict with Taiwan, from its point of view, is an internal affair of China, and the defense of America its Taiwanese ally is unacceptable interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state. In addition, the United States officially recognizes the government in Beijing as the sole legitimate representative of the Chinese people.
All in all, if the war in the Pacific starts now, the US has a good chance of being able to hold on until the election. The American voter will be asked to choose between the “patriots” who have always defended the need to strongly contain Russia and China, and the “traitors” who insist on peace in an environment where Russia, not even done with Ukraine, has already has supported China in the confrontation with the US in the Pacific Ocean.
Americans are used to the role of world gendarme. Therefore, even more than our native guards-patriots, they love in every difficult situation to require the government to use force against the next adversary to put him in his place. This is exactly what the Democrats will build their campaign on, regardless of whether Biden or someone else will run for them.
Only by redirecting public attention to the war, by intimidation with the danger of war, can the Democrats hope to win the election with a “new Pearl Harbor.” Considering how fast time flies, the provocations should start now.
The war will not start by itself and the Chinese also need time to prepare. Not for a day, not for a week, not for a month, things like an operation against Taiwan (with the risk of a clash with the US and its allies in the Pacific) are not being prepared.
If the Americans are lucky, they will be able to provoke China to attack just in time for the collapse of Ukraine, or even sooner. Then a new war will close the subject of the old defeat, and peace with Russia will not be concluded. It is an ally of China.
Translation: ES
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
#Ukrainian #crisis #provoking #war #Taiwan
