Trump’s Immigration Plan Could Endanger Hundreds of Thousands Under Humanitarian Parole
Table of Contents
the future of the humanitarian Parole program, which has allowed nearly half a million individuals to enter or remain in the United states, hangs in the balance. Presidential candidate Donald Trump’s hardline stance on immigration casts a long shadow over the program’s continued existence, jeopardizing the status of hundreds of thousands of immigrants.
implemented by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2022, the program had admitted 494,799 individuals by June 2024. Initially designed for Ukrainians fleeing the war in their homeland, it later expanded to include Venezuelans, Cubans, Haitians, and Nicaraguans – nationalities heavily represented among those arriving at the southern border.
Humanitarian Parole grants temporary entry or residency for two years,even to those otherwise ineligible. Applicants require a sponsor and financial support, receiving Advance Travel Authorization (ATA) to reach U.S. soil.
Trump has openly criticized the program, vowing to dismantle it.He’s specifically targeted those who entered using the CBP One mobile submission.
In a recent interview, Trump stated, “I would revoke and expel them. Also, the application is bad, but the worst thing is the flights because they tried to say ‘we are going to tighten the border a little’, and now they have planes loaded with illegal immigrants, people who shoudl not be in our country, going everywhere, to the Midwest, because now everything is a border state.”
This statement underscores the potential impact on a meaningful portion of the U.S. population and raises concerns about the future of immigration policy under a potential Trump administration. The implications extend beyond border states, affecting communities nationwide.
Trump’s Immigration Crackdown: Humanitarian Parole and CBP One on the Chopping Block
republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has vowed to eliminate the humanitarian parole program and the CBP One mobile app if elected, signaling a significant shift in US immigration policy. This hardline stance, announced recently, has ignited a firestorm of debate regarding its potential impact on border security and the lives of migrants seeking refuge in the United States.
Trump’s proposed changes target two key elements of the current immigration system. Humanitarian parole, which allows individuals facing dire circumstances in their home countries to enter the US temporarily, would be eliminated under his plan. Similarly, the CBP One app, used by many migrants to schedule asylum appointments, would also be scrapped.
In a statement reported by Fox news, Trump declared, “Prepare to leave, especially quickly if you are criminals. They are going to come out very quickly.” He further argued that current immigration policies endanger the security and stability of American communities.
The potential consequences of eliminating humanitarian parole are far-reaching. Thousands of individuals who rely on this program for temporary refuge could be left vulnerable. The impact on asylum seekers using the CBP One app is equally significant, as it could create further bottlenecks in the already overburdened immigration system. Critics argue that these changes would exacerbate existing challenges and potentially lead to a humanitarian crisis at the US-Mexico border.
The debate surrounding Trump’s proposed immigration policies highlights the ongoing tension between border security and humanitarian concerns. The implications for US immigration policy and the broader international community remain a subject of intense scrutiny and discussion.
For more data on this developing story, follow Sileña Cisneros on Twitter: @silenacisneros
Trump’s Immigration crackdown: Expert analyzes Potential Impact of Ending Humanitarian Parole
Since its implementation in 2022, the DHS Humanitarian Parole program has provided temporary refuge to nearly half a million individuals fleeing dire circumstances. With presidential candidate donald Trump vowing to dismantle the program, experts are raising alarms about its potential impact on hundreds of thousands of immigrants, particularly those who arrived after the expansion to include Venezuelans, Cubans, Haitians, adn Nicaraguans.
world today News | Senior Editor:
Welcome back to World Today News. Joining us today is Dr. Miguel Ramirez,a prominent immigration law expert and scholar at the Migration Policy Institute. Dr. Ramirez, thanks for being with us today.
Dr. Miguel Ramirez |
It’s my pleasure to be here.
Senior Editor | Dr. Ramirez, Donald trump has stated his intention to revoke the humanitarian parole program if elected. What are the potential consequences of such a move?
Dr. Ramirez |
The consequences could be devastating. This program has provided a lifeline for hundreds of thousands of vulnerable individuals fleeing violence, persecution, and economic hardship. Revoking it would mean sending them back to situations where their lives and livelihoods are at risk. It would also severely strain our asylum system.
Senior Editor |
The Trump campaign has specifically targeted individuals who entered the US using the CBP One mobile app.Can you shed some light on the role of this app in the immigration process?
Dr. Ramirez |
The CBP One app was designed to streamline the asylum process by allowing migrants to schedule appointments with border officials. While it has faced criticism, it’s an significant tool for orderly processing and reducing overcrowding at the border. Eliminating it would likely lead to more chaotic and risky crossings.
Senior Editor |
How would the dismantling of Humanitarian Parole affect border states and communities nationwide?
Dr. Ramirez |
the impact would be felt far beyond border states. Many parole recipients have integrated into communities across the country, contributing to the workforce and local economies. Ending the program could lead to family separations, economic hardship, and a surge in the undocumented population, placing additional strain on social services.
Senior Editor |
What are some potential alternative solutions to address concerns about the Humanitarian Parole program without fully dismantling it?
dr. Ramirez |
The program could be reformed to address any legitimate concerns, such as enhancing vetting procedures or ensuring better coordination with receiving communities. A thorough approach that combines border security measures with humane treatment and due process for asylum seekers is essential. we must remember that behind the numbers are real people seeking safety and opportunity.
Senior Editor |
Dr. Ramirez, thank you for providing your insights on this critically important issue.
Dr. Ramirez |
You’re welcome.
