Ukraine nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
Member of the ruling party: “To get Trump’s attention”
US President Donald Trump arrives at a campaign site in Arizona on August 23 (local time). During his campaign, President-elect Trump boasted that he would end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office. AP Yonhap News
Ukraine used the Nobel Peace Prize card to win over US President Donald Trump. A member of Ukraine’s ruling party has recommended President Trump as a candidate for next year’s Nobel Peace Prize. During his first term in office, President-elect Trump reiterated his desire for a Nobel Prize.
The Kiwi Independent reported on the 26th (local time) that Oleksandr Merezko, a member of the ruling Servant of the People party to which President Volodymyr Zelenskiy belongs, proposed President Trump as a candidate for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize in letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee made it “I believe that Trump has contributed a lot to world peace and that he can do more in the future,” said Merezko in the letter.
Representative Merezko presented President Trump’s promotion of the ‘Abraham Accords’ during his first term in office as the basis for receiving the Peace Prize. The Abraham Accords are an agreement that normalized relations by establishing diplomatic relations between Israel and Arab countries such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain through the mediation of the United States in 2020.
He then confirmed that, during his first term, he approved the sale of anti-tank missiles to Ukraine, which had been rejected by the previous administration of Barack Obama. Rep. Merezko said, “Trump showed global leadership in providing weapons to resist Russia’s cruel and illegal war of aggression,” and “laid the foundation for the international coalition to is supporting Ukraine today. “
Rep. Merezko told the Kiev Independent, “I want to use this as an opportunity to help Ukraine attract Trump’s attention,” adding, “In Trump’s effort to stop Russia from attacking Ukraine, he stressed territorial integrity, respect for Ukraine’s sovereignty, and the non-use of force.” “We will seek a solution based on international law, including principles,” he explained.
Previously, Lee Jae-myung, head of the Democratic Party of Korea, said on the 25th, “I and the Democratic Party hope and support that the strong leadership of the US President elects Donald Trump and will the end of the war to the end. war between Russia and Ukraine.” Representative Lee also said, “I am willing to take an active role in recommending President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, because the end of the war will have a positive effect on peace on the Korean peninsula.” To date, four US presidents have received the Nobel Peace Prize: Theodore Roosevelt (1906), Woodrow Wilson (1919), Jimmy Carter (2002), and Barack Obama (2009).
If you liked this article, Please click like.
great
great 0
#person #candidate #Nobel #Peace #Prize.. #Ukraine #crisis #people #praised #Mael #Business #Newspaper
2024-11-27 02:52:00
How might this nomination impact the perception of the Nobel Peace Prize, considering Trump’s divisive political figure and the unconventional nature of his candidacy?
## Interview: A Surprise Nomination - Examining Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize Candidacy
**Introduction**:
Welcome to World Today News! Today we’re discussing a rather surprising nomination: Ukraine has put forth former U.S. President Donald Trump as a candidate for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize. This unusual move raises a number of questions about the nature of peacemaking, political strategy, and international relations.
To unpack this complex situation, we’re joined by two distinguished guests. [Guest 1 Name], [Guest 1 Title/Expertise], will provide insight into the complexities of the peace process in Ukraine. And [Guest 2 Name], [Guest 2 Title/Expertise], will shed light on the political implications of this nomination and its potential ramifications.
**Section 1: The Rationale Behind the Nomination**
* **To Guest 1:** Ukraine’s ruling party cites Trump’s role in the Abraham Accords and his approval of arms sales to Ukraine as justifications for the nomination. Do you believe these actions genuinely contributed to peace, or are there other factors at play?
* **To Guest 2:** This nomination seems unexpected, given Trump’s often-controversial foreign policy stances. What do you make of Ukraine’s strategic motivation behind this move? Could it be a calculated attempt to gain Trump’s support for their cause?
**Section 2: The Role of the Abraham Accords**
* **To Guest 1:** The Abraham Accords are undoubtedly a significant achievement in Middle Eastern diplomacy. However, some argue that they primarily benefit Israel and do little to address the root causes of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
How do you assess the long-term impact of the Accords on peace in the region?
* **To Guest 2:** Do you think this nomination could re-energize the debate around the Abraham Accords and potentially lead to further progress in the Middle East peace process?
**Section 3: The Impact on U.S.-Ukraine Relations**
* **To Guest 2:** Could this nomination signal a shift in Ukraine’s approach to the U.S.? Might they be seeking to cultivate a more direct relationship with segments of the Republican party?
* **To Guest 1:** How might this nomination be received by the Biden administration and the broader international community? Could it complicate ongoing efforts to support Ukraine?
**Section 4: The Future of Peacemaking**
* **To Guest 1:** This nomination highlights the complexities and often unconventional nature of peacebuilding. What lessons can we learn from this situation in terms of finding paths to peace in other global conflicts?
* **To Guest 2:** Do you think this nomination, regardless of its outcome, will have a lasting impact on the conversation surrounding the Nobel Peace Prize and its criteria?
**Conclusion**:
Thank you both for sharing your insights on this fascinating and multifaceted issue. Clearly, Trump’s nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize has sparked a range of reactions and raised important questions about the nature of peacemaking, international relations, and the complexities of global politics.
We encourage our viewers to continue engaging in this conversation and exploring the various perspectives surrounding this unexpected development.
