U.S. media: U.S. railway safety supervision continues to be absent
The scene of the derailment accident of a train carrying toxic chemicals in Ohio, USA (data map)
Overseas Network, February 25th On February 21st, the US environmental magazine Grist issued an article saying that in the absence of safety supervision in the railway industry, the derailment accident of a train carrying toxic chemicals in Ohio in early February was a ” Sooner or later a catastrophe is bound to happen”.
According to reports, although the U.S. rail system has undertaken most of the transportation of hazardous chemicals or explosives, for many years, the industry has suffered from poor working conditions, lack of strict safety standards and transparency, and train safety accidents are common.
According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, more than 250 trains have derailed across the U.S. in the past decade. Nearly half of these incidents involved hazardous waste.
According to the analysis of the report, the frequent occurrence of train safety accidents is, on the one hand, due to the continuous layoffs of Amtrak in order to reduce costs, resulting in a shortage of manpower and increased traffic safety hazards. Calls by railway workers for increased safety measures were ignored. On the other hand, the pressure exerted by the railway lobby group also obstructed the passage of the regulations on the supervision and management of the transportation of dangerous goods by train. (Liu Qiang from Overseas Network)
Copyright and Disclaimer
Copyright statement: All manuscripts whose source is “Jiangsudian, Xinhua Daily and its sub-newspapers” or “Xinhua Newspaper Network” are the exclusive copyright of Xinhua Newspaper Network, and shall not be reproduced or mirrored without permission; authorized reproduction The source must be indicated as “Xinhua Newspaper Network”, and the cable header of “Xinhua Newspaper Network” must be reserved.
Disclaimer: Manuscripts reprinted on this site only represent the author’s personal views and have nothing to do with Xinhua News Agency. Its originality and the text and content stated in the article have not been confirmed by this site, and this site does not make any guarantee or commitment to the authenticity, completeness, and timeliness of this article and all or part of the content, text, and text. Readers are only for reference, and please Verify the relevant content yourself.