/ world today news/ History itself speaks that the situation in the country today resembles that of a hundred years ago. Which, as you know, tends to repeat itself. Then we had successes on the front. Russian troops were preparing to march through Berlin and Istanbul. And suddenly everything collapsed with the help of a third force. Is it possible now to delay the SVO, to collapse the economy, to shake the people with the help of the Internet, provoking protests from people who are tired of waiting for defeat and sanctions? Read about it in the “Tsarigrad” material.
The modern Russian historian Vladimir Makhnach noted that all revolutions in Russia were intra-elite coups disguised as street activism.
Take the well-known events of 1917. The shell famine was overcome, there were successes at the front. A spring offensive was planned with the Allies to end the war. Landing in Istanbul is being prepared.
They are also sewing a new uniform for the victory parade in Berlin. Despite all the difficulties with the economy, there was no famine in the country and no riots in the suburbs.
And suddenly – February 1917. The big bourgeoisie, striving for power, settled a food problem in Petrograd, which smoothly turned into the February Revolution.
The “liberals” who came to power turned out to be useless rulers. In six months they so ruined the country and the army that the Bolsheviks had only to take power.
Russia was shaken
In July 1918, a battle broke out between the Bolsheviks and their followers, the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries. The reason was the separatist Peace of Brest. And this evokes certain associations with our time.
To hang on to power, Lenin and company slipped into de facto capitulation. More than a million square kilometers of territory with a population of 56 million people were ceded to Germany and Turkey.
At the same time, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk excluded Russia from the number of winners of the First World War, depriving it of the right to reparations and the promised Black Sea Straits.
“Indecent Peace” was received negatively. The Left Socialist-Revolutionaries left the Council of People’s Commissars in protest, killed the German ambassador Mirbach, arrested Dzerzhinsky, took 27 Bolshevik functionaries hostage, seized the General Post Office, and sent calls to disobey Lenin’s orders. And everything…
The Bolsheviks recovered by calling in Latvian units loyal to them. They shot the rebels with artillery, the next day the deputy chairman of the Central Committee Aleksandrovich and 12 of his associates were also shot, 450 left social revolutionaries were arrested.
Russia, which a year ago was on the verge of victory, is shaking. The civil war begins…
Now what?
It is obvious that there is a powerful party of supporters of peace with the West in the elites. Did she not manage last year to push through the decision to withdraw from the territory liberated by us, from where the Belgorod Region is being shelled today?
Didn’t she push through the grain deal? Doesn’t it influence decisions in the spirit of “we bomb, but we don’t bomb him”? And isn’t all this a form of treason?
“There has long been a split in the elites – everyone is divided into traitors who still hope to escape and frightened patriots who will no longer be allowed there,” says historian Roman Gozenko.
“And people have questions about the consequences of mistakes, about why the guilty are not sitting. People want justice. And this becomes a pretext for social apathy, which is a breeding ground for all kinds of upheavals,” he says.
“In such conditions, the peace of the principle “stop where you stand” is a good reason to shake the state and start a struggle for power,” continues the expert.
This is what the West’s strategy for fighting Russia is based on today. Even successes at the front they can, with the help of the Internet, present as a defeat for Russia.
By enabling the “party of peace” to push through Brest Peace 2.0 under conditions that will be perceived by the public and the army as treacherous.
And in the end, to bring Putin’s support – the patriots – to the streets to change the government. With the best of intentions, of course.
Remember under what slogans the mass opposition rallies were held in Moscow on the eve of 1991. Not with the demand for “free market”, “capitalism” and “alignment with the West”. And with calls for “fixing socialism”, which, according to the masses, was obstructed by the communist elite.
What follows from this
Historian Alexey Fursov is convinced that this will not happen:
“I strongly doubt that the “indecent peace” in the current conditions can be carried out. Because in this case, many people in power, and for some people, as we know, even “Hague” sentences were issued, will not have a place even in Russia , nor beyond.”
But let’s be honest: there is no ideological or social unity in society today. There is only unity in facing a common enemy.
This means that any actions within the elites that can be interpreted as crossing over to the side of the enemy (the same “indecent peace”) will immediately collapse this unity, which is characteristic only in wartime. This cannot be allowed in any way, so as not to step on the paddle of 1917 and 1991, when many “wanted the best, and it turned out – as always.”
Translation: SM
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
#impose #peace #civil #war #leading #Russia #scenario
