The head of Olimpia Savintsy, Dmitry Galitsky, mentioned the suspension of UAF representative Valery Lyuty for 6 months for a bribe of 2,500 hryvnias.
– What can you tell us about the fact that UAF representative Valery Lyuty received a bribe of 2,500 hryvnias from your club?
– See what the situation is. I also received a call from the UAF, and gave evidence on this point. There was such a program, he received 2500 UAH – this was his daily allowance for food. Well, who even writes about a bribe of 2,500 hryvnia?
Before the game, Lyuty arrived, as well as the game inspector. We are an unprofessional team, he pointed out our shortcomings, but the game went on as planned. As I understand it, it was possible to hold the game with these defects, because First League games are also held at this stadium.
Based on this, it is possible not to allow games to be held at this stadium and the Poltava Sports Complex, or what? The certificate was given to this stadium, right?
As a result, Lyuty said that there was something wrong here, there were some defects, and I replied: “This is an amateur team, we will fix everything and everything will be well.” His answer: “Yes, Dmitry, okay, let’s start the game. ” There was nothing else, he didn’t mention anything.
After the match, I came to him and said that we do not give food, but we have a daily allowance for food, I gave 2,500 hryvnia, the UAF knows about this and everything is written about.
He arrived in the morning and left in the evening, you understand that he needs to eat 2-3 times. It’s really funny that we took a bribe of 2,500 hryvnia. I still understand if they wrote that it was 250 thousand hryvnia, but this is all nonsense.
I read about this too, my wife let me know this news. You understand that a bribe of this size doesn’t even qualify as an administrative violation, if I’m not mistaken. Who even said that? Why is our football frustrated for 2500 hryvnia?
Subscribe to Dynamo.kiev.ua on Telegram: @dynamo_kiev_ua! Only the hottest news
2024-11-26 11:56:00
#received #UAH #daily #allowance #food #November #Dynamo #Kyiv #Shurik
From a legal standpoint, what are the potential ramifications for both Mr. Galitsky and the UAF as a result of this investigation, and how might the outcome of this case impact future legal precedents in Ukrainian sports?
## World Today News Presents: Football, Finances, and Fairness
**Introduction:**
Welcome to World Today News. Today, we’re diving into a controversial topic in Ukrainian football. The head of Olimpia Savintsy, Dmitry Galitsky, has been accused of bribing a UAF representative, Valery Lyuty. Mr. Galitsky maintains it was a simple expense allowance, not a bribe.
To shed light on this complex situation, we have two esteemed guests today:
* **Viktor Chornovol:** A renowned sports journalist with extensive experience covering Ukrainian football.
* **Olena Stavniychuk:** A legal expert specializing in sports law and ethical conduct.
Join us as we explore the different facets of this story, discussing the implications for Ukrainian football, the legal ramifications, and the broader issue of transparency and fairness in the sport.
**Section 1: Understanding the Accusation**
**Host:** Mr. Galitsky, the accusations against you are serious. Could you elaborate on the events that led to the suspension of Mr. Lyuty?
**Dmitry Galitsky:** (Provides detailed account of the interaction with Mr. Lyuty, emphasizing the context of the “allowance” and denying any intention to bribe)
**Host:** Mr. Chornovol, what are your initial thoughts on this situation? Does this incident reflect a larger problem within Ukrainian football?
**Viktor Chornovol:**
(Provides expert analysis, drawing on experience and knowledge of past incidents, discussing potential systemic issues and the impact on public perception of the sport)
**Section 2: Breaking Down the Legal Implications**
**Host:** Ms. Stavniychuk, from a legal standpoint, what constitutes a bribe? Does Mr. Galitsky’s account potentially fall within that definition?
**Olena Stavniychuk:** (Explains the legal definition of a bribe, analyzes the specific details of the case, discusses potential legal consequences for both parties, highlights the role of the UAF in the investigation)
**Host:** Mr. Galitsky, how do you respond to the legal concerns raised by Ms. Stavniychuk?
**Dmitry Galitsky:** (Responds to the legal arguments, reiterating his stance, potentially introducing evidence to support his case)
**Section 3: The Broader Impact on Ukrainian Football**
**Host:** Mr. Chornovol, how do you think this case will affect the perception of Ukrainian football both domestically and internationally?
**Viktor Chornovol:** (Discusses the potential damage to the image of Ukrainian football, addresses possible consequences for sponsors and fans, explores the need for greater transparency and accountability within the governing bodies)
**Host:** Ms. Stavniychuk, what steps can be taken to strengthen ethical standards and prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future?
**Olena Stavniychuk:** (Offers recommendations for improving regulations, promoting a culture of ethical conduct, proposes solutions for fostering greater transparency within the UAF)
**Conclusion:**
This case raises crucial questions about the integrity of Ukrainian football. While Mr. Galitsky vehemently denies any wrongdoing, the incident highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability within the UAF. We hope this discussion has shed light on this complex issue and spurred a much-needed dialogue about the future of Ukrainian football. We thank our guests for their valuable insights.
