The Israeli newspaper “Maariv” published a new report in which it said “Israel must end the Lebanon war as soon as possible,” noting that “every day passes, Hezbollah succeeds in renewing its formations and forces while also focusing on leadership.”
He referred to the report he had translated “Lebanon 24” In the past few hours, Hezbollah launched its missiles and drones towards many areas of Israel, including places in the center of the country, explaining that the party’s attacks were intense
The newspaper explained that many Israeli settlers asked about the response that Israel must implement against these attacks, and they said, according to what was said in it: the answer to that is simple, that Israel does not have to answer, but instead. he must continue to fight and continue to attack Hezbollah in southern Lebanon and in other cities such as Tyre, Sidon, Nabatieh, and of course Beirut.”
The report indicated that “Hezbollah headquarters and warehouses in the Bekaa – eastern Lebanon, as well as in Syria, and if necessary, in Iraq as well,” and continued: ” Hezbollah understands that we are approaching the end of the battle, and what is happening now is that the party and Iran are now building and preparing for the next day of the war. war However, there is a series of issues fundamental to the party: how to maintain its position in Lebanon on the political level, as well as the way in which it preserves military strength within the country.
The report opined that “Hezbollah tried to drag Israel into an old-new equation, according to which an attack on Beirut is equal to an attack on Tel Aviv,” and added: “It should not Israel must be drawn into this equation, because it must. Continue to work to beat Hezbollah everywhere.” Despite launching rockets into Israel.”
For his part, Israeli analyst Amitsia Baram says, “The conflict against Hezbollah puts Israel in front of a complex strategic dilemma that combines ground and air combat and decisions to regarding the future of the villages of southern Lebanon,” and he added: “While Israel is working to increase. military pressure with the aim of weakening the group and ceasing fire.
He believed that “the fight against Hezbollah requires Israel to move in two main ways – land and air – and each of them has its advantages and disadvantages,” and he continued: “The ground effort is the most difficult part, because it requires a high price in the form of choice among young soldiers, this is an opportunity that may come true.”
Baram explains the possibility of advancing even beyond the Litani in southern Lebanon, saying: “30 km from the border is the Litani River, and behind it, at a distance of another 25 km, is the Awali River, at is a topographical advantage and However, a step forward could cost us a big loss, so in my opinion, it is better to be content with capturing the mountains up to 10 kilometers from border, using air power on a large scale.”
Referring to air operations, Baram says “it can achieve important results while reducing losses. The air force is able to reach every corner of Lebanon, and this is our main advantage we need to increase air strikes on Hezbollah military targets and warn citizens of the need to evacuate.” “This is a step that would increase the number of refugees and create internal pressures in Lebanon.”
According to Baram, “expanding the targets of the air strike will put effective pressure on Hezbollah and damage the morale of the latter,” and he added: “In my opinion, this is the path that will gain the advantage most in the current fight and will help to achieve important achievements in the short term.”
Source: Translation of “Lebanon 24”
2024-11-25 19:54:00
#Hezbollah #members #day #Israeli #newspaper #publishing
What are the specific steps the international community can take to address the root causes of the conflict, as outlined by Dr. Cohen, and encourage a long-term, sustainable peace between Israel and Hezbollah?
## World Today News – Interview: The Future of the Israel-Hezbollah Conflict
**Welcome to World Today News, where we delve into the most pressing global issues. Today’s topic: the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, and the recent analysis offered by Maariv newspaper. Joining us are two esteemed guests:**
**Dr. Sarah Cohen**, a political science professor specializing in Middle Eastern politics and conflict resolution, and **Mr. David Levy**, a retired IDF Brigadier General with extensive experience in counter-terrorism operations.
**[Pancake Intro Music]**
**Host:** Thank you both for joining us. Dr. Cohen, the Maariv article cites Hezbollah’s growing strength and suggests Israel should focus on aggressive action against Hezbollah strongholds in Lebanon, specifically overlooking the potential humanitarian impact. Do you agree with this approach, and how do you see the international community responding to such a strategy?
**Dr. Cohen:** Thank you for inviting me. The article raises crucial questions about the complex dynamics of this conflict. While Hezbollah’s military buildup is a legitimate concern for Israel,
a purely military solution risks exacerbating the already volatile situation. Targeting civilian infrastructure and potentially increasing the refugee crisis would likely draw international condemnation and further destabilize the region.
**Host:** Mr. Levy, Maariv also suggests that threats to Tel Aviv should not deter Israel from retaliations against Hezbollah bases in Beirut. With your military background, what are the tactical and ethical considerations of
targeting a heavily populated city like Beirut?
**Mr. Levy:** The Maariv article echoes a long-standing military doctrine: to strike at the heart of one’s enemy. But the reality of urban warfare is far more complex. Civilians inevitably bear the brunt of any conflict in densely populated areas, and the moral and strategic implications of such an action must be carefully weighed.
**Host: Israel and Hezbollah Combat Strategies**
**Host:** Dr. Cohen, the article highlights the dilemma Israel faces: balancing ground and air offensives against Hezbollah. What are the inherent advantages and disadvantages of each approach?
**Dr. Cohen:** Ground offensives offer a direct and potentially decisive blow against Hezbollah’s strongholds but come at a high cost in terms of human casualties and international scrutiny.
Air strikes can minimize Israeli casualties, but they risk alienating Lebanese civilians and lacking the precision needed to truly dismantle Hezbollah’s infrastructure. A strategic approach likely involves a careful balance of both.
**Host:** Mr. Levy, you have experience leading counter-terrorism operations. What are your thoughts on striking Hezbollah targets deep within Lebanon, potentially beyond the areas Israel continues to use
as buffer zones?
**Mr. Levy:** Any cross-border operation carries significant risks, both militarily and politically. Expanding the conflict geographically could provoke a broader regional response and destabilize an already fragile country. It’s imperative to consider the long-term consequences and potential for unintended escalation.
**Host: The Long-Term Impact of The Conflict**
**Host: Dr. Cohen, the Maariv article asserts that Hezbollah is preparing for a “next day” in the conflict. How can the international community effectively work to prevent further escalation and promote long-term stability in the region?
**Dr. Cohen:** A lasting solution requires addressing the root causes of the conflict: political disenfranchisement, economic inequality, and the presence of foreign militias in Lebanon. The international community
can play a critical role by supporting regional dialog, promoting good governance in Lebanon, and advocating for the withdrawal of foreign forces.
**Host:** Mr. Levy, in your experience, what are the critical factors that will determine the outcome of this conflict?
**Mr. Levy:** The outcome will ultimately depend on the resolve of both sides, the effectiveness of international mediation, and the willingness of regional powers to support a peaceful resolution.
It is a complex conflict with no easy solutions, but a commitment to peace, diplomacy, and a focus on the long-term wellbeing of all parties involved are essential for a sustainable outcome.
**Host:** Thank you both for your insightful perspectives. This is a complex and evolving situation with enormous consequences for the region and the world. We encourage our viewers to continue engaging in informed dialog and seeking solutions that prioritize peace and stability.
**[Piano outro music]**
