Habib Mahmoud
Since we passed the 21st of Jumada al-Awwal 1446; Before closing the expropriation file of properties that are within the scope of the Qatif Oil Field Development Project; This calls for saying, “What do we think of you, Aramco? “…!
We were built on what the name “Aramco” means: reliability, high performance, and absolute certainty in time. One of the things that this major national company is proud of is: It accomplishes what is needed before the “dead line,” and it does not joke with an officer there or with a contractor with him about the value of time. Whoever examines any of the company’s contracts; He is amazed by the professionalism of the information, the professionalism of the investigation, and the fair control of rights.
So why is it embarrassing to move beyond the issue of expulsion for two whole years?
simply; Because this opens a complex door for the company and puts pressure on itArticle 18 of the Law on Expropriation for Public Benefit. This article states: “Compensation must be paid for the property expropriated for public benefit within two years from the date of the decision allows the initiation of expulsion procedures to request a reassessment, if the delay in paying the compensation is not due to its own cause.”
The decision issued by His Majesty the Minister of Energy No. 1687/440201 dated 5/21/1444; He was aware of the details of the expulsion system, particularly Article 18, and His Majesty’s decision stated the following:
Fourth: Saudi Aramco pays compensation to rights holders according to the decision of the Real Estate Compensation Evaluation Committee, and payment procedures are completed before the date specified to leave the property, while s that the compensation amount will not be delivered to its owner until after the property has been delivered and registered by a notary or court, and compensation will be paid within two year from the date of Issuance of the authorization decision to initiate disinfection procedures according to the provisions of Article (Eighteen) of the system.
Between the date 5/21/144 and the date 5/20/1446 there were two full years. Today there are 5 more days. Compensation was paid only to a proportion of property owners, who are owners of residential properties with free deeds. In the case of agricultural property owners; The issue is still between take and take.
Not to mention; Property owners are mortgaged (non-exempt). They have a problem with the nature of the procedure that requires debt certificates from current parties. The purpose of Aramco’s request for the certificate is to guarantee the rights of the owner and mortgagee, and this is indeed a very respectable reasoning. Based on each certificate, Aramco issues two checks: the first to the property owner, and the second to the mortgage holder, each providing the amount due.
However, there is a problem related to the difference in the date of the debt certificate and the date the two audits were issued. of the mortgage on the day the certificate was issued and the date of issuance of the check, especially if the issuance of the check was canceled ..!
The solution to this problem is easy, and can be addressed with a well-known procedure in security systems. The solution is to issue checks in the names of the property owners and “treat” the parties to whom the properties were mortgaged. Regardless of the date and value of the cheque; The entity takes his right to the mortgage, and gives the rest of the amount to the owner of the property, since the property is “handled” for him, and the owner cannot spend it alone.
Aramco is too professional to tell anyone what to do, not me or anyone else. But it is a proposal that I submitted after citizens contacted me and asked me to express their voice to the company. I hope that the proposal will find someone who will listen to it and working on its development to reduce the burden on the people.
God is the Giver of success.
2024-11-25 08:13:00
#Aramco
**Considering the proposed solution of issuing compensation checks directly to property owners while officially recognizing mortgage holders’ interests, what potential legal and practical challenges might arise in its implementation?**
## Interview: Aramco’s Expropriation Process – A Critical Discussion
**Introduction:**
Welcome to World Today News! Today we’re diving deep into the complexities surrounding the Qatif Oil Field Development Project and the accompanying expropriation process. Joining us are two esteemed guests: Mr. **[Guest 1 Name and Credentials]**, a Legal expert specializing in land acquisition and property rights, and **[Guest 2 Name and Credentials]**, a community representative advocating for impacted property owners in Qatif.
**Section 1: Understanding the Context**
* **Host:** Mr. Mahmoud, your article has sparked a lot of debate regarding the pace and procedures of the project’s expropriation phase. Could you elaborate on the concerns raised by citizens and their expectations based on Aramco’s reputation for efficiency and timely execution?
* **Guest 1 (Mahmoud):** I’ve mentioned in the article how Aramco, historically, is admired for its professionalism and adherence to deadlines. We see this reflected in their contracts and their overall operational approach. This makes the delay in completing the compensation process particularly perplexing for the affected citizens. My article aims to shed light on this discrepancy and encourage a dialogue that leads to a fair and timely resolution.
* **Host:** Mr. [Guest 2 Name], you represent the voices of those directly affected by this project. What are the primary challenges facing property owners in Qatif, particularly those with mortgaged properties?
**Section 2: Navigating the Legal Landscape**
* **Host:** Mr. [Guest 1 Name], the article highlights Article 18 of the Expropriation Law and the stipulated two-year deadline for compensation. What legal implications arise when this timeframe is not met?
* **Guest 1:** Article 18 is crucial, as it provides a legal framework to protect property owners’ rights. The two-year window ensures timely compensation and safeguards against undue hardship. When delays occur, the article empowers affected individuals to request reassessment, which is precisely what many in Qatif feel compelled to pursue.
* **Host:** How have these legal provisions been applied in practice with regards this particular project?
**Section 3: Exploring Solutions**
* **Host:** Mr. Mahmoud, you proposed a solution involving issuing checks in property owners’ names and officially recognizing mortgage holders’ interests. Would you elaborate on the feasibility and potential benefits of this approach?
* **Guest 1:**
My suggestion was born out of a desire to simplify the process and mitigate complications arising from the timing variance between issuance of debt certificates and issued checks. This approach would streamline the process without compromising the rights of either the borrower or the lender.
* Host:
Mr. [Guest 2 Name], what is your assessment of this proposed solution? Would it address the key concerns raised by the community?
* **Guest 2:**
**
**Section 4: Looking Ahead**
* **Host:** What are your hopes for the future of this project and its impact on the Qatif community?
* **Guest 1:** I truly believe in Aramco’s commitment to responsible development and its dedication to community well-being. I’m hopeful that our discussion today will contribute to a swift and just resolution for all stakeholders involved.
* **Guest 2:** The Qatif community has always been resilient and adaptive. We seek constructive collaboration with Aramco to ensure that this project benefits both the company and the people it impacts.
**
**Conclusion:**
Thank you to both our guests for their valuable insights and perspectives. We hope this discussion fosters greater understanding and encourages a productive dialogue between Aramco and the Qatif community. We believe that open communication and a commitment to fairness are crucial for navigating complex situations like this, ultimately leading to a positive outcome for all.