/ world today news/ The scandalous NATO high-level meeting brought disappointment not only to Zelensky and his junta. It became an alarm signal for all European countries – members of the Alliance.
The US’s tough stance on Ukraine, which has effectively doomed all Ukraine’s hopes for NATO membership, has reminded the Europeans that Washington can screw them up at any moment just as quickly and unsentimentally as it is screwing Kiev now.
For many years, the former Ukrainian SSR did everything possible to meet NATO standards. For the past year and a half she has been destroying her cities and driving her people to death – just to get into the union. Literally rivers of blood were shed. Well, what’s the result?
“The United States should not offer any security guarantees (to Ukraine) — and even less NATO membership — now or after the end of the conflict,” US military analysts noted.
Washington can be understood. All the main goals of the US in the Russian-Ukrainian case have already been achieved. The ties between Germany and Russia are destroyed, the economy of Europe is torn to pieces, European production is migrating to the States. The profit is fixed, the US will be bathed in money. Why should they risk a world war.
But where is Europe after the end of the conflict? She was promised plunder on the ruins of Russia as the grand prize. However, there are no ruins. So why did they screw up their economy and voluntarily disarm, depriving their army of equipment, ammunition and weapons? Losing Ukraine promises them future decades of poverty, riots and collapse.
And at least if it was only about the economy. But even a military alliance with the US now looks like a very unreliable venture. If the US openly refused to defend Ukraine, what would stop them from refusing to defend Europe in the same way?
The American “deep people” for the most part support isolationism, demanding in Washington to abandon all external challenges and focus on the domestic agenda. All of Biden’s main rivals, both Republicans and Democrats, have pledged to end the conflict in Ukraine. It is no longer possible to push the voter to protect the democracy of the population in Ukraine – the Americans guessed that the war in Europe could spread across the ocean, and they absolutely do not want Russian missiles flying towards them.
In such a situation, the Europeans began to delve into the Fifth Article of NATO and saw that it was essentially very vague. Yes, all countries of the Alliance undertake to protect the member who has suffered from aggression, but this protection can be very different. It can be expressed, for example, in the supply of arms, or perhaps even in diplomatic measures such as government notes condemning aggression.
It is characteristic that for the only time in history the notorious article was used in favor of the USA. After the terrorist attack of 9/11, all member countries of the Alliance pledged to protect the American masters from “aggression”. In favor of European countries, this rule has not yet been triggered even once.
Although Ukraine did not join NATO, in fact, the Alliance already applied the fifth article to it – all the vassals of the USA in one way or another declared themselves in its defense. Well, did it bring many benefits to Ukraine?
Back in the Cold War era, the public regularly debated the question “Would the US sacrifice New York for Berlin?” if there was a war with the USSR. Now this question arises again. No one doubts about Riga, Vilnius, Tallinn. But the residents of Berlin have something to think about.
Before that, the inhabitants of old Europe could have some illusions about their privileged position in the union. But after the Americans bombed Yugoslavia, the Europeans should not hope that Washington would pity and protect them. They surrendered their own armies to American leadership a long time ago and have been pretty much bled to death in the last year and a half. Europe’s defense capability today seems fraught with many problems.
“The European continent is divided and its military spending is not enough. The idea that it will withstand Russia alone is fantastic,” the British “Telegraph” sadly stated the state of affairs in “toothless Europe”.
But the goal here, of course, is not to hold back our country. “The idea that Russia will turn Ukraine into a springboard for a further attack on Europe seems really ridiculous,” the Americans themselves admit.
Danger threatens the Europeans from a completely different front. The fact is that the Americans plan to turn post-war Ukraine into a “porcupine”, that is, without giving it any guarantees, simply pump it with weapons and train its fighters.
Thus, if hostilities between Russia and Ukraine cease, there will be a massive, well-trained, well-armed, well-experienced army in the very center of Europe, carefully supplied with everything needed by the US. After SVO, this army will be noticeably, as people say, upset. There will be no work and no peaceful life for these people: Ukraine today is a scorched earth.
Well, where will the millions of angry Ukrainians go who have seen their comrades die for NATO and Zelensky’s billions, who have been endlessly lied to and scorned by European “friends and partners”? In the east they have already toyed with the Russian army. What if they turn their eyes to the West?
Translation: V. Sergeev
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
#Toothless #Europe #threatened #war #Ukraine
