“Twitter whistleblower Zatko has signed a non-disclosure agreement with Twitter” – IT Pro – Information

Clearly it is dependent on what you imply by “listening to”,

A confidentiality settlement forces you to continue to keep silent about what you know about a selected matter, but it is an agreement in between people, so it does not change the point that you have a lawful obligation to report violations of the regulation, for illustration, due to the fact the regulation generally prevails. personal legislation agreements.
(or in other phrases: if I pay back you to kill you, it is really nevertheless murder).

So, if that listening to exists simply because there is a non-public regulation agreement that wants to be held, then you are not authorized to say something. But if that hearing is the end result of a rule imposed by legislation (for illustration: a felony listening to, or an interrogation by the Nationwide Assembly, or an interrogation by a regulatory entire body (these as the FTC) – then the relevance of this can take precedence around your privately agreed duty of confidentiality.

Except the legislation in the United States is noticeably various on this place, you have not violated your duty of confidentiality with this letter.

Then you can find just the issue of how the media bought wind of this:
that he himself was the person who also informed the media, that’s an additional tale, but someone inside of the corporation tipping is that then there is no difficulty for this person.

[Reactie gewijzigd door i-chat op 9 september 2022 12:18]

–