Who and why rushed to cover up the evidence that would provide answers to what caused the deadly explosion after the collision of the two trains.
The completion of one year since the tragic accident in Tempe that led to the death of 57 people and haunted dozens more who were still on the road to death did not lead society to oblivion. Over 1,250,000 citizens sign a text demanding the punishment of political figures who are covered behind immunity. At the same time, a series of methods is revealed, which constitute an attempt to disorient and obstruct the research. It seems that at the time when the society was stunned and shocked watching the recovery of the dismembered children, our children, from the molten masses of metals, an unimaginable operation to cover up what has happened was also taking place. This operation does not concern the responsibilities for the failure of the remote control station of the trains, but the incident itself.
Cameras recorded the collision and the footage was analyzed. During the collision, it appears that a first explosion is created due to the destruction of the electrical conduits. The particular electrical explosion is a very large spark or set of sparks, which has the appearance of lightning, just as manifested in the collision of the trains. After six seconds, a second explosion occurs, a mechanical explosion, originating, as it is estimated, from the ignition of flammable materials and the release of gases.
Was the commercial train carrying explosives or flammable materials? If so, why doesn’t it show up on the bills of lading? Benzene, toluene and other chemicals that may have caused the explosion were indeed detected in the area around the crash site. However, the official investigation gave no basis for these findings.
Read more – Mitsotakis for Tempi: Vague promises for “punishment of guilty parties” but “extreme” allegations of racketeering
Read more – Struggle for Tempi: They run with photos of the victims and demand justice
Cranes and graders
But was there really an investigation? On the very first day after the accident, while the whole of Greece is watching with bated breath and wet eyes what has happened, next to the cranes that are trying to free bodies or maybe even survivors, excavators and bulldozers are destroying evidence. They do not mortar the area as originally estimated, but systematically remove soil, debris, even human limbs, to then pour mortar and cement.
Just one week later, the then Deputy Minister to the Prime Minister Christos Triandopoulos, as the head of the government echelon, announces on the channels that the government has a significant success: it has quickly restored the area with excavations and excavations. In other words, he confesses at an unsuspecting time that he knows and even brags about the destruction of evidence while the investigation is ongoing.
Who gave this order? Although Triandopoulos denies being the one who ordered the destruction of evidence, everyone points to him. His fellow ministers themselves admit to Documento that he was given reports on every development. The government continues to make blanket references to the Justice Department finding out what happened and spout platitudes about its willingness to find the truth. The truth, however, seems to coincide with the conclusion that the merchant train was carrying materials that were not investigated, but instead were carefully buried.
The revelation that Documento makes is even more supportive of the conclusion. Ten medical examiners were present at the scene of the collision. According to international protocols for dealing with mass disasters, toxicological, histological and other specialized tests had to be carried out during the forensic investigation. This is because the autopsy in such cases does not require the cause of death and the identification of the bodies, but the collection of evidence from the bodies that will guide the investigation. In this particular case, for example, if there were traces of explosives or chemical substances. In such a detection, the conclusion is drawn that there were illegal and dangerous substances on the train and of course that the dead were more than would have been in another collision.
Reports – carbon
In the autopsies, the required examinations were not carried out, with the exception of the driver. The reports appear to be carbon copies of each other as they only state the cause of death, while most are signed by experienced coroners. In fact, at least 30 of the 56 autopsies have been performed from a single test.
When the coincidences are many, they cease to be coincidences and become a pattern and a rule of operation. This pattern resembles a pattern of systematic and deliberate cover-up related to the cause of the second major train explosion.
Were some people fooling around while their colleagues searched the wreckage for clues? Were the coroners unaware that in addition to the cause of death they must look for evidence of what happened on the train by examining the bodies of the victims? The interrogation must answer. And of course the government. Who gave orders? What was the train carrying?
#hide #rubble #Tempe
