FACTS posts opinions with a wide range of viewpoints to encourage constructive debate.
Cutting the state – fifty by fifty. Whether it’s written like that, of course it’s 50:50. The probability is 50:50. How will we divide the country – north and south, or east and west? It’s 50:50 again. No one gives an answer to this question, and it is not written in the memorandum either, sorry for the memorandum. Otherwise, Borisov and Peevski decided to turn a slip of Kiril Petkov, who said a memorandum instead of a memorandum, into a big laugh. Both Peevski and Borisov were very impressed by the mistake. That and it is 50:50 – whether you will do it or not.
But let’s look at the country
The distribution of regulators, commissions, government posts. It is clear to all that for the most part these appointments are political. And there is no head of a regulator without a clear party or at least parliamentary backing. How effective regulators are in this form is another matter. But the topic of appointments there is more than interesting.
What has happened to the non-coalition so far?
The assembly, or as it is called only the government of our country, took power with requests for judicial reform, changes in the Constitution, changes in the services, changes in the regulators, etc. At the root of everything are the changes in the Constitution, which the PP-DB supposedly proclaimed as important, but in reality through them the PP-DB and GERB (note – at GERB this was certainly considered) made it so that DPS became an unavoidable factor . The selection of regulators takes place with the votes of 2/3 of the deputies. End. Finito. When you vote like that, did the PP-DB think? With 63 deputies, you try to govern, you vote for everything that GERB and DPS ask for, and in the end, why did it happen? How will there be an appointment of the head of the regulator without DPS… No way! How will the “dealing” of the state happen without DPS? No way!
Borisov defined the approach of the PP-DB as arrogant and unacceptable for the heads of the regulators to “share” 50:50. And how were they appointed at the time when he was prime minister… That there was no 50:50.
Peevski summed up: “We will not participate in cutting”. For cutting, you need tesla. And in whose hand turns out to be the Tesla. It is certainly not in that of Hristo Ivanov, but in DPS.
“Let’s stop talking about how GERB is with DSP. What’s wrong with DPS? Nine months that Hristo Ivanov drank greasy Turkish coffee in my office and sat on my lap until the Constitution happened and they all came to me hour after hour until we made the changes that are important for Bulgaria, now he will tell me in an interview that he will bring up the topic of DPS again. The topic is that DPS is the national responsible party and has supported this government for 9 months. If we weren’t there, it wouldn’t be there. The masks they must fall, Christo. I want you to know that, my friend,” Peevski told Ivanov.
From the boarding of Rosenets, to my friend… This is a political metamorphosis, which is subject to Tesla, with which the “good hand” will share the state to remember those wet moments (p.b. – it is about the boarding of Rosenets), who must have surfaced during the conversation, sitting on the lap of … and drinking greasy Turkish coffee.
What is the probability that all this is true – my, 50:50.
Place a rating:
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
4.7
Rating 4.7 from 19 votes.
2024-02-23 07:14:00
#Tesla #DPS #memorandum..
