–
–
Valentin Vatsev PHOTO: Archive
–
“The reasons are completely clear. But this is not exactly a resignation. Ninova said that her resignation will be announced at the next extraordinary congress, until then she is the current chairman of the party and intends to fulfill all tasks facing the party.” Left-wing analyst Valentin Vatsev told Epicenter that he had asked BSP leader Cornelia Ninova whether she should have resigned. I don’t see anything catastrophic or sensational in her behavior. when taking responsibility “.
Resignation and responsibility are not the same thing, but they are connected. I’m not surprised. But I am surprised by something else – that the Initiative Committee for the Election of the President and the caretaker cabinet may demand the resignation of a party leader – this is extremely unusual! “
Most of her political activity went under the sign of her resignation, Vatsev said. “These things hardly impress her, but it is really surprising that internal party forces, for which we have long known what they are fighting for, and institutions outside her party want her resignation. which she was fighting – the internal party and the non-party party are now merging into a common front – that is, the moment of truth is approaching. speaks clearly, loudly, emphatically and concretely, as there are many facts that have been so far kept secret that need to be put on the table. “
“This silence on her part, which I understand purely humanly, was a political mistake. She was obliged not to keep anything secret, because the battle has been going on for a long time and the truth is an argument in this battle. The battles that are now being fought in the BSP need the whole truth all the time, in a clear and understandable way. If it is deliberately kept silent, yes, it was really wrong. “
“Ninova expected blows from Borissov and received them. The fact that Borisov is no longer prime minister means that he is not as effective in the fight against her, which is why her opponents are able to generalize their positions and call from different directions. In fact, it was in an absolutely impossible position to fight outside its party in the system of power struggle and within its own party, no party can win with such a purulent abscess within itself. First of all, the internal party problems are to be solved and they cannot be kept silent in the name of some all-party hypocritical unanimity. Ninova was silent too much and too long. to put on the table “.
What is the role of Rumen Radev in the battles against Ninova?
“Radev is one of the main pillars of the motives for the attacks on Ninova. His personal motives are not entirely clear to me. In my opinion, this comes from his desire to expand his support to the right than in the beginning, and this naturally creates tension between the president. and the party that was behind it. This is an old trial, but there is nothing surprising. for the BSP they went to “We continue the change”, said Valentin Vatsev.
He is adamant that this time the BSP has lost many votes because of it
Radev’s attack, because the Left Liberals from the BSP voted for this time
the left neoliberal formation “We continue the change”, which
will probably make the new liberal Bulgarian government. “Over
this project stood with its positions the Bulgarian president, so
there is no way Ninova will continue to conceal an obvious fact that
the president worked as a force against the BSP, “he said.
He is adamant that Radev committed treason.
“Left-wing liberals are trying to seize power and become a dominant force, and Radev is working hard to do so. It depends on Ninova’s will, her strategy and tactics, whether they will succeed,” the analyst predicted.
– .
