<div id="firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type="article" data-bind-html-compile="article.body" data-first-article-body="
And she was Federal Supreme Court in Iraq (The highest judicial authority) announced Wednesday that it has no constitutional authority to dissolve parliament.
He said it on the Iraqi parliament He dissolved in case of non-fulfillment of his constitutional duties, considering this “The stability of the political process requires that all respect the provisions of the Constitution and not exceed them, and no authority can continue to go beyond constitutional periods indefinitely.”.
The dissolution of parliament is a fundamental request of the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, who has threatened further progress, but his opponents in the framework of coordination see the formation of a government as a priority.
The Iraqi constitution clarifies the mechanism for the dissolution of the parliament: that the parliament be dissolved by an absolute majority of its members with two options The first is at the request of a third of its members, and the other is at the request of the Prime Minister and with the approval of the President of the Republic.
The roots of the crisis
• The crisis began when Al-Sadr wanted to form a political majority government with the participation of the Alliance of Sovereignty led by Al-Halbousi and the Democratic Party of Kurdistan, led by Massoud Barzani, but the coordination framework supported by Iran rejected him.
• After al-Sadr was unable to form that government, he announced the resignation of his deputies from Parliament and called for the formation of a non-consensual government that would have been acceptable.
• But the appointment of former Dawa Party leader Muhammad Shiaa Al-Sudani as prime minister angered Al-Sadr, who ordered his followers to take to the streets and storm Parliament.
• Sit-ins in front of Parliament developed, leading to the outbreak of armed clashes between Al-Sadr’s Al-Salam Brigades and Popular Mobilization, which constituted a milestone in the political crisis.
• After that, Al-Sadr wanted to return to the House of Representatives, repeating the elections, so the current appealed against the House of Representatives, claiming that it had not fulfilled its constitutional duties.
Commentators and members of the coordination framework expressed their satisfaction with the Federal Court’s decision not to dissolve the House of Representatives, which gives a political character to the legal decision, while the leaders of the Sadrist movement saw that the decision condemned “third block”This is the path of the coordinating framework forces that prevented al-Sadr from forming the government.
Escalation phase
This was stated by the political expert, Ali Al-Baydar “It concerns the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr. If we decide to proceed with the path of escalation, we will find ourselves faced with new clashes and a series of violence, which may not end, which will aggravate the political conflict, and make the way the field and the faisal in that intractable crisis for several months.”.
Al-Baydar added in a statement to the site “Sky News Arabia” That “The coordination framework seems to be on the way to forming a government, without looking at al-Sadr’s position or seeking his approval, which is a growing step that could trigger a new crisis in the country.”.
He pointed this out”The sure way is for parliament to dissolve, which is an option that will be a win-win situation, even for parties that think they might lose in early parliamentary elections.”.
Attracted “The need for some political parties not to invest in the recent court decision, and to put it in the legal position, to avoid paths that could create a new conflict, which may not be contained.”.
The coordination framework and the forces allied to it presuppose the resumption of parliamentary sessions after the fortieth visit to start consultations to form the new government.
“>
And she was Federal Supreme Court in Iraq (The maximum judicial authority) announced Wednesday that it has no constitutional authority to dissolve parliament.
He explained it on the Iraqi parliament He disbanded in scenario he unsuccessful to satisfy his constitutional responsibilities, stating that “the stability of the political process calls for that all abide by the provisions of the constitution and not surpass it, and no authority can carry on to surpass constitutional conditions indefinitely.”
The dissolution of parliament is a basic ask for of the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, who has threatened further progress, but his opponents in the framework of coordination see the development of a govt as a precedence.
The Iraqi constitution clarifies the mechanism for the dissolution of the parliament: that the parliament be dissolved by an absolute vast majority of its customers with two alternatives The to start with is at the request of a 3rd of its users, and the other is at the ask for of the Primary Minister and with the approval of the President of the Republic.
The roots of the crisis
• The disaster started when Al-Sadr preferred to form a political vast majority govt with the participation of the Alliance of Sovereignty led by Al-Halbousi and the Democratic Get together of Kurdistan, led by Massoud Barzani, but the coordination framework supported by Iran rejected him.
• Soon after al-Sadr was not able to form that authorities, he announced the resignation of his deputies from Parliament and identified as for the formation of a non-consensual authorities that would have been appropriate.
• But the appointment of former Dawa Get together chief Muhammad Shiaa Al-Sudani as prime minister angered Al-Sadr, who purchased his followers to get to the streets and storm Parliament.
• Sit-ins in front of Parliament made, top to the outbreak of armed clashes between Al-Sadr’s Al-Salam Brigades and Common Mobilization, which constituted a milestone in the political disaster.
• After that, Al-Sadr preferred to return to the Residence of Reps, repeating the elections, so the existing appealed towards the Residence of Reps, claiming that it had not fulfilled its constitutional duties.
Commentators and users of the Coordinating Framework Forces expressed their pleasure with the Federal Court’s determination not to dissolve the Residence of Associates, which gives a political character to the lawful conclusion, though the leaders of the Sadrist movement saw that the conclusion condemned the ” third block “, which is the path of the forces of the coordination framework that prevented Sadr from forming the govt.
Escalation stage
Political affairs pro Ali al-Baydar reported that “the entire situation is linked to the chief of the Sadrist motion, Muqtada al-Sadr. In that intractable crisis several months in the past.
Al-Baydar extra, in a assertion to “Sky Information Arabia”, that “the coordination framework seems to be proceeding on the path of government formation, devoid of looking at al-Sadr’s posture or searching for his approval, which is a stage ahead. increasing that could set off a new crisis in the place “.
He pressured that “the certain way is for the Household of Associates to dissolve, which is an choice that will be a win-get problem for anyone, even for functions that assume they can shed in early parliamentary elections”.
He stressed: “The have to have for some political functions not to commit in the modern court decision, and to place it in a legal position, to steer clear of any route that could make a new conflict that may not be contained.”
The coordination framework and the forces allied to it presuppose the resumption of parliamentary classes soon after the fortieth pay a visit to to start off consultations to variety the new governing administration.
–
