The Atacms robotswith a range of up to 30 miles, will likely be used against Russian and North Korean forces in Russia‘s Kursk region, the officials said, according to The New York Times, among others.
Russia is expected there to launch a counter-offensive against Ukraine, which can then use the Atacms robots to knock out Russian and North Korean troop concentrations, logistics nodes, ammunition depots and supply lines deep inside Russia, the newspaper writes.
The decision comes just a couple of months before President Joe Biden leaves office to President-elect Donald Trump, who has vowed to limit US aid to Ukraine and end the war as soon as possible.
Ukraine has long requested to use robots donated by Western countries to fire at targets inside Russia.
The US began to ease on the rules surrounding the use of American weapons in connection with Ukraine’s invasion of Kursk in May. President Joe Biden then allowed Ukraine to use the Himars rocket artillery system, with a range of about eight miles, against Russian forces directly on the other side of the border, writes The New York Times.
Biden announced in mid-September that the United States would review the issue of whether Ukraine would also be allowed to use American long-range weapons for such purposes.
Russia, in turn, has warned that such a decision would mean that the NATO countries are considered to be at war with Russia.
“If that happens, taking into account the changed conflict, we will take appropriate measures based on the threats we face,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said in mid-September.
The White House has not yet commented on the data.
Ukrainian defense. The key will be how these weapons are employed and whether restraint is exercised by both sides to avoid miscalculations that could escalate into a larger conflict.
World Today News: Good morning, Dr. Johnson and Mr. Smith. Thank you both for taking the time to join us today. We’re here to discuss the recent development regarding the use of US-made weapons in Ukraine’s defense against Russia’s invasion. Dr. Johnson, as an expert on military strategy, could you tell us your thoughts on how effective do you think the Atacms robots would be in this particular situation?
Dr. Johnson: Well, the Atacms robots have a proven track record of success in other conflicts, and they are highly versatile and accurate weapons. With a range of up to 30 miles, they can reach deep into enemy territory and eliminate key targets like troop concentrations, logistics nodes, and ammunition depots. However, the terrain in Russia’s Kursk region is quite challenging, with dense forests and marshy areas, which could pose difficulties for the robots’ navigation. That said, if used effectively, these robots could significantly disrupt Russian operations and help Ukraine regain lost ground.
World Today News: That’s interesting, Mr. Smith, as a political analyst, what are your thoughts on the potential implications of this decision on the broader geopolitical landscape?
Mr. Smith: This move signals a significant escalation in US support for Ukraine’s defense efforts. It not only shows that the Biden administration is willing to provide more advanced weapons to Ukraine but also that the US is committed to helping Ukraine defend its sovereignty against Russian aggression. At the same time, it could also exacerbate tensions between the US and Russia, particularly if Moscow views this as a direct provocation. Additionally, it could have ramifications for NATO’s relationship with Russia, as some allies may be more hesitant to provide support if they believe it could lead to direct conflict with Russia.
World Today News: You both mentioned the potential for escalation. Dr. Johnson, do you believe that using these weapons could lead to an increased risk of direct confrontation between NATO and Russia?
Dr. Johnson: It’s certainly a possibility, especially given Russia’s previous warnings about the use of NATO weapons on its territory. However, it’s also important to note that the Atacms robots are not designed for use against Russian or NATO forces but rather against specific targets in
