Mittal Blasts Big tech in India’s Got Latent Controversy
Table of Contents
Anupam Mittal,a judge on the popular Indian business reality show Shark Tank India,has waded into the controversy surrounding India’s Got Latent host Samay Raina and YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia,also known as BeerBiceps. Mittal’s Febuary 21, 2025, LinkedIn post condemned Allahbadia’s comments as “unacceptable,” but broadened the discussion to the larger issue of big tech’s role in escalating such controversies.
The controversy ignited after Allahbadia allegedly posed an inappropriate question to a contestant on India’s Got Latent, involving body parts and an indecent act in exchange for Rs 2 crore. The outrage intensified when he asked, “Would you watch your parents have sex every day for the rest of your life or join once to stop it forever?”
The video’s viral spread led to widespread condemnation and multiple FIRs against both Raina and Allahbadia.
Mittal, however, argued that the comedians are victims of a larger system. He wrote, “summon YouTube to the High Court too, why just Ranveer and Apoorva? see, what happened was messy, crass, and undeniably wrong. The statements & language used are totally unacceptable in any civilized society. But before we get all sanskari & load up our guns, lets understand what the real issue is,”
emphasizing the need to examine social media platforms’ roles.
He further elaborated on the show’s nature, stating, “India’s Got Latent wasn’t some Satyamev Jayate ka lost episode > it was always about insults, vulgarity, irreverence & shock. like it or hate it, that was the show 🤷🏻 So, when the host & guests cross the line, can we get scandalized? That’s literally the algorithmic jackpot from their perspective,”
suggesting the show’s format incentivized such behavior.
Mittal directly criticized social media platforms, asserting that they “dangle virality like prasad, watch creators chase, and then step back when the fire starts.”
He noted allahbadia’s apology, urging a shift in focus to the larger picture.He concluded by stating, “I personally think Ranveer, Apoorva, Samay et all are actually victims caught in an endless cycle of provocation for their relevance and survival…The real culprits are ‘Big-tech’ who take cover under digital intermediary laws that allow them to flout all responsibility & accountability. Imagine a newspaper or a tv channel publishing the type of content that these platforms carry with total impunity.”
Mittal’s comments highlight growing concerns about large tech companies’ content moderation obligations and algorithms’ potential to incentivize provocative and controversial behavior. The India’s Got Latent controversy serves as a case study in the complex interplay between content creators,platforms,and the legal ramifications of online speech.
The incident raises crucial questions about the ethical responsibilities of both content creators and the platforms that host their work.The pursuit of virality, frequently enough fueled by algorithms prioritizing engagement, can incentivize creators to push boundaries, potentially leading to controversies with significant consequences.
The Dynamics of Provocation in Digital Media
Shows like India’s Got Latent, designed around provocation and shock value, thrive in an surroundings where algorithms reward high engagement. This format inherently incentivizes riskier content, potentially leading to public backlash, legal ramifications, and reputational damage for all involved.
Balancing user freedom with regulatory compliance requires a multifaceted approach.Platforms need to establish and enforce strict content guidelines, invest in AI-powered content moderation, and be held accountable under regulatory frameworks. The trend towards treating digital platforms more like publishers than mere intermediaries underscores the growing expectation of responsibility.
The Ripple Effect of Content on Society
Controversial media content can considerably impact society. Past examples, such as the televised Nixon-Kennedy debates, demonstrate the power of media to shape public opinion. In the digital age,the rapid spread of misinformation and the influence on elections highlight the need for proactive content moderation.
moving Forward with Responsibility and Innovation
Creators must adhere to ethical standards, platforms must innovate in content moderation, and users must develop critical thinking skills to navigate the digital landscape responsibly. A collaborative effort is needed to foster a more ethical and accountable digital ecosystem.
In a world where digital content can become the spark for global controversies, the lines between humor, provocation, and societal norms are constantly being tested. What obligation should the platforms that host such content bear? Let’s dive deep into these questions with an expert who examines the intricacies of digital media controversies and the big tech industry’s role in them.
The Delicate Balance: Big Tech’s Role in the Virality and Ethical Lapses in Content
Editor: It seems that controversy is almost a hallmark of some digital content, especially shows like India’s Got Latent. What makes these platforms become hotbeds for provocative content in the first place?
Expert: The crux of the matter lies in how digital platforms are structured to prioritize engagement. When algorithms reward viral content, frequently enough defined by engagement metrics like shares and comments, creators are incentivized to push boundaries. This is evident in the case of India’s Got Latent, where the intention was to entertain by pushing the envelope perhaps too far, inviting significant backlash. This reward system fosters an environment where risky, even inflammatory content can thrive. The pursuit of virality becomes centered around content that breaks norms, and without proper moderation, these platforms become inadvertent breeding grounds for controversy.
Editor: Anupam Mittal suggested that the creators,like Ranveer Allahbadia and Samay Raina,might actually be victims of a larger system. Can you discuss this perspective?
Expert: Mittal brings up an essential point about systemic issues within digital media. Producers and influencers frequently enough operate in an ecosystem where provoking audiences can lead to considerable financial and reputational gains. This landscape pressures creators to continuously push boundaries, sometimes crossing ethical lines. They are caught between the need to stay relevant and the thin margins of acceptability.If one considers the systemic push for engagement-oriented content, it becomes apparent that creators are often incentivized, whether consciously or subconsciously, to partake in or even instigate controversies to maintain popularity. Platforms have a role in this dynamic by maintaining policies that either allow or curb such behavior and should be held accountable for the environments they create.
- Key system dynamics to consider:
– Algorithm incentives for virality: Chasing likes and shares.
– Creator pressures: Balancing content boundaries and popularity.
– platform roles: Moderating and setting ethical content guidelines.
Editor: As digital platforms evolve, what mechanisms can ensure they are held accountable for the content they host?
Expert: Accountability can be achieved by a multifaceted approach focusing on proactive measures rather then reactive ones. Platforms must invest in advanced AI for content moderation to catch harmful or inappropriate content before it spreads. Equally critically important is establishing stringent content guidelines and regularly updating them to reflect societal standards. Additionally, there needs to be a push toward regulatory oversight, treating digital media not just as intermediaries but as publishers who play a significant role in shaping public discourse. This shift in perception will help enforce content standards akin to conventional media outlets.
- Steps towards platform accountability:
1. Invest in AI moderation: Detecting problematic content.
2. Establish/Better regulate content guidelines: Reflecting evolving standards.
3. Regulatory oversight: Treat platforms like publishers.
4. Collaborate for innovation: Align technological progress with ethical standards.
Editor: Given the past impact of media on public opinion, how can we mitigate the risks of controversial content in the digital age?
Expert: The evolutionary journey of media—from the Nixon-Kennedy debates to today’s digital platforms—illustrates its profound impact on society. Mitigating risks begins with education: teaching both creators and audiences to critically evaluate content and understand its implications. Network guidelines must be paired with audience literacy efforts so people grasp the potential impact of the media they consume and produce. content creators must adhere to ethical standards to ensure they maintain trust and transparency with their audiences.
Editor: As we look to the future, what collaboration is necessary between creators, platforms, and users to foster a more ethical digital ecosystem?
Expert: Moving forward requires a collaborative and conscious effort:
- Creators should adhere to high ethical content standards, understanding their influence.
- Platforms should employ cutting-edge technology for moderation while holding themselves to regulatory standards.
- Users need to develop critical thinking skills for engaging with content responsibly and consciously.
in summary: The pathway toward a more ethical and sustainable digital media landscape is one that involves all stakeholders—creators, platforms, and users—in active dialog and shared responsibility. Through conscious efforts in regulation, moderation, and education, we can steer towards a future where digital content serves as a positive force rather than a controversial one.
We invite you to share your thoughts and join the discussion in the comments below or on social media. How do you see the future of digital media evolving, and what responsibilities should each stakeholder take on to ensure ethical content creation and dissemination?