The French subsidiary of the furniture giant Ikea will appear from this Monday and a priori until April 2 before the judicial court of Versailles. She is accused, along with about fifteen individuals, of having set up a system of surveillance and espionage of its employees for years, at least between 2009 and 2012, in particular to carry out better recruitment.
Many cases of this type are brought each year before the National Commission for Informatics and Freedoms (Cnil), where in 2019 they represented a little more than 10% of complaints received. Here are a few examples.
Translators filmed 24 hours a day
In June 2019, the Cnil imposed a fine of 20,000 euros on a small Parisian translation company for an intrusive and permanent video surveillance system: the six translators were filmed “at their workstations without interruption”. The CNIL reminds that a company must clearly inform its employees when it sets up cameras and that it cannot film them continuously.
40 cameras in the back room
In February 2014, the management of a shopping center located in Saint-Médard-en-Jalles (Gironde) was put on notice by the Cnil for a “disproportionate employee video surveillance system”. During an inspection, the authority noted a total of 138 cameras on the site, 39 of which were installed in premises not accessible to the public, as well as a biometric device to control employee schedules.
–
A “Big Brother” product scanner
In December 2012, an employee of La Halle aux Chaussures received a dismissal letter for “wild breaks” detected by the scanner he carried in his hand to manage the stock in his warehouse. The management justifies this dismissal by the fact that when the device does not send a signal, it means that the employee is inactive. The industrial tribunal of Châteauroux (Indre) sanctioned the company in February 2014 for the use of this undeclared monitoring system.
–
Private detectives hired
In 2008 and 2009, two internal espionage scandals rocked the German discounter Lidl. Installing miniature cameras, hiring private detectives, collecting information on the health of employees: the group acknowledges the facts, apologizes and agrees to pay big fines in Germany. This is the case that most closely resembles that of Ikea.
A spinning mill in good standing
In 2011, Canal + was released but several ex-employees were convicted of spying a few years earlier on Bruno Gaccio, author of the satirical program Les Guignols de l’Info. The latter, who then led the internal protest against the dismissal of the boss of the channel Pierre Lescure, had been spun, filmed and the list of his calls peeled by the security service of Canal. The judges considered that despite these actions, the responsibility of the audiovisual group had not been engaged.
45 pages of personal electronic communications
It was the tenacity of a Romanian engineer, dismissed in 2007 for having used his company’s internet for personal purposes, which led ten years later to a landmark judgment of the European Court of Human Rights ( CEDH) establishing that companies could, of course, monitor their employees, but in a reasonable manner. To prove that the employee had committed a fault, his employer had presented the transcript, on 45 pages, of his personal electronic communications during one week.
–
