Table of Contents
- 1 The policy of the US Department of Justice
- 2 The attempt to overturn the 2020 election result
- 3 The Stormy Daniels case
- 4 The case of election fraud in Georgia
- 5 Trump in the White House and not in prison
- 6 **Past:** How has the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity impacted past attempts to hold presidents accountable for their actions? **Action:** Will this precedent be used by either side in Trump’s legal cases? **Audience:** What implications does this have for future presidents and the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches?
When, on November 5, Donald Trump defeated Kamala Harris in the US presidential election, completing a historic (for many, nightmarish) comeback to the White House, four years after his defeat by Joe Biden, one of the questions immediately raised is what will happen with the criminal charges he faces.
It is recalled that the US president-elect is facing prosecution related to four cases, two of which relate to his attempt to overturn the 2020 election result, one to the “grab” of sensitive government files after he left the White House in January 2021 and one for trying to buy off porn star Stormy Daniels’ silence about their relationship, before the 2016 elections.
The policy of the US Department of Justice
As early as the day after the election, most analysts argued that the US Justice Department, true to its policy since 1973, would suspend prosecutions, as sitting presidents enjoy immunity. However, each case is different, so it would be useful to see what applies separately to each of them.
Mishandling classified documents
The specific case concerns Trump’s action in moving classified documents from the White House to his home in Mar-a-Lago, Florida, and obstructing the Justice Department’s efforts to recover the records.
This case should be considered “finished” as already last July, Judge Elaine Cannon – appointed by Trump – dismissed the accusations, citing as the basis of her reasoning that the special counsel of the Ministry of Justice, Jack Smith, did not he should have taken up this particular case.
Even if this were not the case, however, it is unlikely that the US judicial system would decide to waive the immunity of a sitting president for mishandling classified documents.
The attempt to overturn the 2020 election result
Donald Trump has also been charged with trying to sway the 2020 election.
Then, as the outgoing president, Trump publicly supported allegations of voter fraud against him that he knew were untrue, pressured state and federal officials — including Vice President Mike Pence — to change the results, and ultimately instigated the violent attack on Capitol Hill. of the US in a desperate attempt to undermine American democracy and cling to power, according to the indictment.
The case stalled as Trump appealed his claim of presidential immunity to the US Supreme Court, which ruled in July that former presidents are immune from prosecution for official acts they did while in the White House.
The Stormy Daniels case
Last May, a jury in New York state unanimously found Trump guilty of 34 felony counts related to his attempt to buy Stormy Daniels’ silence for $130,000 before the 2016 U.S. election about their sexual relationship years ago. .
The case was linked to a wider conspiracy to defraud the US electorate before the 2016 election and withhold from American voters information that could influence their judgment.
Donald Trump’s sentencing announcement – originally scheduled for July 11 and then postponed again in September – has been set for November 26. It is up to Judge Juan Mersan on whether the former president’s punishment will include jail time.
However, if Trump is sentenced to prison it could be years before he is incarcerated due to an expected appeal and he most likely will not serve his sentence until the end of his term in 2028.
The case of election fraud in Georgia
The voter fraud case in Fulton County, Georgia, which has been stalled since June when the state appeals court halted pretrial proceedings, is expected to follow the same fate of dismissal.
The case is also blocked in a pink scandal, as there is an attempt to depose the state prosecutor, because she had a relationship with the special counsel. Although the judge ruled that she can remain in office, Trump and his co-defendants have appealed.
Legal experts believe that Trump may go a step further and take action against the prosecutor, given his obsession with his political opponents.
Trump in the White House and not in prison
So we see that it is very difficult for Donald Trump to leave the White House to go through the prison gate. After all, even if the justices were to make such a decision, Trump, as the sitting president, has the power to grant suspensions and pardons, according to the Constitution.
So far, there is no precedent preventing the president from pardoning himself, so in theory there is no obstacle, but on the other hand this is something that has never happened before.
#accusations #Trump #won #election
**Past:** How has the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity impacted past attempts to hold presidents accountable for their actions? **Action:** Will this precedent be used by either side in Trump’s legal cases? **Audience:** What implications does this have for future presidents and the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches?
## World Today News Presents: Can Justice Prevail in the Age of Trump’s Return?
**Host:** Welcome to World Today News. Today, we delve into the complex legal landscape surrounding Donald Trump’s unexpected return to the White House. Joining us are two esteemed legal experts to analyze the potential implications of his presidency on the ongoing criminal charges he faces. We have Professor Emily Carter, a constitutional law scholar, and Attorney Michael Jones, specializing in criminal justice and presidential immunity. Welcome both!
**Professor Carter, let’s begin with the big question: can Trump face prosecution now that he’s president again?**
**Professor Carter:** Well, the question isn’t as straightforward as it seems. While the Justice Department traditionally suspends prosecutions against sitting presidents, this situation is unprecedented. Trump faces multiple, serious charges, stemming from both his actions as a private citizen and as a former president.
**Attorney Jones, considering the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on presidential immunity for official acts, how might that impact the attempts to overturn the 2020 election case?**
**Attorney Jones:** The Supreme Court’s ruling creates a fascinating legal hurdle. The line between “official acts” and exceeding presidential authority is blurry. The prosecution will have to navigate this carefully, demonstrating that Trump’s actions went beyond the scope of his office and constituted criminal intent.
**Professor Carter, Trump’s conviction in the Stormy Daniels case stands out. What are the implications for his presidency, especially with his sentencing looming?**
**Professor Carter:** This conviction presents a unique scenario. It demonstrates that Trump can be held accountable under the law, even as President. However, the potential for appeal and the possibility of a future pardon while in office further complicate matters.
**Attorney Jones, the Georgia election fraud case is also in limbo. How might the ongoing legal battles surrounding the prosecutor impact its trajectory?**
**Attorney Jones:** This case is incredibly complex. The attempts to remove the prosecutor raise serious ethical concerns and highlight the politicization of the justice system. It remains to be seen how this drama will play out, but it adds another layer of uncertainty to Trump’s legal situation.
**Professor Carter, what are the broader implications of a President facing serious legal charges? How does this impact public trust in the justice system and the presidency itself?**
**Professor Carter:** This situation is deeply troubling. It undermines faith in the rule of law and erodes the principle of equality before the law. It also raises serious questions about the willingness to hold those in power accountable for their actions.
**Attorney Jones, looking forward, what are your predictions for how these cases might unfold during Trump’s presidency?**
**Attorney Jones:** Predicting the outcomes is near impossible. This situation is unprecedented, and much will depend on the judiciary’s stance on presidential power and the willingness to pursue justice regardless of political position.
**Host:** This certainly is a complex and evolving story. Thank you both for sharing your insights on this crucial issue. Our viewers can stay tuned to World Today News for further updates on these developments.
