Surprisingly, it refers not only to the crimes for which De Pauw was explicitly convicted, but also to some of the behaviors he exhibited towards other women. The civil court also sees those behaviors as “further evidence of abuse of power and transgressive behavior in a professional context”. The judge also criticized the fact that De Pauw, faced with his behavior by the VRT, “seemed to show no sense of guilt and was unwilling to take any responsibility”.
Related posts:
Bruce Springsteen to Perform at Vélodrome in Marseille as Part of European Tour
Zodiac Forecast Tomorrow September 8, 2021: Your Aries, Gemini, and Taurus Enter Imaginative Time
Maria Teresa Ruta unrecognizable, the fault of the surgical procedure. The haters give her no respi...
Laura Chiatti and Marco Bocci: A Love Story Amidst Rumors and Exes