The Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources (Semarnat), Alicia Bárcena, clarified this Thursday night that there will be dialogue with the communities affected by the contamination of the Sonora River to address the damage caused ten years ago by the company Grupo Mexico with the discharge of waters with heavy metals.
“I want to be clear: we will dialogue with the communities affected by the Sonora River due to the great environmental disaster of mining in Mexico,” Bárcena said from her X account.
He highlighted that “your voice and participation is essential for us to act together in a remediation program. Nothing about you without you! Sonora River Basin Committees.
On the same social network, the committees asked him “when will this dialogue be?”, because they have already requested a meeting with Semarnat, through Marina Robles, undersecretary of Environmental Policy and Natural Resources, “and we have not received a response.”
“We remain attentive to the date proposal, ideally in the territories affected by the spill,” they noted in their message.
Hours before, the committees accused Semarnat in a statement of having reached an agreement with Grupo México without taking into account the victims to address the sanitation and restoration of contaminated water bodies in the state.
This statement was made after the secretary declared in the Mañanera de Pueblo this Thursday, during the presentation of the National Water Plan, “we already met with the businessmen and agreed to make a joint remediation plan for the Sonora River, Bacanuchi.”
In their statement, the committees considered that “it is unacceptable that meetings are held with Grupo México without first listening and dialoguing with the affected communities, violating the victims’ right to participation recognized in the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice (of 2020) and in recommendation 50/2024 of the National Human Rights Commission.”
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘
fbq(‘init’, ‘133913093805922’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Contact’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Donate’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘FindLocation’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Lead’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Search’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Subscribe’, {value: ‘0.00’, currency: ‘MXN’, predicted_ltv: ‘0.00’});
fbq(‘track’, ‘ViewContent’);
#dialogue #people #affected #pollution #Sonora #River #Bárcena
–
**What specific mechanisms can be implemented to ensure meaningful community participation and oversight in the long-term monitoring and evaluation of the Sonora River remediation efforts?**
## Interview: Dialogue and Remediation in the Wake of Sonora River Contamination
**Introduction:**
Welcome to World Today News, where we delve into crucial issues impacting our planet. Today, we’re discussing the ongoing situation regarding the contamination of the Sonora River in Mexico, ten years after a significant spill by Grupo Mexico. We’re joined by two esteemed guests: [Guest 1 Name], representing the Sonora River Basin Committees and [Guest 2 Name], an environmental law expert.
**Section 1: The Need for Dialogue**
* **Host**: Ms. [Guest 1 Name], your organization has been vocal about the need for dialog between communities affected by the Sonora River contamination and the government. Can you elaborate on why this direct engagement is so crucial in addressing this environmental disaster?
* **Host**: Ms. [Guest 2 Name], from a legal perspective, what are the precedents and frameworks that support the involvement of affected communities in environmental remediation efforts?
**Section 2: Concerns about Transparency and Inclusivity**
* **Host**: Ms. [Guest 1 Name], the Sonora River Basin Committees expressed concern that an agreement was reached between SEMARNAT and Grupo Mexico without their consultation. How does this exclusionary approach impact the trust between communities and the authorities?
* **Host**: Ms. [Guest 2 Name], what are the potential legal ramifications if environmental decisions are made without adequately considering the voices and concerns of those directly impacted by the pollution?
**Section 3: Moving Forward: Remediation and Accountability**
* **Host**: Ms.[Guest 1 Name], what are the concrete steps you envision being taken in the dialog process to ensure a comprehensive and effective remediation plan for the Sonora River? How can the community participate in designing and monitoring this plan?
* **Host**: Ms. [Guest 2 Name], what are the key elements that should be included in a successful remediation plan from a legal and environmental standpoint? Should there be specific provisions for holding responsible parties accountable for past damages and future prevention?
**Conclusion**:
* **Host**: We’ve discussed the complexities surrounding the Sonora River contamination and the crucial need for inclusive dialog. Ms. [Guest 1 Name], any closing thoughts on what communities hope to achieve through this dialog process?
* **Host**: Ms. [Guest 2 Name], what are your hopes for the future regarding environmental responsibility and community engagement in Mexico, based on the lessons learned from this particular case?
Thank you both for joining us today and shedding light on this critical issue.
**Important Notes**:
* This is a template, and further research on the guests and tailoring the questions to their expertise is essential.
* Encourage guests to provide specific examples and anecdotes to make the discussion more engaging.
* Emphasize the need for respectful and constructive dialog throughout the interview.
