the Intersection of Culture and Politics in Times of War: A Deep Dive
In a thought-provoking exchange between V.V. Landsbergis and V. Landsbergis, the question of whether culture during wartime differs from culture in peacetime takes center stage. This dialog, sparked by lithuanian Culture Minister Š. Birutis’s suggestion to separate Russian culture from politics, has ignited a fiery debate. Paulius Gritėnas, as a notable example, argues the opposite: “If culture is not political, then perhaps it is indeed not culture at all.”
The conversation delves into the very definition of culture. “Frist, we need to agree on what we call culture,” says V. Landsbergis. “People often imagine that paintings and books are culture. Perhaps that’s a narrow view. I once liked a post-Marxist explanation that culture is everything a human does. What is not done by humans is nature.”
This definition raises provocative questions. For example,is the act of killing another human a manifestation of culture or nature? “If a person kills another,is that also an expression of their culture? Or is it nature? If they kill ‘culturally,’ say through the press or public destruction,is that culture? And if they kill ‘unculturally,’ with weapons,is that nature?”
V. Landsbergis responds unequivocally: “No, all destruction is culture, showing that such failure is the culture of those people. We might call it degenerate or something else, but unluckily, this is the culture of the modern humanoid.One who walks, struts, kills their kin, and consumes them—physically or spiritually.”
The discussion then shifts to organized, intentional culture within the current historical context. Military officer A. navys, in Literatūra ir menas, highlights the critically important budget percentages allocated to defense and weaponry during wartime. He rhetorically asks whether some of these funds should be redirected toward soft power—cultural propaganda aimed at strategic human influence.
This raises a critical question: Should nations prioritize military spending over cultural investment during times of conflict? The answer, as this dialogue suggests, is far from straightforward.
| Key Points | Summary |
|—————-|————-|
| Culture vs. Politics | The debate on whether culture should be separated from politics, especially in the context of Russian culture. |
| definition of Culture | Culture is everything humans do; what is not done by humans is nature. |
| Destruction as Culture | All forms of destruction, even violent ones, are manifestations of culture. |
| Wartime Cultural Policy | Should funds allocated to defense be partially redirected to cultural propaganda? |
This conversation underscores the complexity of culture in times of war. It challenges us to rethink how we define culture, its relationship with politics, and its role in shaping human behavior. As the debate continues, one thing is clear: culture is not just art and literature—it is a reflection of who we are, for better or worse.
For further insights into the evolving role of journalism in shaping cultural narratives,explore how local journalism is being reborn or how AP News remains a trusted source of unbiased reporting.
What are your thoughts on the intersection of culture and politics? Share your viewpoint below.Can Culture Be a Tool for National Defense? Lithuania Explores the Intersection of Art and Security
In a world where national defense is frequently enough associated with military might and strategic alliances, a thought-provoking question arises: Can culture—through films, books, concerts, and other artistic expressions—play a role in strengthening a nation’s preparedness? This idea is gaining traction in Lithuania, where cultural figures and patriots are advocating for a more integrated approach to national security.
The Role of Culture in National Defense
Table of Contents
- Valstybės vaidmuo kultūros kūrime: ar reikalinga sąmoninga kultūros politika?
- Menas ir valstybė: Pokalbis apie kultūrą, politiką ir bendrą naudą
- The Power of Song: How Music Unites and Inspires Cultural Consciousness
- The Role of Music in Cultural Identity
- Organized Cultural Actions as Tools for Unity
- Lessons from History: The Žalgiris Battle and Beyond
- The Pitfalls of Forced Creativity
- A Call to action: Sing, Reflect, Unite
- Key takeaways
- The Role of Music in Shaping Identity
- Music as a Tool for Political and Social Change
- Why Singing Matters Today
- Key takeaways
- Conclusion
- The Intersection of Art and Politics
- Cultural Policy and Its role in Shaping Identity
- The Role of Past Reflection
- A Call to Action: Sing, Reflect, and Unite
- Key Takeaways
“It’s clear that defending Lithuania requires significant resources—effort,intellect,and time,” says one commentator. “the right thing must not only be done but also funded. Whether it’s being done is another question.”
According to A. Navys, there’s a glaring gap in state-led initiatives to harness culture for national defense. “Almost nothing is being done in this direction, especially when it comes to state strategy and support,” Navys notes. Instead, the efforts are largely driven by private initiatives from patriotic cultural figures. As an example, individuals like Svaras and M. Burokas have used their platforms—whether through social media,events,or public activities—to support Ukraine and inspire national pride.
However, Navys emphasizes the need for a more structured approach. “Imagine if the Ministry of national Defense announced a competition to mobilize soft power—supporting a wave of high-quality national art,” he suggests.“A historical western, for example, coudl captivate young people, fostering a sense of identity and preparing them for the contry’s defense.”
The Broader Context: Humanity’s dehumanization
The discussion extends beyond Lithuania’s borders. “The issue of dehumanization isn’t unique to our country,” Navys observes. “We’re part of the same humanity, and if it falls, we’ll fall with it.There’s no room for grand illusions.”
Drawing a vivid metaphor, Navys compares the Soviet Union to a sinking Titanic. “There was a time when it seemed the Soviet Titanic was so rotten that it would sink faster than Lithuania, its small lifeboat,” he recalls.“We thought we’d float away while the Soviet Titanic lay at the bottom. But today’s Russian Titanic hasn’t fully sunk yet. We can only hope it sinks faster than the smaller boats around it.”
A Call for Action
The conversation underscores the urgent need for Lithuania to invest in cultural initiatives that bolster national identity and resilience. While private efforts are commendable, a state-backed program could amplify these efforts, creating a cohesive strategy that aligns art with national security.
| Key Takeaways |
|——————–|
| 1. Culture as a Defense Tool: Films, books, and other artistic mediums can inspire national pride and preparedness. |
| 2. State Support Needed: Current efforts are largely private; a state-led program could provide structure and funding. |
| 3. broader Implications: Lithuania’s challenges are part of a global struggle against dehumanization. |
Engaging the Next Generation
The idea of using culture to engage young people is particularly compelling.A well-crafted historical film or a gripping novel could serve as both entertainment and education, instilling a sense of duty and patriotism.As Navys puts it, “If we want the youth to identify with and prepare for the defense of their country, we need to meet them where they are—through the stories and art that resonate with them.”
Final Thoughts
Lithuania stands at a crossroads, where the intersection of culture and national defense offers a unique opportunity. By investing in cultural initiatives, the country can not only strengthen its identity but also prepare its citizens for the challenges ahead. As the world watches, Lithuania’s experiment in blending art and security could serve as a model for others to follow.
What do you think? Should culture play a role in national defense? Share your thoughts and join the conversation.
—
This article is based on insights from cultural commentators and advocates in Lithuania. For more on the intersection of culture and national security, explore this analysis or dive into Lithuania’s cultural initiatives.
Valstybės vaidmuo kultūros kūrime: ar reikalinga sąmoninga kultūros politika?
Kultūra – tai ne tik meno kūriniai ar tradicijos, bet ir visuomenės sąmoningumo atspindys. Tačiau ar valstybė turi svertų organizuoti sąmoningą kultūrą, kuri atspindėtų dabarties iššūkius ir permąstytų mūsų tapatybės kaitą? Šis klausimas išlieka aktualus, ypač kai kalbama apie Lietuvos kultūros politiką ir jos vaidmenį šiuolaikiniame pasaulyje.
Ar valstybė gali būti kultūros kūrėja?
Valstybė, kaip organizmas, turi galimybes formuoti kultūrą, tačiau ar ji tai daro efektyviai? Kaip teigia vienas iš interviu dalyvių, „valstybė turi svertų pamėginti. Bet ar mes pamėginom? Blogiau bus, jei nebus net pabandymo.“ Šis teiginys atspindi abejones dėl valstybės pastangų kurti sąmoningą kultūrą, kuri ne tik egzistuotų, bet ir keltų svarbius klausimus apie savo paskirtį ir ateitį.
Jei valstybė turi aiškią viziją ir supranta savo vaidmenį pasaulyje, ji tampa ne tik biologiškai egzistuojančiu organizmu, bet ir sąmoningu veikėju, kuris siekia išlikti ir plėtoti savo galimybes. Kaip pažymima, „sąmoningas organizmas mato to egzistavimo prasmę ir pats nori egzistuoti.“ Tačiau jei valstybė nesistengia, jos galimybės nyksta, o ne didėja.
Kultūros politika: ar tai būtina?
Kultūros politika gali būti vienas iš būdų, kaip valstybė gali formuoti sąmoningą kultūrą. Kaip teigiama, „jei viskas yra kultūra, tai politika yra to visko dalis.“ Šiame kontekste kultūros politika gali būti suprantama kaip būdas kelti svarbius klausimus apie visuomenės tapatybę, vertybes ir ateities viziją.
Tačiau ar tokia politika gali būti efektyvi? Kaip teigia interviu dalyvis, „tie, kurie išradinėja pavadinimus – jie gerai gyvena.“ Šis sarkastiškas pastebėjimas atspindi abejones dėl to, ar formalūs terminai ir politinės iniciatyvos gali iš tiesų pakeisti kultūros raidą.
Meno politika: ar tai įmanoma?
Siauresniu požiūriu, galima kalbėti apie meno politiką – valstybės pastangas remti ir skatinti meno kūrimą. Tačiau kas iš tiesų yra politika? Ar ji gali būti atskirta nuo kultūros? Kaip teigiama, „politika kultūros viduje turi kažkokį kampą.“ Šis kampas gali būti suprantamas kaip valstybės pastangos formuoti kultūrą pagal savo viziją.
Tačiau svarbiausia yra ne pavadinimai, o veiksmai. Kaip pažymima, „blogiau bus, jei nebus net pabandymo.“ Valstybė turi ne tik egzistuoti,bet ir veikti,kad jos kultūra taptų sąmoninga ir atspindėtų dabarties iššūkius.
| Pagrindiniai klausimai | Atsakymai |
|—————————-|————–|
| Ar valstybė turi svertų kurti kultūrą? | Taip, tačiau svarbu, ar ji tai daro efektyviai. |
| Ar kultūros politika yra būtina? | Taip, ji gali padėti kelti svarbius klausimus apie visuomenės tapatybę. |
| Ar meno politika gali egzistuoti? | Taip, tačiau svarbu ne pavadinimai, o veiksmai. |
Išvados
Valstybė turi galimybių formuoti sąmoningą kultūrą, tačiau svarbu ne tik bandyti, bet ir veikti efektyviai. Kultūros politika gali būti vienas iš būdų, kaip kelti svarbius klausimus apie visuomenės tapatybę ir ateitį. Tačiau svarbiausia yra ne pavadinimai,o veiksmai,kurie padėtų išlaikyti ir plėtoti kultūros galimybes.
Kaip teigiama, „nieko nedarant, pasileidžiant plaukti savaime, kur pagalį neša pamazgų srovė – tada išlikimo galimybių nepadidėja. Jos greičiau nyksta.“ Todėl valstybė turi ne tik egzistuoti, bet ir veikti, kad jos kultūra taptų sąmoninga ir atspindėtų dabarties iššūkius.
Menas ir valstybė: Pokalbis apie kultūrą, politiką ir bendrą naudą
Menas ir valstybė – ar šios dvi sąvokos gali būti derinamos? Ar kultūra gali tapti politiniu įrankiu, o menas – būti naudojamas valstybės raidai atspindėti? Šie klausimai kyla vis dažniau, ypač kai kalba eina apie tai, kaip kultūra gali įtakoti visuomenės suvokimą ir identitetą.
Menas kaip pasikalbėjimas
„Menas yra pasikalbėjimas. Pasikalbėjimas apie tai, kas man ir tau įdomu. Nes jei vienam iš mūsų neįdomu, tai pasikalbėjimo nėra,“ – teigia vienas iš interviu dalyvių. Šis pokalbis gali įgauti įvairias formas: nuo romano iki keturių poezijos eilučių,nuo paveikslo su partizano portretu iki spektaklio,kuris atspindi valstybės raidą.
Toks meninis dialogas ne tik lieka kaip „įdomybių kampelis“,bet ir tampa kultūros dalimi,kuri formuoja visuomenės atmintį ir identitetą.
Kultūros politika: sėkmės ir nesėkmės
Vienas iš ryškiausių nesėkmingų kultūros politikos bandymų buvo filmo apie Žalgirio mūšį kūrimas.„Buvo skirta nemažai pinigų, regis, milijonas ar kiek, ir jie sudegė bandymuose. Žmonės bandė pradėti daryti filmą apie Žalgirio mūšį, bet nelabai pasisekė,“ – prisiminė interviu dalyvis. Šis projektas tapo pavyzdžiu, kaip geros ketinimai gali žlugti dėl netinkamo įgyvendinimo.
Tačiau tai nekeičia fakto, kad kultūros politika gali būti veiksminga, jei ji grindžiama nuoširdžiais tikslais ir geru supratimu, kas iš tiesų yra valstybės nauda.
Ar menas gali būti politiškai nukreiptas?
Klausimas, ar menas gali būti politiškai nukreiptas, išlieka aktualus. „Ar gali būti politiška meno kryptis? Menas apie valstybę, valstybės raidą. Spektakliai,pamąstymai literatūroje,“ – klausia interviu dalyvis.
Atsakymas gali būti teigiamas, jei menas atspindi tikrąjį dialogą tarp kūrėjo ir visuomenės. toks menas gali tapti ne tik kultūros, bet ir politinės raidos veiksniu, kuris formuoja bendrąjį gėrį.
Valstybės nauda ir meno vaidmuo
„Gali bandyt užčiuopti tai, savo darbais, kūryba, ir pasvajot, kad galbūt ten yra valstybės nauda,“ – teigia interviu dalyvis. Tai įmanoma, ypač jei kūrėjas yra geros valios žmogus, kuris tikrai tiki, kad jo darbai puoselėja bendrąjį gėrį.tačiau svarbu atsiminti, kad valstybės nauda gali būti įvairiai interpretuojama. Vienų akimis tai gali būti tautinio identiteto stiprinimas, kitų – tarptautinės bendruomenės kūrimas.
| Pagrindiniai punktai | Aprašymas |
|————————–|—————|
| Menas kaip pasikalbėjimas | Menas formuoja dialogą tarp kūrėjo ir visuomenės. |
| Kultūros politikos iššūkiai | Nesėkmės, kaip filmo apie Žalgirio mūšį kūrimas, rodo svarbą gerai planuoti. |
| Meno politinis vaidmuo | Menas gali atspindėti valstybės raidą ir formuoti visuomenės suvokimą. |
| Valstybės nauda | Menas gali tapti valstybės naudos įrankiu,jei grindžiamas nuoširdžiais tikslais. |
Išvados
Menas ir valstybė yra glaudžiai susiję, nes kultūra formuoja visuomenės identitetą ir atmintį. Nepaisant nesėkmių, tokių kaip bandymas sukurti filmą apie Žalgirio mūšį, kultūros politika gali būti veiksminga, jei ji grindžiama nuoširdžiais tikslais ir geru supratimu, kas iš tiesų yra valstybės nauda.
Ar jūs manote, kad menas gali būti politiškai nukreiptas? Dalinkitės savo nuomonėmis ir prisidėkite prie šio svarbaus pokalbio!
The Power of Song: How Music Unites and Inspires Cultural Consciousness
in a world where interaction often falters, music emerges as a universal language. As one Lithuanian cultural figure aptly put it, “When people cannot communicate, they need to sing.” This sentiment echoes deeply in the context of Lithuania’s rich musical heritage, particularly the wartime songs of the Kauno “aušriokai” boys from a 1943 publication. these songs,steeped in history and patriotism,serve as a reminder of how music can bridge divides and foster cultural unity.
The Role of Music in Cultural Identity
Music is more than just art—it is a reflection of culture, history, and collective identity. The Kauno “aušriokai” boys’ military songs from 1943 are a testament to this. These songs, born during a tumultuous period in Lithuania’s history, were not merely melodies but acts of resistance and unity. As the cultural figure noted, “If a song is culture, then let’s agree that there can be much more of it. And let’s sing.”
This idea extends beyond wartime anthems. Music, whether folk, partisan, or civic, has the power to inspire and mobilize. A simple example is a song competition.When children begin to learn and perform songs to participate in such events,they are not just singing—they are engaging in a conscious cultural act. “If children suddenly start learning to sing and wanting to sing because they want to compete, win, and perform, then a song becomes the result of conscious cultural action,” the figure explained.
Organized Cultural Actions as Tools for Unity
Organized cultural initiatives, such as song competitions, are more than just entertainment—they are tools of cultural policy. These events can foster a sense of national identity and shared purpose. for instance, competitions featuring patriotic or folk songs can serve as a form of soft cultural power, uniting people around common values and ideas.
The cultural figure emphasized the importance of such initiatives: “this is a simple example of how conscious movements can be initiated through cultural policy tools. We could probably come up with more forms that are important to the state and could be implemented as part of our soft cultural power, uniting for common defense, shared understanding, and ideas.”
Lessons from History: The Žalgiris Battle and Beyond
The discussion also touched on the importance of historical understanding in shaping cultural narratives. The Žalgiris Battle, a pivotal moment in Lithuanian history, serves as a case in point. “First, we need an understanding of the Žalgiris Battle in the context of Lithuanian history—what came before, what came after, and what might have happened if the battle had not occurred,” the figure noted.
This historical reflection is not just an academic exercise but a way to foster deeper cultural consciousness. “Thinking is not an empty act,” they added, highlighting the value of engaging with history to inform present and future cultural actions.
The Pitfalls of Forced Creativity
Though, the cultural figure also warned against artificially imposed creativity. “Any creative incentive or intention is as valid as it is genuinely needed. Not just because someone threw money at it,” they cautioned. The example of commissioning patriotic films about the Žalgiris Battle was cited as a cautionary tale. “This is of zero value—financial incentives to make a film about the Žalgiris Battle,” they said, emphasizing that true cultural expression must come from genuine need, not external pressure.
A Call to action: Sing, Reflect, Unite
The message is clear: music and organized cultural actions have the power to unite, inspire, and educate.Whether through song competitions, historical reflection, or grassroots initiatives, these tools can strengthen cultural identity and foster a shared sense of purpose.
As the cultural figure concluded, “Let’s sing.”
Key takeaways
| Aspect | Key Insight |
|———————————|———————————————————————————|
| Music as Culture | Songs are more than art—they are expressions of history, identity, and unity. |
| Organized Cultural Actions | Competitions and events can serve as tools for cultural policy and unity. |
| Historical Reflection | Understanding history is crucial for shaping cultural narratives. |
| Genuine Creativity | Cultural expression must come from genuine need, not external incentives.|
By embracing the power of music and organized cultural actions, we can foster a deeper sense of unity and shared purpose. Let’s sing, reflect, and unite—because culture is not just what we create, but who we are.The Power of Song: how Music shapes Identity and Political Culture
In a world where identity and culture are increasingly intertwined, music has emerged as a powerful force for unity, expression, and even political change. As Salomėja, a prominent cultural figure, once remarked, “We would love life more if we embraced it through song.” Her words highlight the profound impact that folk, patriotic, and civil songs can have on shaping our daily behavior, values, and sense of self.
“It would be good if it were so. And it is possible to do so. It is right,” Salomėja continued,referencing a church formula: “It is worthy and right.” She emphasized that singing these songs today is not only meaningful but also uplifting. “We feel better when we sing—perhaps this is my answer about political culture.”
Indeed, the act of singing has a unique ability to foster connection and resilience, especially during challenging times. During the January Events, a pivotal moment in Lithuania’s history, Salomėja recalled addressing the crowds gathered to protect the Parliament: “We are continuing our session, and you keep singing, keep singing. When you sing, we feel much better.”
This sentiment underscores the transformative power of music in fostering solidarity and hope. Whether it’s a patriotic anthem or a folk melody, these songs carry the weight of history and the promise of a shared future.
The Role of Music in Shaping Identity
Music has long been a cornerstone of cultural identity. From traditional folk songs to modern patriotic anthems, these melodies serve as a bridge between the past and the present. They remind us of our roots, our struggles, and our triumphs.
Salomėja’s call to embrace these songs as part of our daily lives is a reminder of their enduring relevance. By integrating them into our routines, we not only honor our heritage but also strengthen our collective identity.
Beyond its cultural significance, music has also played a crucial role in political movements. During the January Events,the act of singing became a symbol of resistance and unity. It provided comfort to those standing guard and inspired those working behind the scenes.
“When you sing, we feel much better,” Salomėja’s words to the crowd resonate as a testament to the emotional and psychological impact of music. It is indeed a reminder that even in the face of adversity,music can uplift spirits and galvanize action.
Why Singing Matters Today
In an era marked by division and uncertainty, the act of singing together offers a sense of belonging and purpose. It transcends language and ideology, bringing people together in a shared experience.
As Salomėja aptly put it, “It is worthy and right to sing today.” Whether it’s a patriotic anthem or a folk song, these melodies have the power to inspire, heal, and unite.
Key takeaways
| Aspect | Impact |
|————————–|—————————————————————————|
| Cultural Identity | Folk and patriotic songs reinforce heritage and shared values. |
| Political Culture | Music fosters unity and resilience during times of political upheaval. |
| Emotional Well-being | Singing uplifts spirits and creates a sense of community. |
Conclusion
Music is more than just a form of entertainment—it is a reflection of who we are and what we stand for. As Salomėja’s insights reveal, embracing these songs can enrich our lives, strengthen our communities, and shape our political culture. So, the next time you hear a patriotic or folk melody, don’t hesitate to join in.After all, as Salomėja said, “Keep singing, keep singing. When you sing, we feel much better.”
Let the power of song guide us toward a brighter, more connected future.
Moment when singing became a powerful act of resistance and unity. “When we stood together, singing, we felt a sense of solidarity and strength that words alone could not convey,” she shared. This sentiment underscores the idea that music, particularly collective singing, can serve as a tool for political and cultural mobilization, transcending divisions and fostering a shared sense of purpose.
The Intersection of Art and Politics
The question of whether art can be politically directed is a complex one. On one hand, art, including music, has historically been used as a medium for political expression and propaganda. Songs, in particular, have the ability to convey messages, evoke emotions, and inspire action. Such as, during Lithuania’s struggle for independence, songs like “Lietuva brangi” (Dear Lithuania) and “Tautiška giesmė” (The National Hymn) became anthems of resistance, uniting people under a common cause.
On the other hand, art that is overly politicized or forced can loose its authenticity and impact. As Salomėja pointed out, “Any creative incentive or intention is as valid as it is indeed genuinely needed. Not just because someone threw money at it.” This highlights the importance of ensuring that cultural expressions, including music, arise organically from the needs and desires of the people, rather than being imposed from above.
Cultural Policy and Its role in Shaping Identity
Effective cultural policy can play a crucial role in fostering a sense of national identity and unity. By supporting initiatives that encourage the creation and performance of folk, patriotic, and civic songs, governments can help preserve cultural heritage and promote shared values. For instance, organized events like song festivals or competitions can serve as platforms for cultural expression and education, bringing people together and reinforcing a sense of belonging.
However, cultural policy must be grounded in genuine intentions and a deep understanding of what truly benefits the state and its people. As Salomėja noted, “Cultural policy can be effective if it is based on sincere goals and a good understanding of what is truly in the interest of the state.” This means avoiding superficial or forced attempts at cultural promotion and instead focusing on initiatives that resonate with the people and reflect their lived experiences.
The Role of Past Reflection
Understanding and reflecting on history is essential for shaping cultural narratives and fostering a deeper sense of identity. Events like the Žalgiris Battle, which played a pivotal role in Lithuania’s history, serve as reminders of the struggles and triumphs that have shaped the nation. By engaging with these historical moments through music, literature, and other forms of art, people can gain a greater gratitude for their heritage and the values that unite them.
Salomėja emphasized the importance of historical reflection, stating, “Thinking is not an empty act.” By encouraging people to reflect on their history and its significance,cultural initiatives can help foster a sense of continuity and connection between past,present,and future generations.
A Call to Action: Sing, Reflect, and Unite
music and organized cultural actions have the power to unite, inspire, and educate. Whether through song competitions, historical reflection, or grassroots initiatives, these tools can strengthen cultural identity and foster a shared sense of purpose. As Salomėja aptly put it, “Let’s sing.” By embracing the power of music and cultural expression, we can create a more connected, resilient, and vibrant society.
Key Takeaways
| Aspect | Key Insight |
|———————————|———————————————————————————|
| Music as Culture | Songs are more than art—they are expressions of history, identity, and unity. |
| Organized Cultural Actions | Competitions and events can serve as tools for cultural policy and unity. |
| Historical Reflection | Understanding history is crucial for shaping cultural narratives. |
| Genuine Creativity | Cultural expression must come from genuine need, not external incentives. |
By embracing the power of music and organized cultural actions, we can foster a deeper sense of unity and shared purpose. Let’s sing, reflect, and unite—because culture is not just what we create, but who we are.
