untrue! “Dr. Anon” points out that “Section 112” does not sue for harassment as easily as wrongdoers claim. “Somchai” reiterates his position: 112 will not be given amnesty.

“Dr. Anon” explains that working on Case 112 involves many complicated steps. Investigators don’t want to do it because they’re tired. They point out that they can’t sue each other for harassment as easily as wrongdoers like to claim. “Somchai” reiterates his stance, opposing amnesty for 3 security cases, totaling 112.
Very interesting today (29 Nov. 2023) Asst. Prof. Dr. Anon Sakworawit Lecturer in the Faculty of Applied Statistics National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) posted a message via Facebook. Arnond Sakworawich stated that

“Section 112 is not easily used to bully each other. Anyone interested in accepting a Section 112 case to file a complaint must report it to The committee considers cases related to the security of the Kingdom first, and when the inquiry official has received permission from this committee. So you can start making expressions. Once the case is complete, it must be sent to the National Security Judicial Review Committee for consideration before it can be sent to the prosecutor for prosecution.

Simply put, the investigator I don’t really want to do a Section 112 case because it’s difficult to do and there’s a committee that carefully reads the documents in detail, breaking them down. It’s a very tiring and difficult job. And it is difficult to find expert witnesses or opinion witnesses. People don’t want to go to court as witnesses.

Let’s just say that it’s not easy to sue for bullying. As people who like to violate Section 112 like to claim.”

At the same time, Mr. Somchai Sawaengkarn, a member of the Senate Posted a message via Facebook, Somchai Sawaengkarn stated:

“Clearly confirm this. unchanged

Adhere to principles Support reconciliation and amnesty for political cases. Oppose amnesty for 3 important security cases

1. National corruption

2. Serious crimes

3. Offenses Section 112”