/View.information/ Selecting a pacesetter from the complete get together is a path to dictatorship. The battle shouldn’t be for one’s head, however for concepts
Velislava Dureva is a publicist, essayist, political analyst, documentary filmmaker; one of many founders of the Membership for Help of Glasnost and Reconstruction, an everlasting dissident. Born in Plovdiv. Graduated from Sofia College with a level in journalism. Earlier than November 10, 2 of her books, 2 screenplays have been banned. After 1989, she labored within the village of “Duma”, from the place she was fired a number of occasions. Writer of over 2000 publications.
– What’s going to occur on the congress on June 16?
– I can not predict. As for the agenda, the Nationwide Council proposed to submit, along with the opposite paperwork, the proposal of 25 folks to alter the Statute. It stays to be seen whether or not it is going to be on the agenda of the congress, it isn’t recognized how the delegates will vote. It is going to be proposed as a part of the agenda and the advice of the Nationwide Meeting to drop the triggering of a direct election process. What occurs subsequent will depend on the acceptance of those proposals. The battle shouldn’t be for one’s head, however for concepts and insurance policies. It’s not about chopping off Nineveh’s head! It signifies that Cornelia Ninova got down to substitute the ideological and historic essence of the BSP.
The concept of conservative socialism and left conservatism launched by her is an enormous mistake. What’s conservative socialism? Picket iron.
You can’t change the ideological essence of a 130-year-old get together due to somebody’s insinuations. This about left-wing conservatism and conservative socialism was invented by Rosen Karadimov, most certainly to drag the BSP out of its footwear, to place it in a distinct segment that’s not its personal.
The very statute of the BSP, adopted in 2016, which brought on the complete state of affairs through which the get together finds itself, can also be an issue. The best absurdity of this statute is that
the BSP congress has the best to dissolve the get together, however not the best to elect a boss.
– Is not it a danger to consider altering the chief on the eve of such essential elections because the native ones?
– In no case is it time for direct elections of a pacesetter. Thus, as an alternative of a consolidated BSP, it’ll seem within the native elections splashed and damaged. Why ought to all this be introduced up in any respect? The statute permits the Nationwide Meeting to elect an individual to function chairman of the BSP. He doesn’t essentially even should be one of many present Vice-Presidents, he might not even be a member of the Govt Bureau. And the elected to complete this chief’s time period till the common conference, when there shall be a full cycle of report and election. That’s there’s a chance that the subsequent huge bother for the BSP could possibly be spared, as a result of if it goes down within the native elections, I do not even need to take into consideration what would possibly occur.
– Why did the BSP in Could for the second time lose what have been thought of to be gained elections?
– A variety of errors have been made. The primary huge mistake was leaving the Nationwide Meeting. For 3 months, the parliamentary group of the BSP resided beneath the extra-parliamentary pear curve. Within the absence of the BSP, the parliament adopted 37 legal guidelines, of which eight have been ratified, one among which is for the entry of North Macedonia into NATO. Among the many allegedly insignificant legal guidelines adopted with out the BSP are the Legislation on Private Knowledge, the Electoral Code, the legal guidelines on territorial planning, on water, on concessions, on commerce secrets and techniques, on European funds, on the judiciary, on non secular denominations, on financial institution chapter, on native taxes and charges, for anti-money laundering measures. Furthermore, parliamentary management is the day of the opposition, and the BSP missed 12 Fridays and left the ruling get together uncontrolled. That’s within the first days after leaving the parliament it had an impact, then it grew to become a defect. In the long run, the BSP excluded itself from parliamentary life, from legislative exercise, from parliamentary management. It demonstrates that it may be finished with out parliamentary opposition. And why not with out parliament?!
Beneath the stress of Ninova BSP deserted the structure,
is delegitimized as a parliamentary get together.
The second mistake is that the BSP determined to switch the success and mannequin of the presidential elections to the European ones to be able to provoke early parliamentary elections. Nevertheless, the revolutionary state of affairs and the wave of protests, which ought to have carried away GERB like a summer season downpour, remained within the BSP’s fantasies.
The third mistake, reflecting extreme political illiteracy, is the struggle in opposition to PES president Stanishev, which discredits the socialist household to which the BSP belongs. By no means within the final 30 years has there been such a hysterical, scheming, undignified marketing campaign in opposition to one individual within the BSP. False dividing strains are always drawn. A whole disregard for the need of the socialists was demonstrated, already in the course of the nomination for the Eurolists. Ninova threw out Stanishev, who had 235 nominations, and in 4th place Ivo Hristov warmed up with 2 nominations!
The Nationwide Council of the BSP was methodically demonized. This line of discrediting the NA is supported by figures, individuals and media that don’t have anything to do with the BSP, not less than formally, such because the Epicenter of Mrs. V., who can also be the manager director of the Institute for Methods and Evaluation. In line with this institute, the Nationwide Meeting of the BSP is a non-representative physique and the separation between it and the chief Ninova is imminent.
I ask then – who leads the BSP, who determines the get together’s coverage, who and the place makes the selections? At Positano 20 or some place else?
– Why is Sergey Stanishev so overthrown? Why is it not the chief of the PES, however the younger Petar Vitanov, who’s the chief of the BSP delegation within the EP?
– Nobody can reply you. That is one other determination, an indication of political illiteracy. As an alternative of Stanishev, the one skilled politician within the BSP delegation to the European Parliament, who is aware of the mechanisms of European politics, Petar Vitanov was chosen because the chief of our delegation within the EP – a succesful younger man, who, nonetheless, merely doesn’t know these mechanisms.
– Is there a trump card that may give the BSP an opportunity to win the native elections in Plovdiv?
– Alas, I can not see. As we nicely know, the complete municipal administration is within the arms of GERB, which controls the complete native authorities. In fact, within the European elections, the BSP made critical inroads – it misplaced the election, however gained one MP, gained 50,000 extra votes and got here near its greatest European election consequence since 2009.
That’s he has this opportunity, the massive drawback is to not waste it with the so-called direct election of the president and the inner get together battles.
– Will the BSP keep away from turning into a pacesetter get together?
– It ought to be prevented as a result of a pacesetter BSP has nothing to do with its historical past, character, essence. It’s vital to revive the collective starting of the BSP management. Within the get together, leaderism, unilateral actions have been by no means accepted. BSP shouldn’t be GERB, BSP coverage can’t be a duplicate of GERB coverage. Bulgaria has one Boyko Borisov, we do not want one other.
Having the chairman of the BSP elected by the complete get together sounds very democratic, however it’s a path to dictatorship. Which means the chairman of the get together ought to be positioned above the entire get together, uncontrolled, unbiased of it. Then there shall be no want for congresses or a Nationwide Council.
– If the BSP loses the elections, what’s the subsequent step for Mrs. Ninova?
– If Ms. Ninova continues to be the chairman of the BSP and the native elections are misplaced within the fall, I do not know what dramas will unfold. Apart from, Mrs. Ninova has a behavior of shifting her blame and obligations onto different folks. For instance, she resigned however utilized to proceed controlling the get together. Resigned to remain. And the primary thought was to switch all duty to native constructions.
The BSP ought to present widespread sense, select performing chairman till a daily congress and cease this steady struggle, with the false dividing strains that weaken the get together.
– Is there a consolidating determine for BSP?
– There definitely is, however I would not title a reputation. No matter title I name, the individual shall be spat upon. Such intolerance has by no means existed in BSP. I do know the story and I’m the screenwriter of the one documentary about Traicho Kostov. Then, 70 years in the past, the hysteria ended with a gallows. Now, luckily, they haven’t but began to hold for dissent. Right now there are pointless, impressed collisions, on account of ambition or lack of tradition, intrigues which can be solely to the detriment of the BSP.
#Velislava #Dureva #Conservative #socialism #picket #iron
