Home » today » Business » What reason must a bank transfer have in order not to be subjected to controls by the Revenue Agency?

What reason must a bank transfer have in order not to be subjected to controls by the Revenue Agency?

Well, with the return to all-out controls by the Revenue Agency, concerns are starting again. In fact, there are many misunderstandings that we could fall into and many possible errors. In fact, with the traceability of payments, the taxpayer has to justify anything.

Yes, because money movements can be suspected if not supported by a valid justification. Hence the need to be careful to insert a justification in payments that does not turn on the antennas of the tax authorities.

So, let’s move on to understanding which causal a transfer not to be subjected to controls by the Revenue Agency However, we must premise that the causal is nothing more than a self-declaration, therefore, in hypothesis, the taxpayer could say what he wants. This means that even if it is good to know how it is appropriate to move, we cannot avoid using consistency.

What reason must a bank transfer have in order not to be subjected to controls by the Revenue Agency?

The reason, therefore, must be non-compromising but also supported by evidence. Therefore, the reasons that we indicate in support of the money transfers must be documentable and consistent.

Furthermore, they must be demonstrable with documentation with a certain date. Such is the notarial deed or registration with the Revenue Agency and other similar ones.

This means that the causal alone is not sufficient to bring taxpayers into good standing. If, in fact, the causal “non-compromising”, “donation” or “loan” is used and this is repeated to hide undeclared income, it certainly will not work.

In fact, if the first attempt can go unnoticed, the periodicity or repetitiveness of the causal will equally put in alert the Tax. This is because any tax return will not coincide with many other data, such as standard of living, income and expenses of the business, etc. It follows that if the reason for “donation”, “gift” or “loan” is supported by other coherent documentation, this is null and void. But if this does not happen, the causal alone would not be sufficient to keep harmless from controls of the Revenue Agency.

Deepening

How to recover 20% of the holiday bonus in the tax return?

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.