US Southern Command sues China and Russia in Latin America – PublicoGT

SOURCE: MISSION TRUTH

The Pentagon’s promotion is not necessarily aimed at establishing constructive cooperation but is part of a project characterized by blackmail, opportunity and threats.

Recently, Laura Richardson, the commander of the Southern Command of the US Armed Forces, requested that a A new “Marshall Plan”.intended for Latin America, with the aim of countering the growing influence of Russia and China in the region.

During the Aspen Institute’s annual security forum, a platform that has become one of the most progressive and influential places in the post-World War II geopolitical landscape, he said: “I strongly believe that we need a Marshall Plan for the region.”

Their call is part of the ideological coordinates that the forum has had for decades.

Richardson’s call shows the great concern of the United States about the undoubted loss of geopolitical and economic influence in Latin America. Although he presented the proposal at the forum as an effort for “humanitarian aid” and economic reconstruction, it is actually an attempt to counter the presence of emerging powers in the multilateral world. in the department.

The general’s rhetoric about the “severe economic downturn” caused by the pandemic was used as a way to justify a program of economic and political intervention, similar to US expansionist efforts during the Cold War . As at the time with the Marshall Plan, presented as an apparently disinterested attempt to rebuild Europe after the war, the intention is to reshape the socio-economic structures of Latin America with the aim rebuild US hegemony.

The growing influence of China, through its Belt and Road Initiative, and the strengthening of trade relations with Russia, offers alternatives to the framework of partnership with Washington, the real reason behind this movement.

“And we don’t have those kinds of tools in our arsenal. How can we help? “I strongly believe that we need a Marshall Plan for the region or, in other words, an economic recovery law like the one in 1948, but in 2024, 2025,” senior security officials told him the audience at the Aspen Security Forum , legislators and key representatives of the defense and technology industry.

Richardson’s statement that “economic security and national security go hand in hand in this hemisphere” explains in itself why it is from that military domain that such statements are made, which would require come, at least, from the branches of the country. Department of State.

It is obvious that military security is an extension of economic security and strategic interests for the United States; Therefore, Latin America is considered a region to dominate.

The request to merge the economy with the military is supported by a statement that criminalizes the economic cooperation relations between Beijing and the Latin American states.

“And [la Franja y la Ruta] He wants to do good in the hemisphere, so I’m all for it. But it makes me a little skeptical when it comes to critical infrastructure […] deep sea ports, 5G, cybersecurity, energy, outer space.

The Southern Order, according to the latest instructions National security strategies Americans, pointing out his geopolitical rivals as agents of global challenges that require urgent attention.

In this framework, Latin America and the Caribbean are seen as strategic points whose defense is considered essential against networks of “transnational threats” that the United States uses as justification for the they did

In fact, at the forum, the Commander of the Southern Command accused China and Russia of benefiting from “transnational criminal organizations” that operate in various illegal activities on the continent: “From drug and human trafficking to mining, logging and illegal fishing in the south. fields.

Regarding Venezuela and its geopolitical allies, accusations related to these elements will be a recycling facility.

Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, senior media advisor at the Quincy Institute, questions the logic of this strategy that places the armed forces at the heart of American foreign policy.

“We should ask ourselves why the military is at the forefront in raising the real issues. Where are the diplomas? “Is this another argument for putting more eyes and military means on the area?” Vlahos asks.

The United States’ lack of attention to Latin America is another weakness that Richardson revealed. The lack of premium flights is creating a gap that China is exploiting, he argues.

According to her, regional leaders do not see American investment. In contrast, “there are only Chinese trees and Belt and Road Initiative projects.”

“So what I would ask of you all and those you know is that I need more visitors in the Western Hemisphere. I need more visitors to the Caribbean. I need more visitors in Central America. “I need more visitors in South America,” confirmed in the forum.

His initiative is not necessarily aimed at establishing constructive collaborations but is part of a project characterized by blackmail, opportunity and threats.

This policy eliminates offers of cooperation on the back burner, while strengthening the instrument of sanctions as a key tool for shaping the behavior of nations willing to align with US interests. .

In Latin America, this pressure is Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua, evidence of the coercive nature of US foreign policy.

CHINA AND LADY AMERICA : RELATIONSHIP ABOUT HEALTHY HEARING

In contrast to the American view of geopolitical competition, Beijing advocates global cooperation, reflected in the last congress of the Communist Party. It aims to strengthen economic openness by promoting a new paradigm of cooperation at the highest level, as well as greater integration into the global governance system.

His approach is based on international cooperation, multilateral order and inclusive economic globalization.

The novelty should also be mentioned the concept of Russian foreign policywhich was adopted on March 31, 2023, focusing on cooperation with non-Western states. The document particularly clarifies the intention to deepen mutually beneficial relations with Latin America and the Caribbean, including military cooperation, to help these countries deal with pressures from the United States.

This approach is presented as Russia’s response to the rise of Western coercive economic policy, and expresses the need to create “global commercial, monetary and financial systems” that will resist abuse of a “monopolistic or dominant position in certain areas of the economy.” “.

In Latin America, China’s economic and trade strategy focuses on access to raw materials and agricultural products, opening markets for goods and services, and cooperation in infrastructure and energy, with a particular focus on key resources such as lithium.

Beijing is trying to increase its presence in the region, like the United States, but at a long distance from doing so through mutually beneficial agreements. Such a view is described in the «Policy document on Latin America and the Caribbean«, published in 2016, as an update of the original 2008 document.

In practice, the trade relationship is characterized by a heavy emphasis on certain products and countries. According to the European Union Institute for Securities Studies70% of the Latin American region’s exports to Asian countries consist of five products – including oil – and 90% of this comes from Brazil, Chile, Peru and Venezuela.

This relationship has increased in 2023 by signing important agreements with other countries in the region, among which are trade issues with Ecuador and Brazil, and major agreements with Argentina and Nicaragua.

Regarding Venezuela, during the last visit of President Nicolás Maduro in China, 31 cooperation agreements were signed in different fields. The relationship between the two countries was upgraded to an All-Declared and All-Time Strategic Partnership.

In this context, Venezuela’s decision to create autonomous relations, in line with China’s proposal for non-interference and cooperative development, positions the South American country as basic element in Washington’s containment strategy against Beijing and other emerging powers that challenge the established unipolar order.

Such a crisis translates into increasing the military approach, stable in US foreign policy towards the region, but which is now seen more often and manifests itself in their interventions, pressure and coercion with the aim of controlling territory ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​necessary for their geopolitical interests.