What did Israel achieve from the massacre of Haniyeh and Shukr?

It cannot be denied that the assassination of the head of the political bureau of Hamas, Ismail Haniyeh, in the Iranian capital, Tehran, and the military chief of Hezbollah, Fouad Shukr, in the southern suburbs of Beirut, represent a success for Tel Aviv, especially at the level of intelligence, despite question marks about doing so without the support and involvement of other powers, especially the United States of America, but the course of subsequent events must examine the results he achieved in practical terms, in as a result of the confirmations that he will be on a date with a joint response or individual responses from the other axis.

Research on this matter, according to informed sources of “Al-Nashra,” must deal with a group of subjects, which begins with the haste of the disturbing forces, that is, “Hezbollah” and the “Hamas” movement, until the gap to fill left by the two murders, in a way that proves that they are not in a position There is the possibility of a decline, which was expected based on their historical experiences, as a sign that it continues continued the work he started on the eighth of October last year, while “Hamas” went on to elect its president in Gaza, Yahya Al-Sinwar is Haniyeh’s successor, in message declaring that the murder. from the head of her political bureau on her to stick more to the conflict option.

According to these sources, the above means that both sides decided to empty the escalation measures initiated by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, after his return from the United States, of their content, which mainly includes a restraining message for them, while he was thinking. that he could provide He has the image of full influence that he wanted, and it helps him to restore the deterrent power of Tel Aviv, which was broken after the “Al-Aqsa Flood” operation on the seventh day of October last year.

Beyond that, the same sources indicate that, from a military point of view, there is a set of points, which require further research later, starting with the equation of Israel’s need for protection from the his various friends with increasing threats, after the alliance with him was given. a way to persuade some countries in the region to go to war To normalize relations with it, while the high level of risks it is exposed to cannot be ignored, as it is today the position of waiting for answers, away from the statement that Netanyahu wants to drag the region into a full-scale war, on the basis that if he had been able to do so, he would not have hesitated.

On a related level, follow-up sources indicate, through Al-Nashra, that there are other factors that are not as important, including, for example, the economic effects, since the number of losses ‘ increase as a result of these security measures. Tel Aviv had to take, which will have other consequences At the level of foreign investments in the next stage, without ignoring the basic feature related to the settlers’ vision of the future, as the theory to Israel is a safe place for them. fell, which was confirmed by the increase in immigration levels over the months of the war.

In addition to the above, the same sources see the need to compare the current reality with the war objectives that the Israeli leadership had set, especially regarding the recovery of prisoners and the elimination of “Hamas,” because they believe that the new facts have undermined the truth. able to reach an agreement that leads to recovery, while he has failed. way more.

In conclusion, these sources indicate that the only goal, apart from a corporate meltdown, that Netanyahu could have achieved is to increase the pace of growth in the region, which could be showing his desire to drag him into an all-out war to serve him. personal interests, but what is certain is that making that decision is not in his hands alone In fact, there are not even signs for it, but if it happens, it will most likely only make him sink no longer.