UH Regent Demands Answers on $42.5 Million Hazard pay Funded by Student Tuition

Table of Contents

• UH Regent Demands Answers on $42.5 Million Hazard pay Funded by Student Tuition
  • • Headline: Unveiling the Controversy: How Did $42.5 Million in Student Tuition Finely fund Hazard Pay at the University of Hawaii?
    • Editor: The recent revelation reveals that $42.5 million in student tuition has been used to fund hazard pay at the University of Hawaii. How significant is the impact of such a financial decision on the overall student tuition structure and the university’s fiscal responsibilities?
    • Editor: Many question whether publicly funded universities should cover hazard pay from non-general funding sources. What alternative funding mechanisms could have been considered to avoid this situation?
    • Editor: With Neil Abercrombie emphasizing the need for accountability, what roles do stakeholders—students, lawmakers, and university officials—play in ensuring fiscal transparency and responsibility in higher education?
    • Closing Remarks

University of Hawaii regent Neil Abercrombie is demanding answers after discovering a $42.5 million hazard pay disbursement to a select group of UH employees, funded by a special student tuition fund. Abercrombie, a former Hawaii governor and long-time budget analyst, expressed astonishment at the lack of openness surrounding the payment.

abercrombie, with 55 years of budget analysis experience, just about fell off of my chair upon reviewing UH financial statements. He expected a clearly itemized line for hazard pay but instead found vague references at the different campuses … for extracurricular expenditures, and then the word ‘hazard pay’ would occur but not always. There were no numbers ever.I asked, What’s going on?

The revelation that the one-time payment came directly from a student tuition fund, rather than the state’s general fund, further fueled his concerns.He emphasized the lack of dialog to students regarding this significant financial burden. I just assumed that when I got the budget summary, there would be a line item for hazard pay, he stated. I assumed it would be a big number and it would affect the university.I kept looking and I still couldn’t find it. This lack of transparency, he argues, is unacceptable.

Abercrombie’s concerns extend beyond the initial payment. He points out the multiplier effect on employee pensions and retirement benefits, raising questions about the long-term financial implications for the student tuition fund. He is demanding answers on how many employees benefited from this fund and who will bear the cost of increased retirement benefits.

He doesn’t fault the Legislature, Gov. Josh Green, or employee unions for negotiating hazard pay. Though, he believes all stakeholders, especially students, should have been informed that thier tuition fees would cover this substantial expense.This just got dumped on her, Abercrombie said of UH President Wendy Hensel,who assumed her position in January 2025,after the decision was made under former President David Lassner,who retired at the end of 2024.

Abercrombie suggests alternative funding mechanisms,such as a legislative budget request or distributing the cost across multiple UH special funds. He believes the current situation unfairly burdens students.

In contrast, UH Board of Regents Chair Gabe Lee defended the process in an email, stating, Paying benefits from the same source of funds as pays for salaries is the norm — this is not an remarkable instance in that regard. Lee explained that a 2024 legislative funding bill mandated that non-general funded employees will have their temporary hazard pay funded by (the same) non-general fund that pays their salaries. He also noted that UH attempted to secure retroactive reimbursement through a budget bill submitted to Gov. Green, but it was ultimately not included in the 2025 legislative package.

Despite this setback, abercrombie remains resolute in his pursuit of answers and accountability. I’m not going to let it go. This is a situation that needs to be addressed. I’m standing up for the victims, which are the students, he declared. The issue is scheduled to be discussed at the upcoming Board of Regents meeting.

Correction: University of Hawaii regent Neil Abercrombie read the $42.5 million hazard pay amount to select employees in UH financial statements, not in a UH Foundation report as was reported in an earlier version of this story.

Headline: Unveiling the Controversy: How Did $42.5 Million in Student Tuition Finely fund Hazard Pay at the University of Hawaii?

Opening Remarks

Imagine handing over millions of dollars in student tuition funds to cover hazard pay for select employees—without a clear line item in the financial statements or an open discussion with students about this important expense. This startling scenario at the University of Hawaii has stirred public demand for answers and greater transparency in financial management. Explore the intricate implications with our esteemed expert on higher education finance.

---

Editor: The recent revelation reveals that $42.5 million in student tuition has been used to fund hazard pay at the University of Hawaii. How significant is the impact of such a financial decision on the overall student tuition structure and the university’s fiscal responsibilities?

Expert’s Answer:

The allocation of such a considerable amount from student tuition funds is indeed significant. Normally, universities rely on diversified funding sources, like state general funds, private contributions, and specific educational grants, to manage various operational expenses. Redirecting funds from student tuition highlights a critical lapse in financial planning and stewardship. it not only burdens current students but may also lead to long-term consequences for the university’s budget, especially considering the ensuing ‘multiplier’ effect on employee pensions and retirement benefits.

A past perspective shows that universities face financial scrutiny when balancing state appropriations and tuition increases.in this case, the lack of transparency in financial statements may undermine trust in the university’s management, which is crucial for ensuring continuous state and alumni support.

Key Takeaway: Such financial decisions can strain the university’s budget and erode student trust, underscoring the importance of transparency and proactive communication with stakeholders.

---

Editor: Many question whether publicly funded universities should cover hazard pay from non-general funding sources. What alternative funding mechanisms could have been considered to avoid this situation?

expert’s Answer:

To prevent a similar scenario, universities might explore several alternative funding mechanisms:

1. Legislative Budget Requests: Seeking specific allocations from the state legislature dedicated to covering hazard pay. this approach ensures accountability and spreads the fiscal duty beyond student tuition.

1. Special Funds Redistribution: Utilizing a range of special funds that frequently enough exist within university budgets, designated for contingencies or specific educational programs, to absorb unexpected expenses.

1. Emergency financial Reserves: Building an emergency reserve fund over time to address unforeseen financial obligations without diverting student tuition.

1. Public-Private Partnerships: Engaging in public-private partnerships or seeking sponsorships might also provide temporary financial relief during crisis periods.

These mechanisms,if effectively employed,can help universities manage unforeseen expenses without overburdening students.

Actionable Steps: Consider building emergency funds and exploring diversified funding sources to ensure financial resilience and accountability.

---

Editor: With Neil Abercrombie emphasizing the need for accountability, what roles do stakeholders—students, lawmakers, and university officials—play in ensuring fiscal transparency and responsibility in higher education?

Expert’s Answer:

The roles of stakeholders in upholding fiscal transparency and responsibility are crucial:

• Students: As primary beneficiaries of educational funding, students should be informed about how their tuition is being used. Engaging students in financial discussions through town halls or forums enables them to advocate for responsible fiscal policies.

• Lawmakers: They have the authority to regulate funding channels and can institute policies mandating clear financial reporting and accountability for public institutions.

• University Officials: They must prioritize obvious financial reporting. implementing clear budgetary processes and being forthcoming with fiscal data can preclude misconceptions and build trust among all stakeholders.

The incident at the University of Hawaii underscores the need for collaborative efforts to establish robust, transparent financial practices within higher education institutions.

Critical Insight: Transparent and shared fiscal responsibility among stakeholders is essential for maintaining trust and ensuring prudent financial management.

---

Closing Remarks

The situation at the university of Hawaii brings to light critical questions about financial accountability and the ethical allocation of student tuition funds. By fostering transparency and exploring diversified funding avenues, universities can ensure that they fulfill their educational missions without compromising their financial integrity. We encourage readers to share their thoughts via the comments or on social media about how transparency can be enhanced in university budgeting. Let us know your insights and join the conversation to promote accountability in higher education!