The former Argentine president Cristina Fernandezwho governed between 2007 and 2015, said this Wednesday that the decision of the Federal Chamber of Criminal Cassation to ratify his conviction in a case for irregularities in road works is a punishment “for being a woman”.
«When you are a woman they make everything 20 times more difficult for you and, if they punish me for something, it is not only for everything I did but because I am a woman too. “They don’t support arguing with a woman and they can’t be right.”he stated after hearing the ruling.
The former president added: “It doesn’t matter girls, next to what thousands and thousands of women have had to endure in horrendous conditions, I don’t see this as a sacrifice but almost as an obligation for someone who has a project for a country and a model for society.”.
Fernández made these statements during a meeting with women in the town of Moreno, province of Buenos Aires and on the outskirts of the Argentine capital, where she went by car from her home while listening to the ruling live.
The Federal Court of Criminal Cassation ratified the sentence issued in December 2022 by the Federal Oral Court, by which Fernández was sentenced to six years in prison and perpetual disqualification from holding public office for the crime of fraudulent administrationin the case called “Roads”. Fernández can now appeal to the Supreme Court.
six years
Next to Cristina Fernandezthe businessman was convicted Lazaro Baez -to six years in prison- and six other officials of his Administration.
After participating in the event with women, Cristina Fernández went to the Patria Institute, a space for political discussion created by her, where hundreds of followers are waiting to show her their support.
Before the reading of the sentence, more than a thousand Peronists gathered before the doors of the Federal Chamber of Cassation to denounce the political persecution that, according to them, the former head of the Argentine State is suffering, surrounded by dozens of police officers equipped with shields and anti-riot material. EFE
#punish #woman
The narratives of the political landscape leading up to the elections?
As the website editor for world-today-news.com, I would conduct an interview with two guests about the recent legal proceedings against former Argentine President Cristina Fernandez. The interview would cover three main themes: the perception of gender bias in the legal system, the nature of the conviction, and the potential impact on Argentine politics.
The first guest, a legal expert, could be asked to provide their perspective on the allegations of gender bias in the legal system and whether there is a pattern of women being punished more severely for similar crimes. They could be asked about the role of the justice system in upholding equality and whether these convictions set a precedent for future cases.
The second guest, a political commentator or analyst, could be asked about the implications of this conviction on Cristina Fernandez’s political career and the ruling party’s reputation. They could discuss the potential impact on upcoming elections and whether this case will be a major issue in the public discourse. Additionally, they could provide insights into the broader context of corruption cases involving former Argentine presidents and the history of political corruption in the country.
1. Legal Expert: World-today-news.com recently covered the conviction of former Argentine President Cristina Fernandez in a case involving road works. As a legal expert, how do you view the allegations of gender bias in the legal system? Do you believe that women are treated more harshly for similar crimes compared to men?
2. Legal Expert: In the context of Argentine justice, how significant is this conviction for the perception of gender bias in the legal system? What role do you think the courts have in upholding gender equality?
3. Political Commentator: What are your thoughts on the impact of this conviction on Cristina Fernandez’s political career? Will it have any substantial impact on her ability to run for future office or her party’s popularity?
4. Political Commentator: Can you provide insights into the broader context of corruption cases involving former Argentine presidents? Does this case represent a unique scenario or is it part of a larger trend?
5. Political Commentator: Do you see potential for this case to become a major issue in the upcoming Argentine elections? How might it shape