A circular issued by the Ministry of Health announces the presence of a contaminated food potentially harmful to health.
An important communication comes from the Ministry of Health. The notification in question relates to a situation of food recall issued urgently and which concerns the presence of tuna subjected to an important problem.
Read also -> Mercury in fish | big risk for consumers | very high levels
The health of consumers is at risk, since some defrosted yellow fin quality tuna steaks have a chemical risk inside. The brand in question is that of Ittica Zu Pietro.
In the notification of the Ministry of Health, the wording of chemical risk is reported. This food item is marketed in vacuum packs with non-fixed weight. To recognize it, you can refer to the following indications.
- batch number 2008217/21;
- expiry date or minimum conservation term 07/06/2021;
Read also -> Restaurants | how to eat for lunch and dinner | the rules
Ministry of Health, information to customers on the contaminated product
The Ittica Zu Pietro Srl company produced this fish food in its plant in Bisceglie, an Apulian town located in the province of Barletta-Andria-Trani. The identification mark is as follows: IT 2830 CE. The precise reason for the recall is to be found in the presence of allergens.
Read also -> Expired food | what foods can we eat after expiration
All consumers who eventually have this product at home are required not to consume it. According to the indications of the Ministry of Health, the same must be returned to the supermarket or the reference grocery store where it was previously purchased.
Read also -> Masks | withdrawn those of a well-known brand | “They are harmful” PHOTO
To stay up to date on news, recipes and much more, keep following us on our profiles Facebook e Instagram. If you want to take a look at all of ours instead VIDEO RECIPES you can visit our channel Youtube.
By doing this, you will be entitled to a refund of the amount spent. In situations like this that refer to situations of potential risk to the health of buyers, the presence of the receipt is not essential.
–
