A video with similar content has been spread by a number of state-owned media in Russia – as well as the official Twitter account of Russia’s UN delegation.
– Russia has already tried to prove that the attack on the maternity ward was “staged”, but independent fact-checkers quickly disproved the Russian allegations, Rybak says.
He refers, among other things, to a review from USA Today.
Both the Russian embassy in Britain and Russia’s UN ambassador Vassily Nebenzia have claimed that the woman in the picture is a paid actress, and that the whole incident was more or less staged.
In parallel, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov claims that the hospital was used by Ukrainian right-wing extremists and that there were no health personnel in the building when the incident took place.
– The interview with Marianna first appeared in Kremlin-supported Telegram channels, which are controlled by the FSB (Russia’s federal security service, journ.anm.). Only after that was it picked up by other media, he says.
–
Well-known propagandist
According to Rybak, the woman who interviews Vyshemirskaya in the clip is employed by the Kremlin-supported news agency EADaily.
– She is a well-known propagandist. EADaily has been spreading Russian propaganda for years.
Saturday writes English Sky News that Vyshemirskaya has apparently been evacuated to Russia, or to a separatist-controlled area of Donetsk in eastern Ukraine.
– We still do not know where Marianna is. It is very likely that she speaks under Russian coercion. Therefore, I would not put my trust in any of what she says in the interview until we know more.
He adds:
– Do not forget that Russia has a long tradition of obvious and blatant lies. Why should they stop now?
Rybak is not alone in suspecting that the interview is an active propaganda move from Russia.
Several experts have pointed out that the story Vyshemirskaya tells contradicts itself on several points.
One of them is the award-winning Bulgarian grave journalist Christo Grozev, who has a leading role in the journalist collective Bellingcat’s Russia investigations and has previously been central in their investigation into the poisoning of opposition leader Alexei Navalny.
He summarizes the content of the video like this, in a post on his Twitter-side:
– Kremlin: “We bombed a maternity ward because it was a recruitment center for Azov (Azov Battalion, editor’s note) But we did not bomb it, the Ukrainians did. Besides, there were no pregnant women there, only actresses. But here is the pregnant woman. She also played the other pregnant woman. The one who actually died ».
The same goes for human rights activist Thomas van Linge. He also goes so far as to suggest that the woman may be under pressure.
– The Kremlin’s propaganda is brutal, but very inconsistent. They make her move into all of the conspiracy theories around the hospital, so that the story as a whole becomes completely illogical, he writes.
The Ukrainian journalist and propaganda expert Olga Tokariuk writes on her Twitter-side that Vyshemirskaya apparently had good intentions – but that Russian media have edited it in a way that suits Russian propaganda narratives.
Tokariuk is affiliated with CEPA (The Center for European Policy Analysis).
– I am afraid that Russian propagandists will use and abuse Marianna, and manipulate and edit everything she says to suit their narrative, she writes.
In the wake of the reactions to the video clip, Vyshemirskaya has published the following short comment on his Telegram channel:
– I told about what I saw, what I heard and what eyewitnesses have told. You get to draw your own conclusions.