U.S. Lawmakers Urged to Join China’s Electric Vehicle Revolution, Professor Warns Against Short-Sighted Strategies

China’s electric vehicles are booming, but they face heavy restrictions when entering the U.S. market. Some U.S. lawmakers even tried to push for a bill to impose tariffs on Chinese cars. However, an American university professor called out the Biden administration, saying that these strategies are short-sighted and ineffective. , pointed out that the United States cannot defeat China, and it is wise to join China’s electric vehicle revolution.

Christopher S. Tang, a professor at the Anderson School of Management at the University of California, Los Angeles, wrote an article in the South China Morning Post titled “US can’t beat China, so it should join it in the EV revolution”, pointing out that the two parties in the United States are restricting Chinese electric vehicles. There is consensus on access to the U.S. market, and some lawmakers are even trying to push a bill to impose tariffs on Chinese cars, but these strategies may prove ineffective. Restrictive measures will not only hinder the popularization of electric vehicles in the United States, harm the development of the green economy, and be detrimental to the innovation of American car companies, but may also lead to countermeasures by China for violating trade rules.

The article also pointed out that although the two parties in the United States have differences on many key national issues, they share a consistent stance on reducing dependence on China. The latest measures taken by the two parties include raising tariffs or preventing Chinese electric vehicles from entering the U.S. market on the grounds of “national security.” . While doing so may protect U.S. jobs in the short term, it could hinder EV adoption in the long term and limit U.S. consumers’ access to affordable EVs in the medium term. The Biden administration should not restrict Chinese EVs, but You should focus on developing a long-term strategy.

In late February this year, U.S. President Biden directed the Department of Commerce to launch an investigation into Chinese electric vehicles on the grounds of “potential national security threats.” Republican Senator Josh Hawley also took the opportunity to propose increasing the base tariff to 100%, which means that the tariff on cars imported from China will be increased to 125%.

Hawley’s proposal and Biden’s directive reflect concerns about the impact of Chinese automakers on the U.S. auto market and a desire to protect U.S. auto workers. However, these strategies may prove ineffective.

Deng’s article points out three points:

First, imposing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles could violate World Trade Organization rules and invite retaliation from China. This may intensify trade friction between the two countries, which will be detrimental to both countries.

Second, using tariffs to prevent U.S. automakers from importing Chinese electric vehicle batteries and auto parts could raise production costs, thereby reducing the competitiveness of U.S. electric vehicles. In the medium term, U.S. automakers cannot decouple from China because they rely heavily on Chinese auto parts.

Third, protecting the U.S. auto industry may undermine U.S. auto companies’ motivation to innovate and produce high-quality, affordable products.

The article also pointed out that after years of high inflation, American consumers have become hesitant to spend, resulting in sales of large electric vehicles in the United States falling short of expectations. If cheap Chinese products are prevented from entering the U.S. market at this time, American consumers will not be able to choose affordable electric vehicles. The Biden administration’s policies not only hinder the spread of electric vehicles but also harm the development of a sustainable green economy. Instead of banning Chinese electric vehicles from entering the U.S. market, the United States should consider welcoming them to transform its own electric vehicle ecosystem.

Allowing the sale of certain affordable and reliable Chinese electric vehicles could be an effective strategy to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles in the United States. The article writes that politics aside, most Americans like calculated transactions. In the past decade, the quality of Chinese cars has improved significantly. BYD’s electric cars are very affordable and received a five-star safety rating from the European New Car Assessment in 2022.

In addition, challenges from China will force companies such as General Motors and Ford to innovate, otherwise these established American car companies will perish. The article also suggested that the Biden administration could invite BYD to build a factory in the United States to produce models such as the Atto 3 instead of blocking its entry. Moreover, BYD has been producing electric buses in Lancaster, California since 2013.

The author also calls on U.S. auto companies and Chinese auto companies to establish partnerships and learn from each other to promote innovation in the United States. “While it’s true that the Chinese have learned a lot from the Americans, it’s equally possible that the Americans can learn from the Chinese, especially when it comes to developing an electric vehicle ecosystem.”

The article pointed out that only a few Chinese electric vehicle companies can survive in the fiercely competitive Chinese market. The United States should learn its lesson and encourage more companies to enter the market. Letting the market decide the outcome is in line with the American spirit. “If you can’t beat them, join them. The United States can cooperate with China in areas of mutual interest, such as setting global standards, sharing best practices, and addressing environmental challenges related to electric vehicles. By doing so, the United States can Enhance its competitiveness and innovation in the global electric vehicle market while reducing dependence on fossil fuels and greenhouse gas emissions.”

deepthroat

**Blog articles are written at your own responsibility and do not represent the position of our company**

The German military has recently been exposed to a recording involving “considering assisting Ukraine in attacking the Crimean bridge”, which has been severely criticized in the country. The German Ministry of Defense has responded to this, but another confusing security detail occurred during the period.

Mainland Observer reported that on March 3, local time, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius held a press conference on the wiretapping scandal. Part of his speech was released in Germany in the form of an encrypted audio file on the 4th. on the Ministry of Defense website. The German Ministry of Defense reminds visitors that visitors can access a 13MB MP3 recording file by clicking on the document link to enter the German Wehrmacht cloud storage server and entering the password “1234”.

Although the recording file is not classified on cloud storage, and the password “1234” may even be just a temporary placeholder, the simplicity of the password was still criticized by the German media. In response, Germany’s “Bild” posted a screenshot of the prompt from the Ministry of Defense’s page in the report and asked, “The password is 1234. Is this really safe?”

“Bild” pointed out that it is still unclear what means the Russian side used to eavesdrop and obtain a 38-minute recording of the conversation between high-level German military officers. The fact that confidential phone calls were eavesdropped has made the outside world seriously doubt whether there is a huge loophole in the confidentiality of the Ministry of Defense.

“However, even after Germany’s biggest eavesdropping scandal in recent years, our Ministry of Defense still uses a password as simple as ‘1234’. This security detail is really embarrassing,” Bild said to the German Ministry of Defense. , “I hope that the Ministry of National Defense will never use such a simple password within the scope of its duties no matter what.”

Russia Today (RT) reported earlier that on March 1, local time, Simonyan, editor-in-chief of Russia Today, released a recording. In the recording, German Air Force Director (Force Commander) Ingo Gerhartz and other senior officials discussed the possibility of deploying “Taurus” cruise missiles in Ukraine and whether the “Taurus” cruise missiles could technically destroy Crimea. Asia-Pacific Bridge, how to remove suspicion of Germany’s direct involvement in the conflict and other sensitive information.

The 19-kilometer-long Crimean Bridge is currently the longest bridge in Europe and the only land passage connecting the Crimean Peninsula and the Russian mainland. In the Russia-Ukraine conflict, it was not only a key supply line for the Russian army, but also considered a symbol of Russia’s control of Crimea.

In the roughly 38-minute tape of the conversation, the officers also discussed whether Ukraine could attack the bridge without the involvement of German soldiers and how many missiles Germany could send to Ukraine. One of the German officers also said that the US and British forces “have long been directly involved in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.” After the recording was exposed, its authenticity was quickly acknowledged.

#Chinese #electric #vehicles #blocked #entering #United #States #U.S #professor #calls #Biden #administration #beat #join
2024-03-07 07:20:32