They reject the lawyer’s statement about the lawyer García Castiella

A strong controversy broke out in the few hours due to public statements made by a local lawyer, regarding the issue of the plan to assassinate the attorney general of the province, Pedro García Castiella.

In a television interview, the lawyer Darío Palmier made comments and comparisons about the performance of federal prosecutors in high-risk cases, such as drug trafficking, human trafficking and money laundering, compared to the protection and security measures taken the lawyer, after a plan. to kill, which was generated by the drug leader and hitman who is now in custody, Cristian “Gringo” Palavecino, is frustrated.

“Toranzos and Villalba – referring to federal prosecutors in Salta – have been facing organized crime for more than a decade,” Palmier said. “And none of them have a personal arrest, and they don’t have to enter the court through a metal detector and for years they have been working against drug trafficking, human trafficking and money laundering, which are crimes that lead to corruption,” Palmier compared.

Then, the lawyer showed in terrible terms: “Within criminal jargon there is a logical and simple analysis. If you have 200 guards around you, if you are well protected, what is more Easy? To kill a family member? Or to kill the accuser? Asked on the air.

“It’s much easier to kill a family member. I don’t know the opinion of the prosecutors, but maybe, in an opinion full of courage, they prefer, if they are the target of something, that they fall – with the prosecutors. into their work and they don’t touch their family,” he said.

The Public Prosecutor’s Office refused

This comparison, which tried to discredit the actions of the prosecutor against the important narcopolitical case on the border, created a rejection from the Office of the Public Prosecutor, an organization that officially declared itself through a statement, where he clearly rejected Palmier’s statements.

The statement, which has the signatures of the prosecutor’s offices and fiscal units throughout the province, described the statements as “unacceptable and against constitutional regulations.”

“The action of the criminal prosecutors of the department, which you investigated so lightly, is another situation in your opinion, which is far from the cooperation provided by this Public Prosecutor’s Office with colleagues who perform the same delicate act of the Federal. level.” they said.

“Criminal investigations, both in provincial and federal jurisdiction, are based on the institutional, personal and unparalleled effort of each team that makes up the offices of the prosecutor. the life of a family member is taken away, when they are reasonable, uncertain and trying to normalize the term “death” in any criminal investigation in which we have to intervene, and giving a direct attack on tranquility and social peace in the province” prosecutors said.

“The clarity with which the expression “death” of an accused, or someone in his family, is referred to, coming from a technical-legal professional whose expression is qualified, must be done with bad and how enthusiastic a helper is. justice.”