What former referees said
The goal was well disallowed, Diego Costa was in an offside position and takes advantage of the position because Maurício Lemos does not have full control of the movements. According to the rule, it is considered a deviation and not a deliberate play. Nadine Bastos
Offside for gaining advantage of the position after a deviation. There is no possession of the ball by the (Atlético-MG) player to set up a ‘new moment’. Correct arbitration decision. It’s funny that no one praises it. Everyone waiting for mistakes. Guilherme Ceretta
In the first throw, the attacker in the white shirt is in an offside position, moves towards the ball, touches it, this implies his participation and characterizes the offside. The play continues with other movements until the goal is scored. Inexplicably, for me, it took a long time to mark the irregularity. I don’t know if it was the pitch’s decision or VAR’s interference, the reality that the offside at the origin is very clear to me. Emidio Marques
The goal was very well disallowed, there is a participation. We call in arbitration, he goes from the passive position to the active position. He had an active participation in the play. I would disallow the goal, yes. Alfredo Loebeling
Lots of complaints
Diego Costa stated that they “put their hand” when they disallowed his goal: “It’s very clear that it was a legal goal. I think they put their hand into the issue of interpretation. They didn’t even think about it, didn’t even look at it much. We know that for the competition to become more attractive, they have to bring Botafogo closer to their opponents. I think it’s a matter of logic, because a play like this cannot be reviewed from one moment to the next, it had to be analyzed carefully”.
2023-09-17 16:25:13
#referees #approve #disallowance #Diego #Costas #goal #Botafogo #defeat
