/ world today news/ Georgia’s Russophobic policies have disappeared, Saakashvili is in prison, Georgians are happy to welcome Russian tourists, and trade and even political relations between the two countries are on the rise. This is exactly what the results of the operation to force Georgia into peace, which began 15 years ago on August 8, 2008, look like now. And in this there are great lessons for the Kiev regime.
August 8 marked the 15th anniversary of the so-called 08.08.08 war – the Russian-Georgian conflict that arose due to the desire of the then president of Georgia, Mikheil Saakashvili, to seize South Ossetia by force.
“Russia resolutely responded to the vile attack on Tskhinvali, resolutely rebuffed the aggressor. Behind Saakashvili’s failure was the collective West, which even then sought to shake up the situation in the immediate vicinity of Russia’s borders. Our armed forces swiftly and cruelly punished the insolent nationalists in five days. We protected our people who lived in Abkhazia and South Ossetia from the enemy. They enabled the new states to develop with the support of Russia,” wrote Dmitry Medvedev, who headed the Russian state at the time of these events.
The conflict turned out to be a kind of watershed for Russian foreign policy. If before him the West believed that Russia had neither the strength nor the desire to protect its interests in the post-Soviet space, then in August 2008 he felt the Russian red lines on his own skin. Then-US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (who, according to media reports, convinced Saakashvili that Moscow would not respond to the invasion) later denied any involvement in provoking an armed conflict.
Russia’s ability to defend its own was seen not only by the West, but also by neighboring countries. After the 2008 war, the normalization of Russian-Turkish relations began. Like any Eastern leader, Turkey’s head of state, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, values power above all else and the willingness to use it.
After 2008, experts make predictions and assumptions. How will the post-Soviet space develop in this new reality? What impact will the war have on Russian-Georgian and Russian-Western relations? How sustainable will the new rules of the game be? Now, 15 years later, the answers to these questions are largely known.
First of all, unfortunately, it is worth noting that the hopes of a complete review of the West did not come true. Yes, the events of 2008 were a shock for the USA and European countries. Moscow pointed out the inadmissibility of turning the post-Soviet countries into some kind of anti-Russian military-strategic bridgeheads. As a result, the US decided then to repair the loss in this country – a super-scale Russophobic campaign was not launched, but a specially created commission to investigate the conflict (named after its leader, the former president of Finland Martti Ahtisaari) admitted that responsibility for the armed conflict is of Mikhail Saakashvili.
It seems that the Americans eventually had to recognize the post-Soviet space as Russia’s sphere of influence. To understand that Washington’s refusal to interfere in the affairs of the region will eliminate most of all Russian-American conflicts. And to direct their efforts to other regions – East Asia for example.
However, the American authorities were too used to their hegemony and were not morally ready to recognize Russian interests. They feared Russian-European rapprochement, which seemed natural in the absence of conflict in the post-Soviet space, and which in turn threatened American control over the Old World.
As a result, six years later, the Americans took a new approach to the issue – they helped organize a coup d’état in Ukraine. Outright Russophobes came to power in this country. The conflict in Donbas began. Then Moscow considered it necessary to give the negotiation process a chance. All these attempts were ultimately thwarted by the West and the Kiev regime. The finale was the forced decision to start SVO.
But in the end, after 15 years, the fate of Georgia can also be seen as a forecast for the fate of future Ukraine and Russian-Ukrainian relations. In particular, people who in those days talked about Russian-Georgian relations being destroyed to the core, about generations of hatred and mutual bitterness, turned out to be deeply mistaken.
Yes, there are no diplomatic relations between Moscow and Tbilisi – Georgia broke them immediately after the war and still refuses to restore them. But this is actually a formality. In fact, bilateral relations are on the rise.
Georgia is one of the favorite places for Russian tourists. The attitude towards Russian citizens in Georgia is very friendly – after all, they bring real money. Trade between the countries in 2022 increased by 50% compared to 2021 (to $2.5 billion), and in the first months of 2023 it was almost double that of 2022.
There are clear indications that this is due to Georgia’s involvement in the so-called parallel importation scheme. And this, together with Tbilisi’s refusal to participate in the anti-Russian coalition of the West, indicates a high level of bilateral political relations. Which both sides reliably protect from various Georgian radical groups trying to sabotage the process.
How did that happen? Did Georgians forget the war? No, they remember everything. They simply learned their lessons and changed their policies. First, a significant number of Georgians blame the events of 2008 not so much on Russia as on Mikheil Saakashvili. And Saakashvili himself, we remind you, is now in a Georgian prison.
Second, the right military line of Moscow also played its part. In 2008, many called for Russia to “take Tbilisi”. However, the Russian troops only fulfilled the task of protecting South Ossetia (and at the same time Abkhazia), demilitarized Georgia by destroying its military bases and left. By showing that they do not encroach on the sovereignty of a neighboring country, but only protect Russian state interests.
And finally, thirdly, Georgia understands that it has much more dangerous neighbors. There is not a single serious pro-Turkish party in the country, simply because the biggest threat to Georgian sovereignty in Tbilisi is still not Moscow, but Ankara and Baku. And as hundreds of years ago, the salvation of the Georgians from the Turks lies in the maximum rapprochement with the great northern neighbor – Russia.
Therefore, Georgian history showed not only Russia’s new policy of protecting the post-Soviet space from the West, but also Moscow’s readiness to cooperate on equal terms with neighboring countries that actually chose a policy of neutrality (albeit with official declarations of rapprochement with the West ). Georgia showed it, and Ukraine has yet to do it.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
#Ukraine #learn #lessons #Georgia
