As an additional measure, the court ordered an embargo for half a million pesos for the compensation that could be claimed and the costs of the process. Although the defendant appealed the ruling, on April 15 the Chamber rejected the cassation appeal as none of the constitutional guarantees that protect the accused were affected.
The current head of Premiar Seguro served as general manager of the complainant company for two years, between 2017 and 2019. After his departure, the defendant launched his own insurer. It was then that, according to the case, he was left with assets belonging to the company that was under his protection and / or use.
That is why the company took legal action and accused him of “Fraud due to improper retention”, that according to what is established in article 173, subsection 2 of the Penal Code, anyone who “to the detriment of another refuses to constitute or does not return money, effects or any other movable thing that has been given to him in due time. in deposit, commission, administration or other title that produces an obligation to deliver or return ”.
The case was processed in the National Criminal and Correctional Court Number 9 with file N 40574/2019. There it began its judicial journey, in which the company appeared before the court’s offices to give even more details of the theft of various assets of which it had been a victim and that had been perpetrated by Guidotti. At first, the Justice carried out an arduous investigation process around various tests that finally made it possible to determine the veracity of the plaintiff’s complaint.
It was at that time that, after the Police of the province of Buenos Aires carried out various investigation and follow-up tasks, the judge in charge of the case ordered a search of the house of the accused, located in the San Isidro Labrador neighborhood of Benavídez. . This raid took place on September 18, 2019. At that time, the family of the accused was in the building. It was when the authorities in charge of the procedure found some of the denounced goods and proceeded to their immediate kidnapping. Months later and after the corresponding judicial measures, said assets were finally returned to the plaintiff, their legitimate owner. The judicial process continued its course and finally, the National Chamber of Appeals determined the prosecution of the accused.
This crime carries a penalty that can reach up to six years in prison, according to what is dictated by article 172 of the Penal Code. In addition, Chamber 7 of the aforementioned Chamber ordered an embargo for the sum of 500 thousand pesos on the assets of the accused. Now, with the rejection of the appeal filed by the processed party, it only remains for the case to continue in the oral trial.
–
