Trump Transition Team Reportedly Plans WHO Withdrawal: Experts Warn of Catastrophic Impact
Table of Contents
Reports indicate that President-elect Trump’s transition team is planning a swift exit from the world Health Organization (WHO) on his inauguration day, January 20th. This move, according to sources cited by the financial Times, would severely cripple the WHO’s ability to respond to global health crises and leave a significant funding gap.
The potential withdrawal has sparked alarm among public health experts. “The United States’ withdrawal from the WHO will leave a huge funding gap and leadership void in the global health community,and no country will take over,” warned lawrence Gostin,a professor of global health law at Georgetown University. He further elaborated on the devastating consequences: ”The WHO will be arduous to respond to health emergencies, and the number of scientific research personnel will need to be substantially reduced.”
Gostin also highlighted the potential for increased chinese influence in the absence of US leadership within the WHO.This concern echoes anxieties among US policymakers about China’s growing global power and its role in international organizations.
The implications extend beyond funding. Ashish Jha, former White house COVID-19 response coordinator and now dean of the School of Public Health at Brown University, emphasized the WHO’s crucial role in vaccine development and distribution. “If without engaging these agencies, the United States will have difficulty staying informed the next time an outbreak occurs,” Jha stated, underscoring the potential for the US to be less prepared for future pandemics.
While the Trump transition team has remained silent on the matter, the potential impact is undeniable. The US is the WHO’s largest single donor, contributing approximately 16% of its funding between 2022 and 2023.This financial contribution is crucial to the organization’s operations and its ability to effectively address global health challenges.
This isn’t the first time a potential US withdrawal from the WHO has been discussed. During the COVID-19 pandemic, President Trump initiated the process, citing concerns about Chinese influence. However, that process was never completed, and President Biden reinstated US participation upon taking office in 2021.
The situation remains fluid, with the Trump transition team’s intentions yet to be officially confirmed. Though, the potential consequences of a US withdrawal from the WHO are significant and far-reaching, raising serious concerns about global health security and the ability to effectively combat future pandemics.
Biden Averts Government Shutdown with Spending bill Signing
President Biden signed a crucial spending bill late Friday, averting a potential government shutdown that threatened to disrupt essential services across the nation. The legislation, passed by Congress earlier in the week, addresses critical funding needs for various federal agencies and programs.
The bill’s passage followed intense negotiations between the White House and congressional leaders, highlighting the deep partisan divisions that have characterized recent budget debates. Concerns over spending levels and policy riders fueled weeks of uncertainty, leaving many Americans anxious about the potential consequences of a shutdown.
“This bill prevents a damaging government shutdown and provides critical funding for our nation’s priorities,” said a White House spokesperson in a statement released following the signing ceremony. The statement emphasized the administration’s commitment to responsible fiscal management while ensuring the continued operation of vital government functions.
The spending bill includes funding for national defense, infrastructure projects, and social programs. While details of the specific allocations are still being analyzed, the legislation is expected to provide a degree of fiscal certainty for the coming months, allowing federal agencies to plan and execute their operations without the immediate threat of a funding lapse.
the averted shutdown has been met with a mix of relief and concern. While many celebrate the avoidance of immediate disruption, some critics express reservations about the bill’s overall spending levels and potential long-term implications for the national debt. The debate over federal spending is highly likely to continue as Congress prepares for future budget cycles.
The impact of the near-shutdown extends beyond Washington D.C. Federal employees, contractors, and the many Americans who rely on government services experienced a period of uncertainty. The successful passage of the spending bill offers a temporary reprieve, but the underlying political tensions remain a significant factor in future budget negotiations.
The text, pictures and videos on this website may not be reproduced, publicly broadcast or publicly transmitted and used without authorization.
Download our app:
Trump’s Potential WHO Withdrawal: Experts Warn of Devastating GlobalHealth Repercussions
The Trump transition team’s reported plans to withdraw the U.S.from the World Health Organization (WHO) on january 20th have sent shockwaves through the global health community. Experts warn that such a move would have catastrophic consequences, crippling the WHO’s ability to respond to pandemics and leaving a gaping hole in international health security.
A Devastating Funding Gap and Leadership Void
In an exclusive interview with World today News, Laurence Gostin, a professor of global health law at Georgetown University, painted a bleak picture of the potential fallout.
“The United States’ withdrawal from the WHO will leave a huge funding gap,” Gostin emphasized, highlighting the U.S.’s role as the organization’s largest single donor. “It will also create a leadership void in the global health community, with no country stepping in to fill the gap.”
Gostin warned that this would severely hinder the WHO’s ability to effectively respond to health emergencies and conduct crucial research,potentially leading to a meaningful reduction in scientific personnel. He also expressed concerns about increased Chinese influence within the organization in the absence of U.S.leadership.
Impact on Vaccine advancement and Pandemic Preparedness
Ashish Jha, former White House COVID-19 response coordinator and now Dean of the School of Public Health at Brown University, echoed Gostin’s concerns, emphasizing the WHO’s vital role in vaccine development and distribution.
“Without engaging with these agencies, the United States will have difficulty staying informed the next time an outbreak occurs,” Jha stressed, pointing to the potential for a less prepared nation in the face of future pandemics.
A History of Tension and Uncertain Future
This isn’t the first time the U.S. has considered withdrawing from the WHO. During the COVID-19 pandemic,President Trump initiated the process,citing concerns about Chinese influence. However, that process was ultimately stopped, and President Biden reinstated U.S. participation upon taking office.
The situation remains uncertain as the Trump transition team has not officially confirmed its intentions. However, the potential consequences of a U.S.withdrawal from the WHO are profound, casting a shadow over global health security and the world’s ability to effectively combat future pandemics.
