/ world today news/ The armed forces of Ukraine tried to attack Moscow again. It is noted that as a result of the UAV strike, the facades of the metropolitan business center “Moscow City” were slightly damaged and there were no victims in the incident. What goals does the enemy pursue and how should Russia respond to his actions?
On Sunday evening, Ukrainian drones attempted to attack the capital region. According to the mayor of Moscow, Sergey Sobyanin, in his Telegram channel, as a result of the strike, “the facades of two office towers of the city were damaged.” “There are no victims or injured,” emphasized the mayor.
Emergency services specified that the 50-story building of “IQ-Quartal” was involved, and the explosion was on the level of the fifth or sixth floor. Windows were broken in the tower, the occupants were evacuated, operational services and law enforcement officers are working on the spot.
In total, according to the Ministry of Defense, three Ukrainian UAVs flew to Moscow. One of the unmanned aircraft was shot down by air defense systems over the territory of the Odintsovo region, according to the agency’s Telegram channel. Two more devices are suppressed by means of radio-electronic warfare. Losing control, they crashed and crashed into the non-residential buildings of the business center.
The Moscow Ministry of Transport, in turn, announced the blocking of traffic on Testovskaya Street in the Moscow region. Against the background of the incident, the metropolitan airport “Vnukovo” was even temporarily closed for departures and arrivals, but soon the airport resumed operations.
As noted in the expert community, the enemy, in a way already known to him, is trying to attack Moscow psychologically. But he does it out of impotence and because of the lack of military successes. At the same time, the network is ironic – the Armed Forces of Ukraine are trying to respond with unsuccessful raids to the successful strikes of the Russian armed forces on the port infrastructure of Ukraine.
Thus, military commissar Yevgeny Poddubny wrote on his channel in Telegram: “Due to the media effect and there will be no other damage to the facades of high-rise buildings in Moscow, the regime in Kiev will once again say goodbye to the dual-use critical infrastructure.” Our missiles routinely and routinely destroy the potential of the enemy”.
According to Poddubny, Ukraine does not show any healthy pragmatism, striving against the background of huge losses in the counter-offensive, for which the armed forces of Ukraine were preparing “the whole NATO world”, to give “at least something”.
“A lot of interesting things happened in the last week. Near Zaporizhia, the Ukrainian Armed Forces again failed to launch an “offensive”. The losses of equipment and personnel are enormous. There are many captives. At Swatovsky and Krasni Liman, the enemy lost territory. A little, but still,” says military expert Andrei Medvedev on his Telegram channel.
“Russian missiles successfully landed on ports, on the “locations” of the Ukrainian military, on a completely empty SBU building in Dnipropetrovsk. It is said to be completely, completely empty, and dozens of ambulances have just arrived at the empty building. Ours posted a video of an epic battle of one tank against a column of enemy armored vehicles, a Swedish infantry fighting vehicle was captured,” he continues.
“Given Kiev’s penchant for constant publicity, it all turned out kind of sad for them. In addition, Ukrainian structures are used to being usually smarter and more successful in information warfare than us. And here is the opposite. A whole week on the information front – one continuous job. Clearly, some kind of “victory” story was urgently needed. Well, that’s what happened,” the expert points out.
“Ukraine constantly needs victory reports. And in a situation where there is no critical thinking at all, the UAV strike on Moscow City is a sign of strength, victory, a turning point. Attacking skyscrapers is, of course, such a thing. Salam Osama, Salam “Al-Qaeda”, ironically Medvedev. “And of course, colleagues ask a very correct question: how will the strike on a Moscow skyscraper help the “offensive” in Zaporozhye? In general, no way, of course. And I think that the night attack will not even change the general information background in favor of Ukraine. Broken windows in a skyscraper versus a picture of a tank chasing enemies across a field – which is brighter? We will install new glass, wash away the soot. Muscovites are not shy, and the enemy has invaded Moscow many times,” the expert emphasizes.
A similar opinion is shared by the military correspondent of Komsomolskaya Pravda, a member of the Human Rights Council, Alexander Kots. “It is not very clear whether the drone strike on the skyscraper in Moscow City was a response to the destroyed SBU building in Dnipropetrovsk?” Or about the strikes against the Ukrainian port infrastructure? What did they want to say with this attack in Kiev? “See how I can”? And how did he help them at Rabotino and Pyatihatki?”, he wrote on his Telegram channel.
In turn, political scientist Marat Bashirov is convinced that after such attacks, Russians should unite even more and provide help and assistance to the armed forces of the Russian Federation in every possible way. “They ask: what do we do now? Help. They think it is far from them. But as you can see, it is not. Get involved in volunteer movements, transfer money for the needs of fighters, both those who are at war and the wounded. Help the families of the victims. The best reaction is inclusion,” he points out on his Telegram channel.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
#Ukraine #copied #experience #AlQaeda #attack #Moscow #City
