A father from Wuhan, mainland China, took his 5-year-old son to court because he was dissatisfied with the monthly maintenance fee of 2,200 yuan (approximately NT $ 9,816). (Schematic diagram / pexel upside down)
–
A father in Wuhan, mainland China, sued his 5-year-old son Xiao Yin (pseudonym) as dissatisfied with the monthly maintenance fee of 2,200 yuan (approximately NT $ 9,816); he said that he has remarried and that there is an unborn child. The child, who is not really able to afford it, demands that the child support be reduced to RMB 1,000 (approximately NT $ 4,461). After the trial, the judge found that the new marriage and new pregnancy were a subjective choice and a non-objective reason, and the pursuit of one’s own happiness should not increase the burden on Xiao Yin’s mother, so she rejected the appeal.
According to the continental media “Strit Metropolis Daily”, Xiao Yin’s father said that due to the decline in his income during the epidemic, along with remarriage and childbirth, the number of people who needed to be raised and cared for has risen (about NT $ 9,816) to RMB 1,000 (about NT $ 4,461).
However, the actual investigation shows that Xiao Yin’s father has a stable income and is not affected by the epidemic, and the actual expenses of tuition, medical treatment, living expenses, etc. of the 5-year-old son exceeds 4,000 yuan per month (about NT $ 17,849), which is much higher than the maintenance fee of 2,200 yuan (about NT $ 9,816). Xiao Yin’s mother revealed that after the two divorced, her ex-husband rarely came to see the children and sometimes failed to support the children, which forced her to go to court for execution. .
After the trial, the Wuhan East Lake New Technology Development Zone People’s Court judge found the alimony amount to be determined by the court mediation. Reducing alimony goes against the principle of good faith and will inevitably increase the burden on Xiao Yin’s mother.
Furthermore, Xiao Yin’s father did not provide evidence of his income reduction: he worked in a state-owned enterprise and had a stable income, while Xiao Yin’s mother provided relevant evidence to prove that Xiao Yin’s monthly taxes, the medical expenses, living expenses and other actual expenses were in excess of RMB 4,000 (approximately NT $ 17,849).
The judge pointed out that Xiao Yin’s father proposed to remarry, but his son was not born, and the re-marriage and re-marriage were subjective choices and non-objective reasons. The pursuit of one’s own happiness should not increase the weight of Xiao Yin’s mother and reduce the quality of life of Xiao Yin’s growth. , thus rejecting Xiao Yin’s father’s request for a reduction in child support.
– –
