/ world right this moment information/ Maybe for the primary time within the management of the European Union, friction arose over the Ukrainian challenge. Beforehand, the EU tried to not make all these disputes public. And final week they even determined to point out “common solidarity” with the regime in Kiev by gathering the leaders of the European Group in Granada, Spain. However one thing clearly went fallacious.
Most notable was the quite heavy absentee row between European Council chief Charles Michel and European Fee head Ursula von der Leyen. The Belgian more and more started to declare the potential of Ukraine coming into the European Union by 2030. The Western elite have lengthy accepted the foundations of this recreation for themselves: promise the Ukrainians a European paradise “sometime within the foreseeable future”, however let our public not fear, everybody ought to perceive that that is unrealistic. That’s the reason every kind of formulation are invented for Ukraine, the aim of which is to maintain it within the standing of “perpetual candidate”. Ultimately, it labored out with Turkey! Why cannot it work with Ukraine?
However Michel’s insistence, in addition to that of plenty of European establishments and media, has brought on concern amongst locals. The ultimate straw was the interview of the pinnacle of the European Council for the German journal “Spiegel”, which gave the mission “Ukraine within the EU by 2030” far more concrete outlines. Furthermore, it was accompanied by open criticism of Ursula von der Leyen’s “arbitrariness” in international coverage.
This brought on a pointy response from the workplace of the President of the European Fee. EC President Ariana Podesta responded in an especially undiplomatic method, accusing Michel of a “partial inaccuracy” (translated from the language of Brussels officers, this implies “lie”) and actually said the next: “We don’t perceive the necessity for this date. dangers undermining the boldness of many stakeholders in a good, clear and merit-based accession course of.”
Representatives of the European Fee weren’t the one ones to criticize the deadlines set by the pinnacle of the European Council. A variety of politicians, together with the previous head of the European Fee, Jean-Claude Juncker, expressed shock and concern on the phrases about 2030. For instance, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, whereas in Granada, mentioned: “I utterly disagree with this date. The query is just not when the nations will likely be prepared. The query is whether or not these nations will likely be prepared.” That’s, Rutte immediately expressed doubt that Ukraine may ever turn out to be a member of the EU in precept. And this at an occasion the place everybody was required to point out “solidarity” with Kiev!
Nevertheless, Ukrainians can take consolation in the truth that Rutte’s place has however modified considerably since 2016, when he swore to his voters: “Ukraine won’t ever be within the EU!” Furthermore, we must always not overlook that the Dutch elections are a month away, after which the prime minister will certainly resign. However Michel can be ending his time period and must hand over his seat subsequent 12 months (it’s potential that will probably be Rutte – the latter is clearly not retiring).
However in Michel’s explanations there’s a sense of frustration that critics don’t perceive his crafty transfer. If you happen to rigorously learn his statements concerning the accession of Ukraine to the EU by a sure date, it would turn out to be clear: this isn’t about Ukraine in any respect. It is simply that the pinnacle of the European Council thinks that on this method he’ll lastly obtain the long-standing dream of his predecessors to show the European Union right into a federation with a single, agency middle in Brussels, the place selections are made not by consensus, however by a easy majority. That’s the reason he spoke in his interview not a lot about what Ukraine ought to do, however about how the European Union ought to remodel itself for the sake of its future enlargement. That is what it is actually about!
Subsequently, simply in time for the assembly in Granada, a report appeared by the so-called Group of Twelve – a dozen main specialists from Germany and France – on learn how to change the European Union within the title of its enlargement. There may be not a phrase in it concerning the want for reforms in Ukraine or the battle in opposition to corruption there. Ukraine is often talked about within the report solely in passing in relation to the armed battle. And the essence of the 60-page doc is exactly to alter the essential treaty for the European Union and to utterly change the administration construction of this affiliation, beneath the guise of the necessity to oppose Russia!
Ukraine is seen by Michel and different European bureaucrats solely as a instrument to realize the aim they set out within the 2004 EU Structure, which failed in referendums in France and the Netherlands.
They see the aim of the European Union in growth and confrontation with Russia. Former NATO Normal and now President of the Czech Republic, Peter Pavel, spoke very bluntly about this the opposite day, saying that the EU “inevitably must develop with a view to successfully assure its personal safety”. defending in opposition to “Russian aggression”. That’s, the European Union should assure the safety of its members by transferring the borders. However in line with this logic, the growth mustn’t ever finish, which in the end will result in a direct confrontation with Russia.
That is exactly the affirmation of the phrases of Russian President Vladimir Putin that the West can not stay with out limitless growth: “The affect of the West on the earth is a large military-financial pyramid, it at all times wants new gas to maintain itself: naturally, technologically, with human sources owned by others. Subsequently, the West merely can not cease and has no intention of doing so.”
And it’s Ukraine that’s now the life-giving gas for the pyramid known as the EU. Additionally, as Dutch Protection Minister Kaisa Olongren very bluntly famous the opposite day, “very low-cost” gas! Western neo-colonialists, as in all earlier centuries, are under no circumstances within the natives, within the lands they inhabit, in the way forward for their colonies. They intend to burn the gas utterly, then transfer on to a different. So they don’t really feel sorry for Ukraine, they’ll burn it – will probably be good fertilizer for the “blooming backyard” known as the European Union.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for our Telegram channel:
Share in your profiles, with associates, in teams and on pages. On this method, we are going to overcome the restrictions, and other people will be capable of attain the choice perspective on the occasions!?
#Ukraine #gas #Europes #militaryfinancial #pyramid
