“Vasil Terziev considers planting 2,500 seedlings and collecting 200 garbage bags from “Faculty” and 400 bags from “Filipovtsi” to be an amazing success. A penny was donated from the city budget .
She confirmed that there are no new vehicles for urban transport, and that no other vehicles have been purchased.
“In the budget update, there is not a penny to improve working conditions. We had agreed that emergency funds would be allocated. Somehow it turned out that there was no money. How could it not be, because in the first 9 months they collected BGN 83 million more from local taxes and fees?!
The municipal councilor pointed out that there is unspent money in the amount of BGN 5 million for municipal hospitals.
“I met with almost all hospital directors. The director of Vtora Gradska said that there has not been an angiographer for a year. We will lose the license with which the city hospital works. The money is there, we just need Mr. Ivan Vasilev – The deputy mayor for finance and health care has not yet signed the reports because he wants to take the money for other projects. he entered without the deputy mayor,” said Grigorova.
“There is no way that the position of the chief architect is not important. It is possible to rebuild Sofia, but he will decide whether loopholes in the law should be used… It is important that there is transparency in competitions for such important positions,” said the host.
Grigorova noted that “Toplofikatsia” is traditionally in poor condition. She believes that the problem comes largely from national decisions.
“When I said that abandoning the contract with Gazprom was disastrous, the right-wing opposition sent me all kinds of epithets. losses are piling up,” he told the city councillor.
Add the rating:
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
2.2
Assessment 2.2 from 14 voice
2024-11-18 20:36:00
#Vanya #Grigorova #Vasil #Terziev #brags #saplings #Vtora #Gradska #lose #license #ᐉ #News #Fakti.bg #Bulgaria
How does the prioritization of urban planning roles, like that of the chief architect, influence the effectiveness of municipal projects and overall city development?
1. What are some of the key issues raised in the article regarding the allocation of funds for urban transport and improvements to working conditions in municipal hospitals?
2. How did Grigorova respond to allegations that the position of chief architect was less important in the municipality’s priorities?
3. Can you discuss the significance of the director of Vtora Gradska hospital’s statement about the need for an angiographer? Would losing their license have serious repercussions for the hospital or the community it serves?
4. What are some of the challenges facing the city council’s decision-making process when it comes to allocating funds for various projects, particularly those related to healthcare and infrastructure?
5. How do you think the national government’s decisions regarding energy contracts have impacted the city’s ability to maintain its heating infrastructure? Are there any potential solutions being considered at the local level to address these issues?
