Jakarta –
Domestic violence cases (Domestic violence) in South Jakarta (Jaksel), which the RIS allegedly entrusted to his ex-wife and two children, has entered a new chapter. RIS brought his ex-wife back with the initials KEY to Polda Metro Jaya.
RIS lawyer Hendri Kurnia said KEY was sued for two cases. KEY was sued for allegedly misappropriating and sharing personal data.
“Yes, there are two reports related to misappropriation and disclosure of personal data,” Hendri told reporters on Wednesday (12/28/2022).
The report was registered in LP/B/6590/XII/2022/SPKT/POLDA METRO JAYA with cases of misappropriation and LP/B/6597/XII/2022/SPKT/POLDA METRO JAYA with cases of transmission of documents or information telematics belonging to other persons without rights. The two cases were reported on the same day.
“Yes (different reports), separated today,” she said.
Meanwhile, RIS has asked his ex-wife not to upload any videos that depict child exploitation. Besides, he said, it was made that his son hated him.
“Because in the end I still support them in the right way. It’s a shame for the children psychologically if they are constantly under pressure like that, at that time they went to school while in places my ex-wife said I was rude,” he told reporters .
RIS is not yet a suspect
Previously, the case of domestic violence committed by RIS against his ex-wife and two children was under investigation. Police stated that there was a criminal element to the case reported by RIS’s ex-wife, but RIS was not named a suspect.
“There are still witnesses reported. But this has been looked into by others, we’ve looked into other people,” South Jakarta Metropolitan Police public relations chief Nurma Dewi said when contacted. detik com, Friday (23/12).
The case has moved on to the preliminary phase. The police found a criminal element in the report Domestic violence father beat the child.
“There’s a criminal element. If you get a fingerprint, it’s already a criminal element,” Nurma said.
Nurma continued, RIS was threatened with being charged with 2 items. Namely the article 76C of the law 35 of 2014 and the article 44 of the PKDRT law.
See also the video: Father’s motives revealed with child genital mutilation in Tasikmalaya
(rd/haf)
