this is how war can change

Table of Contents

• 1 THE STREET
• 2 THE ISLAND
• 3 THE MEETINGS

The order a Putin which changes the teaching nuclear Russian “is a real turning point, which can be very violent and dangerous in outlook”. This is supported by General Leonardo Tricarico, president of the Ics Foundation, former Chief of Staff of the Air Force and military adviser to three prime ministers. “Previously the doctrine for nuclear weapons provided that Putin was allowed to use the atomic bomb only if the country was in danger. Russiaso a very high bar. The music has changed now and we can’t stay calm anymore. Putin is allowed even if Russia is attacked with conventional weapons by a country with the support of those who have nuclear weapons: an outfit that suits the Americans, the French and the English very well. ” The New York Times explains that an attack on Russia by a non-nuclear country, but supported by one with nuclear weapons, will be considered a “joint attack”. Moscow would therefore be legitimate to deal with nuclear weapons not only against Ukraine, but against the US after the tactical artillery missiles were launched by the authority of Biden. Yesterday, the Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, recalled what Putin said on September 12, that is, to implement the Atacms requires an active and on-site contribution from the American workforce. It means that America would go to war with Moscow.

Is World War II that much closer? Kim’s threats and Putin’s new nuclear doctrine

THE STREET

But in Washington they complain that the change in nuclear doctrine is just a phrase “irresponsible” by Putin and that it is not surprising, it was announced, it is not connected to the decision of Biden. It may still be an attempt to prevent the Atacms from being used, as revealed yesterday by the Institute for the Study of War, a foundation in Washington that follows the progress of the conflict. between Russia and Ukraine on a daily basis. The ISW cited millbloggers, Russian military bloggers whose posts report on Moscow’s attitude toward the war, who noted that there was no official confirmation from the White House to the Washington Post’s scoop that Biden would allow the use extended of the Atacms in Kursk. Although they do not confirm, US sources attribute Biden’s decision to the increase represented by the use of approximately ten thousand North Korean soldiers on the front.

THE ISLAND

“From a technical point of view – explains General Tricarico – I am surprised that the opportunity to use Atacms is discussed in depth. It also surprises me that Macron wanted to send French troops to fight, but he does not allow Scalp missiles to be used on Russian soil. The same goes for the British with the Storm Shadows, and the Germans haven’t given up their Tauruses yet. It is absurd to limit the use of these systems, it is like allowing only the arrow to be shot and not the bow or the archer as well.” The explanation of the reasons that pushed Biden to allow that was long refused to give up is now uncertain. “According to the rules of a normal transfer of power – warns Tricarico – whoever leaves office should limit themselves to normal administration and co – hold advice with whoever takes over delicate matters. I doubt this happened between Biden and Trump. Everything indicates that there was no consultation between the president in office and the head -elected seat. Maybe he wanted to put a way in Zelensky’s hands so that he would not give too much advantage to Putin once they go to the negotiating table. But this is the good reading.” The other, the one Tricarico says, is that Biden wanted to “throw sand into the gears of the Trump machine before it even starts, knowing full well that it will go in the opposite direction to his.” Given the relationship between the two, and the fact that Trump’s line is diametrically different from Biden’s and Trump may be able to achieve a result that Biden didn’t even ask for, I lean towards the second hypothetical, “says Tricarico. The war in Ukraine is a fake war, despite the fact that “the tug of war gives Putin a few meters of advantage”. But at least, compared to the first goal of to force Kiev to influence, “Putin is lost, he will never succeed.”

THE MEETINGS

Hypotheses about a negotiating platform are already circulating: territorial concessions in exchange for the end of the war and Ukraine’s failure to join NATO, with a monitoring force on the cease-fire line. Let’s see if Putin is interested in a rise due to Trump’s inauguration or not. Moscow’s language towards Donald is soft and indicates an opening of belief. The peace plans of the president-elect, according to the New York Times, are not weakened by Biden’s decision on the Atacms, while they could be weakened by too many comments from Putin.