Why does the Lebanese judiciary consistently accept Raja Salameh’s medical excuses?

Title: Lebanese Judiciary Under Scrutiny for Consistently Accepting Medical Excuses of Governor’s Brother

Subtitle: Raja Salameh’s repeated evasions raise questions about the integrity of the Lebanese judiciary

Date: [Current Date]

By: [Author Name]

In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that Raja Salameh, brother of the Governor of the Banque du Liban, Riad Salameh, has been consistently evading his interrogation sessions by presenting various medical excuses. This has raised concerns about the integrity of the Lebanese judiciary and its willingness to accept these excuses without proper scrutiny.

Raja Salameh’s case is unique as his physical health deteriorates as soon as he is informed of the date of his interrogation session. He is then admitted to the hospital for treatment, and all diseases in his body suddenly awaken. However, once the session passes, he miraculously regains his energy, is discharged from the hospital, and continues his life normally.

This exceptional situation has led to questions about the Lebanese judiciary’s consistent acceptance of Raja Salameh’s medical excuses. It is evident that the Salameh family is adept at playing on time and the law, relying on these excuses within the Lebanese judiciary.

French Judge Aude Borosi has issued an international arrest warrant against Raja Salameh, but the Lebanese judiciary has been slow in taking action. The European judiciary, on the other hand, has insisted on extending Salameh’s visit in Beirut to hear his case, despite his repeated medical excuses.

Salameh’s evasive tactics have become more apparent in recent months. He has claimed to suffer from acute intestinal infections, severe pain requiring a “cavity” operation, and the need for open-heart surgery. Each time, he presents medical reports from different specialists to support his claims.

The head of the Cases Authority in the Ministry of Justice has rejected Salameh’s excuses and demanded a forensic doctor to examine him and verify his sudden illnesses. However, Judge Charbel Abu Samra, who is handling the case, has not appointed a doctor and instead asked for detailed reports within a short timeframe.

Despite these questionable excuses, Judge Abu Samra has approved the medical reports and set another session for July 12, where Raja Salameh, his brother, and his assistant will appear before him. However, there are concerns that Salameh’s case may suffer the same fate as the port file, which remains unresolved.

The Lebanese judiciary’s inability to pursue political cases effectively has become evident in this case. With Judge Abu Samra nearing retirement age, it is expected that the case will be transferred to another judge, further delaying any progress.

The repeated acceptance of Raja Salameh’s medical excuses raises serious doubts about the integrity and effectiveness of the Lebanese judiciary. It is crucial for the judiciary to thoroughly investigate these excuses and ensure that justice is served. Otherwise, it risks further eroding public trust in the legal system.Title: Brother of Lebanese Central Bank Governor Evades Interrogation with Mysterious Health Issues

Date: June 23, 2023

In a bizarre turn of events, Raja Salameh, the brother of the Governor of the Banque du Liban, Riad Salameh, has been consistently evading his interrogation sessions by presenting a series of mysterious health issues. Each time he is informed of the date of his session, his physical condition deteriorates, leading to hospitalization and the emergence of various ailments. However, as soon as the session passes, he miraculously recovers and resumes his normal life.

This exceptional situation has raised eyebrows and questions about the integrity of the Lebanese judiciary. It seems that Salameh’s ability to evade trial and flee from foreign justice is not a coincidence but a deliberate strategy employed by him and his family. French Judge Aude Borosi even issued an international arrest warrant against Salameh, disregarding his medical excuses. The European judiciary has also extended his visit in Beirut to hear his case, despite his continuous medical claims.

The Lebanese judiciary’s consistent acceptance of Salameh’s medical excuses raises concerns about its effectiveness and impartiality. It appears that the Salameh family has become adept at exploiting the system and using medical reports to their advantage. They have managed to provide numerous medical reports from different specialists, each time claiming a different ailment.

Salameh’s evasive tactics have not gone unnoticed. The head of the Cases Authority in the Ministry of Justice has rejected his excuses and demanded a forensic examination to verify his sudden illnesses. However, instead of appointing a doctor, Judge Charbel Abu Samra has requested detailed reports within a short timeframe. Salameh promptly provided multiple reports from a urology specialist, further complicating the situation.

What is particularly striking about Salameh’s case is the timing of his hospital stays, which always coincide with his interrogation sessions. It is concerning that he recovers within a day of the session and is discharged from the hospital. This pattern raises suspicions about the authenticity of his medical conditions and the legitimacy of his excuses.

Despite the ongoing investigations and efforts to hold Salameh accountable, there are concerns that his case may suffer the same fate as the port file, which remains unresolved. The Lebanese judiciary’s inability to pursue political cases effectively has become evident, and the impending retirement of Judge Abu Samra further complicates the situation.

It is crucial for the Cases Authority to thoroughly scrutinize Salameh’s medical reports and express an opinion on their validity. The Lebanese judiciary must demonstrate its commitment to justice and ensure that those involved in the Salameh family’s case are held accountable.

In conclusion, the evasive tactics employed by Raja Salameh and the acceptance of his medical excuses by the Lebanese judiciary raise serious questions about the integrity of the legal system. The ongoing saga highlights the need for transparency, accountability, and a fair judicial process in Lebanon.

What steps should be taken to prevent further delays and potential undermining of progress in the Salameh case, particularly with the impending retirement of Judge Abu Samra

Orts to delay and avoid facing justice. The head of the Cases Authority in the Ministry of Justice has rejected Salameh’s excuses and called for a thorough examination by a forensic doctor. However, Judge Charbel Abu Samra, who is handling the case, has not appointed a doctor and instead requested additional detailed reports.

Despite the questionable nature of Salameh’s excuses, Judge Abu Samra has approved the medical reports and scheduled another session for July 12, where Salameh and his associates will be expected to appear. However, there are concerns that this case may suffer the same fate as the unresolved port file.

The repeated acceptance of Salameh’s medical excuses not only raises doubts about the integrity of the Lebanese judiciary but also highlights its inability to effectively pursue political cases. The impending retirement of Judge Abu Samra further complicates the situation, as the case may be transferred to another judge, causing further delays and potentially undermining any progress made.

It is imperative for the Lebanese judiciary to thoroughly investigate Salameh’s medical excuses and ensure that justice is served. Failure to do so will only serve to further erode public trust in the legal system and undermine its credibility.